Abstract:The orientation of the function of urban communities is a fundamental issue in the construction of urban communities. However, there remain some misunderstandings in the current studies and practices of urban community construction in China. First of all, the government and many researchers often equate the function of communities with that of community organizations. Secondly, they may equate the function of communities with how to transfer various social security and welfare functions previously undertaken by work units and organizations to urban communities. Thirdly, they may equate the function of communities with that of traditional communities. In addition, these misunderstandings have given rise to some ″unexpected ″ negative consequences in the urban community construction. There are two most serious ones. First, the organization and operation of almost all urban communities in China are increasingly becoming over-organized or executive. Second, citizens have little sense of participation in urban communities and construction of urban communities, which leads to a situation in which the government is ′enthusiastic ′ whereas the society is ′indifferent ′.The present paper holds the opinion that the discussion of the functional orientation of urban communities ought to be in accordance with the transition of the fundamental structure of the state-society relationship. Under the condition in which the state, market, and non-profit organizations each exerts unique functions, the function of urban communities should neither replace nor obstruct the function of these organizations. Urban communities must exert their unique functions to be one institutional existence in the society. This unique function is to construct public spheres in the urban society and through this construction, urban communities become a medium and mechanism by which various social activists can express their desires, interests, and communicate with others. These public spheres are not the spheres where the state is in opposition with the society, but rather spheres which mediate the relationship between the state and the society. This sort of public spheres is simultaneously influenced by the state and the society, but it has its peculiar character and logic beyond the influence of the state and the society.

Chinese Community Building As “naming Politics”:Issues,Risks and Transcendence

Political Risk of Centralization and the Vertical Separation of Powers:Reform of Contemporary Social Management System from a Historical Perspective

From Municipal Square to Civic Square:Spatial Representation of China's Political Reform Towards Good Governance

On Position of Future Community Construction in China

The Right to Envision the City? the Emerging Vision Conflicts in Redeveloping Historic Nanjing, China

Changing Attitudes of Beijingness to Westernized Place Names in Beijing: From the Semi-Colonial Period to Postmodern Twenty-First Century

An Ethnography of A Building Both as Museum and Temple: On the double-naming method as arts of politics

Politics of urban renewal: An anatomy of the conflicting discourses on the renovation of China's urban village

Communal China:Enhancing the Foundation of State Governance Through Communities

Place Names, Symbolic Power and the Chinese State

Traditional architectural forms in market oriented Chinese cities: Place for localities or symbol of culture?

The Fragmentation of Community:An Empirical Study on Community Building and Urban Social Governance in Y City

City-renaming and its effects in China

Re-orientating the Function of Urban Communities to Construct Urban Public Spheres

Urban Community Governance: Confusion and Thinking

Building a “neighborhood spot”,and explore new ideas of community building——Jiading District, Jiading town streets, for example

Community Governance Reform in Urban China: A Case Study of the Yantian Model in Shenzhen

Who Can Represent Us? A Case Study on Community Governance

Social Capital Analysis of the Community Construction in Urban China

Civility Construction in the Diverse Identification of Community Power

Community Governance in Transitional Urban China