Abstract:The purpose of this study is to examine the meaning of a word, ‘benefit (利)’, used by intellectuals in the Edo period to reveal how the difference between the justice (義) and benefit (利) was criticized in Japan and how the value of using benefit (利) for people’s livelihoods developed. The evaluations of ‘benefit (利)’ are divided depending on whether you view 利 as ‘利 of liyog (利欲)’ or ‘利 of limul (利物)’. In Neo-Confucianism, ‘利’ was interpreted as ‘利 of liyog (利欲)’, so it was used in a negative sense. However, intellectuals in the early Edo period viewed ‘利’ ambiva- lently, which served as an opportunity to look at the Neo-Confucian view of justice and benefit critically. In the middle of the Edo period, Ogyu Sorai criticized the Neo-Confucian view of justice and benefit thoroughly, which significantly changed the Japanese perception of ‘利.’ He thought that both ‘justice (義)’ and ‘benefit (利)’ came from striving on social duties and defined those engaged in giving benefit (利) as ‘the superior man (君子)’ and those engaged in receiving benefit (利) as ‘the mean man (小人)’. He believed that both the superior and mean should endeavor for ‘pacifying the people (安民)’ and ‘making livelihoods (營生)’ so as to keep the society stable. Furthermore, Ogyu Sorai argued that 『Mencius (孟子)』’s view of justice and benefit was a discourse presented in the context of Baekgajaengmyeong (百家爭鳴) in which there was a lot of dispute between schools, and it did not make sense for posterity to imitate this discourse as it is. Japanese intellectuals influenced by him recognized that the saint as a ruler who gave benefit (利) to the people, not a moral person who rejected benefit (利), and argued that to carry out ‘flourishing benefit (興利)’ at the policy level conformed to the will of the old saint.

A Probe on Lectures of Justice and Benefit

The Dimensionality of Marx's Political Emancipation and Chinese Political Development

On the Dual Influence of Confucian's Viewpoint of Justice and Benefit and Its Contemporary Value

The Theoretical Prospect in the Age of Rights

From Theory of Justice to Theory of Morals——An Analysis based on Marxism and the Moral Point of View

An Exploration into and Analysis of Mozis Utilitarianism

A Study of the Research Mode on the Traditional Legal Ideology of the Ancient China --citing an Example of "rite and Punishment" from the Confucianism Theory Before the Qin Dynasty

Focus:building up the idea of socialistic rule of law;promoting the construction of Rechtstaat Introduction on Socialism Rule of law

Mozi's "Concept of justice and benefit" and its contemporary moral education value

On literary ethical criticism

An Analysis of the Proposition of Socialist System of Legal Theory with Chinese Characteristics

People’s Justice: Socialist Law and Equity in China, 1921–1945

On the Dialectical Unity of Rule by Law and Rule by Morality in Socialist Market Economy

The Distinction between ‘Justice and Benefit(義利)’ and ‘Flourishing Benefit(興利)’ : Ogyu Sorai’s criticism over the distinction between ‘Justice and Benefit’

Fragmentary or Comprehensive:Comparative Study of Dewey's and Rawls' Social Governance Theories

Issues Concerning Rawls

System of "-ism" and System of Justice

Justness: the Fundamental Moral Principle in Social Governance

The Social-Political Basis of Philosophy of Law——a Study on "the Approach to the Social-Political Philosophy of Law" in the Establishment of Marx's Theory of Law

The Examination of Globalist Discourse and the Construction of Chinese Legal Philosophy——The Third Part of Knowledge-Critique of Deng Zheng-Lai

Studies in applied ethics(Commentaries)