Abstract:In 2013, the government officially approved the construction task of developing high-standard farmland, which had been written into the outline of the "12th Five-Year Plan", the "13th Five-Year Plan" and the "14th Five-Year Plan", effectively ensuring the sustainable development of farmland with high and stable yield in China. Moreover, with the rapid progress of urbanization and industrialization, the quality and usage of cultivated land have changed greatly, and the relationship between the economic value, social value and ecological value of land has become increasingly prominent. Whether the development of high-standard farmland, especially the high-standard farmland used for grain production, has achieved the goals of increasing farmers' income, agricultural output and rural development is not clear. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the comprehensive benefits of high-standard farmland development in grain production, so as to scientifically measure the results of the development. From the perspective of economic, social and ecological benefits, this paper establishes an entropy weight evaluation index system and a model to evaluate the level and effectiveness of high-standard farmland development from 2013 to 2020 in China. The results show that the high-standard farmland development project has improved the yield of grain and the basic productivity of cultivated land, effectively increased the yields of land in the project area and promoted the protection and improvement of cultivated land quality, which includes soil quality improvement, soil fertility enhancement, pollution control and soil remediation. The project also helped raise the farmers' income levels and improved farmers' agricultural knowledge and skills in the project area. The projects are very beneficial for agricultural production, the farmers' income and rural development. However, there is still a certain gap between the national average level of improvement and the original goal set in the policy. The average grain yield per mu (Note: 1 mu ≈ 0.0667 ha, similarly hereinafter) was expected to be increased by less than 100 kg (the national average was a 40 kg increase), and the degrees of improvement in economic, social, ecological and comprehensive benefits in different project types were also different. In the future, we suggest that the project should be implemented according to local conditions and the features of each region. We should pay attention to the protection of basic farmland quality and further improve grain output to achieve the goal of stabilizing and increasing production.

Is It Worthwhile for Farmers to Grow Grain?—A Study of Farmers' Behavior of Growing Grain

Simulating study on the performance of grain subsidy policies based on a household model

Farm Household Management Behavior in Grain Production

The impact of participation in agricultural industry organizational models on crop yields: evidence from Chinese wheat growers

The Payment of Grain to Green Project, the Behavior Choice of Peasants and Their Gains and Losses

Impact of Wheat Price Changes on Farmers' Willingness to Participate in Fallow

Analysis of Output Effect of Chinese Grain Intervention Policy

An Empirical Study of the Major Factors Influencing Grain Outputs and the Policy Choices

Grain subsidy, grain orders financing and farmers' grain production

Key Factors Affecting Farmers’ Choice of Corn Reduction under the China’s New Agriculture Policy in the ‘Liandaowan’ Areas, Northeast China

Cost-benefit analysis across smallholder rice farmers reveals that existing fertilization practices severely compromise their income

Effect of Farmers' Behavior on Agricultural Production Benefits: an Empirical Analysis Based on Market Driving Force in China

Do Farm Subsidies Effectively Increase Grain Production? Evidence from Major Grain-Producing Regions of China

Government subsidy policy for green and efficient raw materials considering farmer heterogeneity

Effect of Expected Price on Farmers' Corn Planting Decision-Based on the Survey of Corn Farmers in Jilin and Heilongjiang Provinces

Empirical Study on the Sustainability of China’s Grain Quality Improvement: The Role of Transportation, Labor, and Agricultural Machinery

Conversion Margins for the Major Uses of Agricultural Land and Their Variations in Shandong Province, China

Can the Adjustment of China's Grain Purchase and Storage Policy Improve Its Green Productivity?

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Benefit of High-Standard Farmland Development in China

The Economic Welfare Effect on Rural Areas of Grain to Green Project in Comparative Perspective: An Empirical Study Based on 79 Counties in Shaanxi Province