Abstract:Are women less likely to win elections than men? Past analyses of U.S. elections have found little evidence of gender bias, leading some scholars to declare: "When women run, women win." However, across many professional domains, women face disparate outcomes in achieving leadership positions. The current research resolves this puzzle through a novel theoretical perspective and methodological advances. Theoretically, we propose that power frees women from restrictive gender norms, reducing gender bias. Thus, gender bias likely exists in politics but is more pronounced for lower-power candidates and less pronounced for higher-power candidates. Because incumbent candidates have more power and challenger candidates less power, we predicted incumbent women would be shielded from gender bias and achieve electoral parity with incumbent men. Conversely, we predicted challenger women would face particularly strong gender bias and disparate outcomes. Methodologically, we resolve prior scope-of-analysis limitations by analyzing every governor and U.S. senator election since women's suffrage (1920). Further, we developed a novel bootstrapping method that resolves regression assumption violations inherent in statistical analyses of candidate-level measures. Analyses revealed 2 important findings. First, our comprehensive dataset revealed that, contrary to past research, women were less likely to win elections than men overall. Second, we found evidence for a power shield effect: Male challengers were three times more likely to win than female challengers, men were 25% more likely than women to win open-seat races, but female incumbents fared just as well as male incumbents. These results suggest that some gender differences may be power differences in disguise. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

Tsar Putin and the “corruption” thorn in his side: The demobilization of votes in a competitive authoritarian regime

Gender systems in the Putin autocracy

The power shield: Powerful roles eliminate gender disparities in political elections.

Do Voters Judge the Performance of Female and Male Politicians Differently? Experimental Evidence from the United States and Australia

Will Women Executives Reduce Corruption? Marginalization and Network Inclusion

Citizen responses to female executives: is it sex, novelty or both?

Women Experts and Gender Bias in Political Media

Gender stereotypes may not influence the choice of female leaders: Experimental evidence from a crisis framed as social or economic during the COVID‐19 pandemic

Power Corrupts . . . or Does It? The Influence of Power and Gender on the Acceptability of Negotiation Tactics

Stereotypes versus preferences: Revisiting the role of alpha males in leadership

Perceived competence overrides gender bias: gender roles, affective trust and leader effectiveness

Gender, risk assessment, and political ambition

Moral character and competence judgments of sexual harassers and fraudsters in academic and business contexts

State-society relations and the sources of support for the Putin regime: bridging political culture and social contract theory

Keep Silent and Make a Big Fortune: How Appearances in Partially Free Media Affect an Authoritarian Intra-Elite Election

Gendered Clientelism and Corruption: Are Women Less Corrupt Than Men in China?

Beyond the party push: Gender differences in voters' persuasion

Legitimacy and Societal Consent under Putin’s Leadership: State Capacity and National Identity

Gender and Dynastic Political Selection

Masculinized or Marginalized: Decentralization and Women's Status in Regional Polish Institutions

Analysis of the Relationship between Women’s Participation and the Rate of Corruption in the Post-Soviet States