Abstract:Purpose: Patients with X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets (XLH) often develop coronal plane knee deformities despite medical treatment. Hemiepiphysiodesis is an effective way to correct coronal plane knee deformities in skeletally immature patients, but a full understanding of the rate of angular correction after hemiepiphysiodesis in XLH patients, compared with idiopathic cases is lacking. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts of 24 XLH patients and 37 control patients without metabolic bone disease who underwent hemiepiphysiodesis. All patients were treated with standard-of-care medical therapy (SOC=active vitamin D and phosphate salt supplementation) in our clinical research center and had a minimum of 2-year follow-up after hemiepiphysiodesis. Demographic data as well as complications, repeat procedures, or recurrence/overcorrection were recorded. Standing lower extremity radiographs were evaluated before the surgical intervention and at subsequent hardware removal or skeletal maturity, whichever came first. Mean axis deviation, knee zone, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), and medial proximal tibial angle were measured on each radiograph. The rate of angular correction was calculated as the change in mLDFA and medial proximal tibial angle over the duration of treatment. Results: The magnitude of the initial deformity of the distal femur was greater in XLH patients as compared with control for varus (XLH mLDFA 97.7 +/- 4.9 vs. Control mLDFA 92.0 +/- 2.0 degrees) and valgus (XLH mLDFA 78.7 +/- 6.2 vs. Controls mLDFA 83.6 +/- 3.2 degrees). The rate of correction was dependent on age. When correcting for age, XLH patients corrected femoral deformity at a 15% to 36% slower rate than control patients for the mLDFA (>3 y growth remaining XLH 0.71 +/- 0.46 vs. control 0.84 +/- 0.27 degrees/month, <3 y growth remaining XLH 0.37 +/- 0.33 vs. control 0.58 +/- 0.41 degrees/month). No significant differences were seen in the rate of proximal tibia correction. XLH patients were less likely to end treatment in zone 1 (55.0% XLH vs. 77.8% control). XLH patients had longer treatment times than controls (19.5 +/- 10.7 vs. 12.6 +/- 7.0 mu, P value <0.001), a higher average number of secondary procedures than controls (1.33 +/- 1.44 vs. 0.62 +/- 0.92 number of procedures), a higher rate of overcorrection than controls (29.2% vs. 5.4%), and a higher rate of subsequent corrective osteotomy than controls (37.5% vs. 8.1%). There was no significant difference in the rate of complications between groups (8.3% vs. 5.4%). Conclusions: Patients with XLH undergoing hemiepiphysiodesis have a 15% to 36% slower rate of femoral deformity correction that results in longer treatment times, a higher likelihood to undergo more secondary procedures, and a lower likelihood to reach neutral mechanical alignment. Significance: This study provides important information to guide the timing and treatment of patients with XLH and coronal plane knee deformities. In addition, results from this study can be educational for families and patients with respect to anticipated treatment times, success rates of the procedure, complication rate, and likelihood of needing repeat procedures.

Multiplier Method May Be Unreliable to Predict the Timing of Temporary Hemiepiphysiodesis for Coronal Angular Deformity

Multiplier method for predicting limb-length discrepancy

Accuracy of adult height predictions in patients with axial leg deviations using the Modified and the Abbreviated Modified Fels Knee System

Factors influencing correction rate following hemiepiphysiodesis using tension band plates for deformities around the knee: a multivariate analysis study

The Effectiveness of Temporary Hemiepiphysiodesis for Non‐idiopathic Coronal Angular Deformity of the Knee in Children: A Comparison of Hinge Eight‐Plate and Traditional Eight‐Plate

Accuracy of 4 Different Methods for Estimation of Remaining Growth and Timing of Epiphysiodesis

Predicting Rates of Angular Correction After Hemiepiphysiodesis in Patients With X-Linked Hypophosphatemic Rickets

Lower extremity length discrepancy solution by modified drilling epiphysiodesis and anthropological prediction methods: long-term results

Which sagittal evaluation system can effectively predict mechanical complications in the treatment of elderly patients with adult degenerative scoliosis? Roussouly classification or Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score

Comparison of skeletal maxillary transverse deficiency treated by microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion and tooth-borne expansion during the post-pubertal growth spurt stage: <i>A prospective cone beam computed tomography study</i>

Dual Growing Rods Combined With the Apical Convex Control Pedicle Screw Technique Versus Traditional Dual Growing Rods for the Surgical Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis: A Case-Matched 2-Year Study

Complete Correction following Temporary Hemiepiphysiodesis using 2-hole Reconstruction Plates among Skeletally Immature Patients with Angular Deformities around Knees: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study

99Mtc-Mdp Bone Scintigraphy-Based Growth Evaluation and Prediction of Epiphysis Around the Knee: a Study of Paediatric Limb Salvage for Malignant Bone Tumours

A New Method to Predict Postoperative Stem Anteversion in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Do Patient Sex and Age Affect Hemiepiphysiodesis Outcomes?

Indications and Timing of Guided Growth Techniques for Pediatric Upper Extremity Deformities: A Literature Review

A New Method to Predict Anatomical Outcome after Idiopathic Macular Hole Surgery

'One millimetre equals one degree' is a major source of inaccuracy in planning osteotomies around the knee for metaphyseal deformities compared to the digital planning

Evaluation of an individualized facial growth prediction model based on the multivariate partial least squares method

Association between braced curve behavior by pubertal growth peak and bracing effectiveness in female idiopathic scoliosis: a longitudinal cohort study

Inferring Landmark Displacements from Changes in Cephalometric Angles