Abstract:Complementing previous studies on the antecedents of abusive supervision at the organizational and individual level, this study investigates how a team‐level factor (i.e., team performance) influences abusive supervision. Drawing on the conservation of resources theory, we propose that low team performance may elicit abusive supervision by making supervisors emotionally exhausted. Furthermore, when faced with low team performance, supervisors with a high prevention focus may experience greater emotional exhaustion and thus display more abusive behaviours, while supervisors with a high promotion focus may be less likely to feel emotionally exhausted and thereby exhibit fewer abusive behaviours. We tested our hypotheses using three‐wave survey data collected from 130 teams within an organization. Findings showed that supervisors' emotional exhaustion mediated the negative effect of team performance on abusive supervision, while only prevention focus moderated the indirect effect of team performance on abusive supervision via emotional exhaustion. This study contributes to the literature on antecedents of abusive supervision, the relationship between abusive supervision and performance, and leadership literature broadly.Practitioner points As abusive supervision results from psychological stress in a specific form of emotional exhaustion, organizations need to improve supervisors’ stress‐management skills by designing relevant training or education programmes, and help them handle or recover from stress. The study’s identification of the specific stressor (i.e., low team performance) fostering abusive supervision can increase organizations’ awareness of the issue and enable them to take appropriate interventions to reduce abusive supervision. Confronted with low team performance, highly prevention‐focused supervisors become more emotionally exhausted and are therefore more likely to abuse subordinates. Thus, in organizations where such a stressor (i.e., low team performance) is salient, practitioners can hire supervisors with a low prevention focus, or assess, select, and promote supervisors based on their prevention focus.

Worse-off Than Others? Abusive Supervision’s Effects in Teams

Influence of Subordinates' and Supervisors' Network Positions on the Effect of Abusive Supervision

Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX

Abusive Supervision and Team Performance: Mediating Effects of Team Communication and Efficacy

Abusive Supervision And Team Effectiveness: The Mediating Role Of Team Efficacy

A Multilevel Model of How and when Team-Level Abusive Supervision Diminishes Team Member Voice

Abusive Supervision Mediates Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: the Moderating Role of Outcome Dependence

The Impact of Abusive Supervision Differentiation on Team Performance in Team Competitive Climates

Abusive supervision and subordinate performance: Instrumentality considerations in the emergence and consequences of abusive supervision.

Why Do Supervisors Abuse Subordinates? Effects of Team Performance, Regulatory Focus, and Emotional Exhaustion

Supervisors' upward exchange relationships and subordinate outcomes: testing the multilevel mediation role of empowerment.

A relative deprivation perspective of the differentiation of abusive supervision in groups

Abusive Supervision, Thwarted Belongingness, and Workplace Safety: A Group Engagement Perspective.

Work-to-family spillover effects of abusive supervision

Abusive Supervision, Leader-Member Exchange, and Creativity: A Multilevel Examination

Abusive supervision and workplace deviance: the mediating role of interactional justice and the moderating role of power distance

Beyond the Individual Victim: Multilevel Consequences of Abusive Supervision in Teams.

Social Exchange Implications of Own and Coworkers' Experiences of Supervisory Abuse

Subordinate poor performance as a stressor on leader well-being: The mediating role of abusive supervision and the moderating role of motives for abuse.

The Effects of Abusive Supervision on Job Performance and Turnover Intention:The Role of Leader Identification and Power Distance

Abusive Supervision and Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior: the Mediating Role of Status Challenge and the Moderating Role of Leader–Member Exchange