Abstract:The fact that people often have preference rankings for their partners is a distinctive aspect of human behavior. Little is known, however, about how this talent as a powerful force shapes human behavioral traits, including those which should not have been favored by selection, such as cooperation in social dilemma situations. Here we propose a dynamic model in which network-structured individuals can switch their interaction partners within neighborhoods based on their preferences. For the partner switching, we propose two interruption regimes: dictatorial regime and negotiating regime. In the dictatorial regime, focal individuals are able to suspend interactions out of preferences unilaterally. In the negotiating regime, either focal individuals or the associated partners agree to suspend, then these interactions can be successfully suspended. We investigate the evolution of cooperation under both preference-driven partner switching regimes in the context of both the weakened variant of the donation game and the standard one. Specifically, we theoretically approximate the critical conditions for cooperation to be favored by weak selection in the weakened donation game where cooperators bear a unit cost to provide a benefit for each active neighbor and simulate the evolutionary dynamics of cooperation in the standard donation game to test the robustness of the analytical results. Under dictatorial regime, selection of cooperation becomes harder when individuals have preferences for either cooperator or defector partners, implying that the expulsion of defectors by cooperators is overwhelmed by the chasing of defectors towards cooperators. Under negotiating regime, both preferences for cooperator and defector partners can significantly favor the evolution of cooperation, yet underlying mechanisms differ greatly. For preferences over cooperator partners, cooperator–cooperator interaction relationships are reinforced and the associated mutual reciprocity can resist and assimilate defectors. For preferences over defector partners, defector–defector interaction relationships are anchored, weakening defectors’ exploitation over cooperators. Cooperators are thus offered much time space to interact among cospecies and spread. Our work may help better understand the critical role of preference-based adaptive partner switching in promoting the evolution of cooperation.

The Coevolution of Partner Switching and Strategy Updating in Non-Excludable Public Goods Game

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Individual's expulsion to nasty environment promotes cooperation in public goods games

Evolutionary dynamics in the public goods games with switching between punishment and exclusion

Coevolving agent strategies and network topology for the public goods games

A Strategy Adaptive Evolution Approach Based on the Public Goods Game

Coevolutionary dynamics of aspiration and strategy in spatial repeated public goods games

Cooperation Transition of Spatial Public Goods Games

Evolutionary dynamics of cooperation in the public goods game with pool exclusion strategies

Emergence of Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game with Conditional Participation

Partner Switching Stabilizes Cooperation In Coevolutionary Prisoner'S Dilemma

Adaptive and Bounded Investment Returns Promote Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games

Small world yields optimal public goods in presence of both altruistic and selfish cooperators

Coevolution of Strategy and Structure on Social Networks

Impact of reputation-based switching strategy between punishment and social exclusion on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial public goods game

Partner Switching Promotes Cooperation among Myopic Agents on a Geographical Plane.

Adaptive Evolution of Cooperation Through Darwinian Dynamics in Public Goods Games

Evolution of Cooperation in Spatio-Temporal Evolutionary Games with Public Goods Feedback

Evolution of Public Cooperation with Weighted and Conditional Strategies

Diversity of Game Strategies Promotes the Evolution of Cooperation in Public Goods Games

Evolutionary dynamics under partner preferences