Abstract:From a global perspective,although the protection of freedom of expression will still be a problem in many countries,the new challenge of freedom of expression in the age of Internet is that people with ability and freedom to communicate freely tend to communicate only with people they agree with.This kind of ineffective communication leads to not only some negative consequences as "debates and communication cannot help people get close to the truth," but also to some serious negative ramifications as political division and social contradiction.In 2004,Ronald Dworkin delivered his concern in his writings on political division in American democracy.He also put forward his theoretical solution —"return to the common background." However,Dworkin's solution is more like an ideal one lack of practical strategy and workable operation.This article proposes a principle of "New Public Forum" and expects to solve the problem on a systematic,strategic and operational level.The principle of traditional public forum considers its main goal as solving the dilemma between the valuable role of mass media and the right of individuals to express freely and effectively.Today we have to deal with another dilemma because whereas the internet improves people's capability of sending and receiving information and expressing their opinions,the effectiveness of communication itself is still being threatened.Cyberkans,a phenomenon of worldwide network Balkanization,is the linchpin in this dilemma.Cyberkans results from complex factors such as political and legal policies,business strategies of Internet product manufacturers and a more crucial one that ordinary people as consumers tend to choose the internet product to help them filter for favorable information and opinions.In the Internet era,people not only rely on information filtration,but also prefer and actively choose filtering tools.They are fond of "personalized" products,which inevitably lead to information "cocoon" and "Daily Me." That is why people with different values,different preferences and different interests are easily separated and divided into different groups.Furthermore,opinions and beliefs in divided groups tend to become extreme in the process of "Group Polarization," which intensifies social contradictions and affects social stability because of the lack of effective debate and communication.Malfunction of the marketplace of opinions,group polarization and tagging tendency all manifest certain kind of ineffective communication resulting from Cyberkans. There are at least two solutions for these problems.The first one is to remove all separation institutes and integrate all information into one platform.This proposal fundamentally denies the network users' choices and overthrows market mechanism in the Network Economy,that's why it can only be applied to some web sites of government and other public service departments.The second solution is to establish a new kind of "Public Forum" for effective communication meanwhile keeping commodity market of internet working by itself.This new Public Forum Doctrine includes the test of extensity,compatibility and,the most important,efficiency.Extensity Test requires the forum to reach as many opinion groups as possible.Compatibility Test requires the forum to contain as many different opinions as possible.Efficiency Test requires political debaters to follow certain kind of regulations to make sure debates are reasonable and yield reasonable results.Considering the actual situation in China,the traditional mainstream media has the responsibility and capability to become the platform of the new public forum.

Discourse strategy of opinion leaders in cyber collective actions: A case study of Li Tianyi

Cyberkans and Ineffectvie Communication:A New Public Forum Doctrine in the Internet Era

Exploring Chinese Cyber Discourse: Integrating Political and Legal Perspectives

Cyber Opinions and the Image of China A Study on a New York Times Article and Its On-line Comments

Rhetorical Features of Public Affairs Discussion on Online Forums and the Causes

How Propaganda Moderates the Influence of Opinion Leaders on Social Media in China

Civic Participation in Chinese Cyberpolitics: A Grounded Theory Approach of Para-Xylene Projects

Exploring the Cyber Governance Discourse: A Perspective from China

Identifiers of College Network 0pinion Leaders and Guiding Strategies

On the Formation Mechanism of College Students'cyber Opinion

Leaderboards and Top Public Opinions: A Study of Discourse Conflict in the Internet Public Opinion Field

Variations in power of opinion leaders in online communication networks

Which Social Media Facilitate Online Public Opinion in China?

Media Portrayal of Hackers Inchina DailyandThe New York Times: A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis

Discursive Strategy of Opinion Expression and Government Response in China: Text Analysis Based on Online Petitions

The Invisible Opinion Leader:A Study of the Characteristics of Network Opinion Leaders in Colleges and Universities

On the Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet Public Opinion

Opinion leaders and crisis communication during the COVID-19 pandemic: A study of theme evolution and emotional impact on Twitter

Approaches and Strategies of Online Opinion Investigation

Online Public Opinion Guidance Strategy for College Students in the Era of We Media

What public and whose opinion? A study of Chinese online public opinion analysis