Initial 3-C–2D Surface Seismic and Walkaway VSP Results from the 2015 Brooks SuperCable Experiment

Kevin Hall,Helen Isaac,Joe Wong,Kevin Bertram,Malcolm Bertram,Donald Lawton,Xuewei Bao,David Eaton
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2016-13957253.1
2016-01-01
Abstract:A 3C walkaway VSP and surface seismic experiment was conducted at the Containment and Monitoring Institute (CaMI) Field Research Station (FRS) in May of 2015. Two parallel NE-SW receiver lines were laid out with one line (Line 108) centered on well CMCRI COUNTESS 10-22-17-16, and the other (Line 106) offset 100 m to the northwest. Receiver lines 106 and 108 had single-component SM-24 geophones at a 10 m receiver spacing, connected to an Inova Aries SPML recorder. In addition, receiver line 108 had three-component SM-7 geophones in nail-type casings at a 30 m receiver spacing recorded by Inova Hawk nodal systems. A three-component ESG SuperCable was deployed in the well at three different levels, giving receiver positions in the well from 106 to 496 meters depth at a 15 m spacing. These data were recorded using ESG Paladin recorders. A Geode recorder was present in the cab of the EnviroVibe source in order to record the ground force. Two source lines were acquired three times, once for each tool position in the well. The source was an IVI EnviroVibe sweeping from 10-200 Hz linearly over 16 s with an additional 4 s listening time. Source line 208 (NE-SW) had a Vibe Point (VP) every 10 m, offset to the NW of the surface receiver locations, for a walkaway VSP. A semi-circular source line (204) with a radius of 400 m and a VP every five degrees was acquired for a velocity tomography study. Finally, source line 208 was re-acquired using a variety of filtered and unfiltered m-sequence sweeps while the SuperCable was removed from the well. The m-sequence data can be combined and used to test multiple simultaneous source scenarios.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?