Abstract:The evolution of cooperation on interdependent networks is arousing increasing concern based on the fact that more and more complex systems in the real-world have been proven to be organized in the form of multi-layer networks rather than single-layer networks. In this study, we examine the effects of self-organized interdependence on the evolution and stabilization of cooperation with social dilemmas depicted by the Prisoner's Dilemma Game (PDG) and the Public Goods Game (PGG) in which agents with the most common strategy have the chance to be rewarded proportionally to the fitness of corresponding agents belonging to the other network. We show that such a type-free rewarding rule, independent of game strategy, establishes a time-varying interdependence between two initially independent populations whereby cooperation is highly promoted as well as stabilized both in the two-player PDG and in the multi-player PGG. Majority-pressure based interdependence at stake has proven pretty neutral in regard to game strategy because it is contingent on strategy configuration rather than strategy itself, which thus gives birth to homologous communities, including cooperative as well as non-cooperative, and thereby an enhanced spatial reciprocity between non-identical networks is triggered. Of particular interest is the double-edged sword effect of network interdependence on cooperation although in most instances the heavier the interdependence, the better the evolution of cooperation. Furthermore, interpretations of the nontrivial relationship between cooperation and benchmark threshold measuring the strategy's local popularity highlight that rewarding the minimum majority is optimal for the evolution of cooperation in such scenario. Finally, we claim our observations are also quite robust with respect to mutation.

Coevolutionary Resolution of the Public Goods Dilemma in Interdependent Structured Populations

Coevolving agent strategies and network topology for the public goods games

Interdependent network reciprocity in evolutionary games

Multi-games on Interdependent Networks and the Evolution of Cooperation

Evolutionary Cooperation in Networked Public Goods Game with Dependency Groups.

Coevolution of Strategy and Structure on Social Networks

Self-organized Interdependence among Populations Promotes Cooperation by Means of Coevolution.

The Coevolution of Partner Switching and Strategy Updating in Non-Excludable Public Goods Game

Self-organization Towards Optimally Interdependent Networks by Means of Coevolution

Cooperation in Evolutionary Games on Complex Networks.

Coevolution Between Strategy and Social Networks Structure Promotes Cooperation

Rewarding evolutionary fitness with links between populations promotes cooperation

Evolution of cooperation driven by majority-pressure based interdependence

The Evolution of Cooperation in Public Goods Games on Signed Networks

Optimal interdependence between networks for the evolution of cooperation

A Strategy Adaptive Evolution Approach Based on the Public Goods Game

Coevolution of relationship and interaction in cooperative dynamical multiplex networks

Evolution of cooperation in public goods games with segregated networks and periodic invasion

Randomly Biased Investments and the Evolution of Public Goods on Interdependent Networks

The emergence of cooperation in public goods games on randomly growing dynamic networks