Verifying the “controversial” Available Sites Via Typical Bi3+ Luminescent Feature:Exemplarily Based on the Ca2MgSi2O7:Bi3+ Phosphor

KANG Fengwen,HAN Jin,PENG Mingying
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/j.issn.1000-0518.2016.12.0
2016-01-01
Abstract:Multi-photoemissions from multi-luminescent centers that correspond to multi available sites in a given crystal are frequently noticed in previous works .Depending on the exact type of dopant built into , compounds having multi available sites should correspondingly offer multi luminescent centers , but some kinds of such compounds sometimes exhibit only one luminescent center , exhibiting the “controversial” centers.According to previous works , the akermanite(Ca2MgSi2O7), which has been known as the classical afterglow host for a long term , belongs to this type of compounds having the “controversial” Ca sites.Here we report on utilizing the typical luminescent behavior of the non-rare-earth(non-RE) ion(Bi3+) to explore the issues of “controversial” Ca sites in Ca2MgSi2O7 crystal.Our results show that the excitation bands centering at 250 nm and 276 nm can pump all samples of Ca2 MgSi2 O7∶Bi3+to exhibit dual Bi3+-related photoemissions centering at 582 nm and ~350 nm, respectively.In combination with the crystal structure analysis , the spectral results indicate that there are dual Bi 3+luminescent centers [ denoted as Bi 3+(Ⅰ) and Bi3+(Ⅱ)] at two different Ca2+sites coordinating with six-and eight-oxygen atoms in the Ca2MgSi2O7 host.Surprisingly, the spectral results support the existence of the energy transfer from Bi 3+(Ⅰ) to Bi3+(Ⅱ) and the process is found to be unidirectional .Further analysis indicated that the relative emission intensity of 582 nm and~350 nm derived from Bi 3+(Ⅰ) and Bi3+(Ⅱ) centers is tightly relied on the incident excitation wavelength and the Bi3+doping contents .Our results clearly prove that there are two available Ca sites instead of only one Ca site in Ca2 MgSi2 O7 crystal.Because of the reason , this work provides a new insight into verifying the available sites in some unknown or/and well-known crystals from another point of view .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?