N-Doped Graphene Quantum Dot-Decorated Three-Dimensional Ordered Macroporous In 2 O 3 for NO 2 Sensing at Low Temperatures
Ya-Kun Lv,Yan-Yang Li,Rong-Hui Zhou,Yu-Ping Pan,Hong-Chang Yao,Zhong-Jun Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c03369
2020-07-07
Abstract:Nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) detection is of great importance because the emission of NO<sub>2</sub> gas profoundly endangers the natural environment and human health. However, a few challenges, including lowering detection limit, improving response/recovery kinetics, and reducing working temperature, should be further addressed before practical applications. Herein, a series of N-doped graphene quantum dot (N-GQD)-modified three-dimensional ordered macroporous (3DOM) In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> composites are constructed and their NO<sub>2</sub> response properties are studied. The results show that compared to pure 3DOM In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, reduced graphene oxide (rGO)/3DOM In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, and N-doped graphene sheets (NS)/3DOM In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, the N-GQDs/3DOM In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> sensing materials exhibit higher NO<sub>2</sub> responses with fast response and recovery speed and low working temperature (100 °C). In addition, the detection limit of NO<sub>2</sub> response for the optimal N-GQDs/In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> sensor is as low as 100 ppb. Upon exposure to CO, CH<sub>4</sub>, NH<sub>3</sub>, acetone, ethanol, toluene, and formaldehyde, only very weak responses could be observed, indicating good selectivity for the synthesized material. More attractively, the responses of the optimized N-GQDs/In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> sensor exhibit no obviously big fluctuation over 60 days, implying good long-term stability. We suggest that the formation of heterojunctions between 3DOM In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and N-GQDs and the doping N atoms in N-GQDs play crucial roles in improving the NO<sub>2</sub> sensing properties.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acsami.0c03369?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.0c03369</a>.SEM images of <b>rGO/In</b><sub><b>1</b></sub> and <b>NS/In</b><sub><b>1</b></sub>; TEM images of NS; AFM, cathodic scan, and anodic scan of N-GQDs; survey XPS spectra of In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, N-GQDs, and <b>NG/In</b><sub><b>1</b></sub>; Mott–Schottky plots and UPS of In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and N-GQDs; DRS spectra and (<i>ah</i>ν)<sup>2</sup> vs <i>h</i>ν plot of In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>; EIS and PL spectra of In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and <b>NG/In</b><sub><b>1</b></sub>; FT-IR spectra of In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and <b>NG/In</b><sub><b>1</b></sub> after adsorption of NO<sub>2</sub>; dynamic response, humidity stability, and the anti-interference test of <b>NG/In</b><sub><b>1</b></sub>; and a comparison of some typical graphene and In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-based NO<sub>2</sub> gas sensors with that of <b>NG/In</b><sub><b>1</b></sub> sensor in this work (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsami.0c03369/suppl_file/am0c03369_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
materials science, multidisciplinary,nanoscience & nanotechnology