Being a junior clinical director: five minutes with . . . Lauren Carter.

Susan Mayor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1647

2019-01-01

Abstract:Can being part of a trust’s management team improve junior doctors’ engagement and retention?

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Junior Doctor Retention Strategies: Integrating Knowledge Management with Supportive Leadership and Organizational Climate

Dabić, Marina

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02316-x

IF: 1.815

2024-11-09

Journal of the Knowledge Economy

Abstract:This study aims to evaluate interventions and strategies used to retain junior doctors, with a specific focus on the roles of organizational climate, supportive leadership, and work engagement influenced by effective knowledge management practices. We examine how knowledge management—the systematic process of creating, sharing, using, and managing the knowledge and information of an organization—contributes to creating a favorable organizational climate and supportive leadership strategies. Engaging in a quantitative study with a sample of 950 junior doctors across four Central European countries, we explore the impact of an integrated approach that combines traditional performance-oriented climate models (rational goals model) with knowledge management practices tailored to the unique demands of healthcare settings influenced by current healthcare reforms and bureaucratic systems. Our findings suggest that not only do supportive leadership and a positive organizational climate enhance work engagement among junior doctors, but robust knowledge management practices also play a crucial role in improving retention rates by facilitating continuous learning and effective information sharing. To the best of our knowledge, our research is the first to draw on the synergy between rational goals, organizational climate, supportive leadership, and knowledge management practices to explain the antecedents of junior doctor work engagement and retention. This approach offers new insights into the dynamics of employee retention and underscores fundamental factors influencing junior doctors' retention, paving the way for a more resilient and thriving healthcare workforce amidst the ongoing turbulence in global healthcare.

economics
Clinical leadership development in postgraduate medical education and training: policy, strategy, and delivery in the UK National Health Service

Reena Aggarwal,Tim Swanwick

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S69330

2015-11-17

Abstract:Achieving high quality health care against a background of continual change, increasing demand, and shrinking financial resource is a major challenge. However, there is significant international evidence that when clinicians use their voices and values to engage with system delivery, operational efficiency and care outcomes are improved. In the UK National Health Service, the traditional divide between doctors and managers is being bridged, as clinical leadership is now foregrounded as an important organizational priority. There are 60,000 doctors in postgraduate training (junior doctors) in the UK who provide the majority of front-line patient care and form an "operating core" of most health care organizations. This group of doctors is therefore seen as an important resource in initiating, championing, and delivering improvement in the quality of patient care. This paper provides a brief overview of leadership theories and constructs that have been used to develop a raft of interventions to develop leadership capability among junior doctors. We explore some of the approaches used, including competency frameworks, talent management, shared learning, clinical fellowships, and quality improvement. A new paradigm is identified as necessary to make a difference at a local level, which moves learning and leadership away from developing "leaders", to a more inclusive model of developing relationships between individuals within organizations. This shifts the emphasis from the development of a "heroic" individual leader to a more distributed model, where organizations are "leader-ful" and not just "well led" and leadership is centered on a shared vision owned by whole teams working on the frontline.
A research internship scheme for nurses and its wider implications for clinical managers

Fiona Hibberts,Naomi Hare,Suzanne Bench

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/nm.2024.e2118

2024-08-01

Abstract:There is growing evidence that clinical research activity is linked to better patient outcomes and that staff involvement in research is linked to enhanced morale and retention. Clinical managers have a pivotal role in supporting staff to engage with research, but they are not always given the means to do so and are not always aware of the benefits. In 2021 a research internship scheme was set up as a collaboration between two London NHS trusts and a university, enabling nurses and midwives to undergo training and undertake a range of research activities. Some participants experienced challenges in fitting internship activities around clinical duties despite the fact that the scheme was planned to give them protected time. This article describes the scheme, reports the findings of its evaluation at one of the two trusts, and discusses its implications for clinical managers in terms of how they can be supported to contribute to the development of a research culture.
Junior doctors' workplace well-being and the determinants based on ability-motivation-opportunity (AMO) theory: Educational and managerial implications from a three-year longitudinal observation after graduation

Yung Kai Lin,Chia-Der Lin,Blossom Yen-Ju Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2322719

2024-03-09

Abstract:Purpose: Junior doctors function as trainees from an educational perspective and as employees from a human resource management perspective. Employing the ability-motivation-opportunity (AMO) theory as a conceptual framework, this study longitudinally investigated the factors affecting the workplace well-being and career progression of junior doctors over a 3-year period following their graduation from medical schools. Materials and methods: This 3-year prospective cohort study enrolled junior doctors who graduated from 2 medical schools in June 2019 in Taiwan. This study collected data by implementing web-based, self-administered structured questionnaires at 3-month intervals between September 2019 and July 2022. The collected data encompassed ability indicators (i.e. academic performance and perceived preparedness for clinical practice), motivation indicators (i.e. educational and clinical supervision), opportunity indicators (i.e. clinical unit cultures), and workplace well-being indicators (i.e. burnout, compassion satisfaction, and job performance). A total of 107 junior doctors participated, providing 926 total responses. The data were analysed using univariate analyses and structural equation modelling with path analysis. Results: Over the 3-year period following graduation, the junior doctors' confidence in their preparedness for clinical practice and the educational and clinical supervision had varying degrees of influence on the junior doctors' workplace well-being. The influence of clinical unit cultures, which can provide opportunities for junior doctors, became evident starting from the second year postgraduation; notably, unit cultures that emphasised flexibility and discretion played positive and critical roles in enhancing the junior doctors' workplace well-being lasted to the third year. Conclusions: Our findings provide insights into the distinct critical factors that affect the socialisation of junior doctors within workplace environments over 3 consecutive years. These findings can provide guidance for medical educators and healthcare managers, helping them understand and support the progressive integration of junior doctors into their work environments.
The challenges of becoming and being a clinician manager: a qualitative exploration of the perception of medical doctors in senior leadership roles at a large Australian health service

Didir Imran,Karen Rog,John Gallichio,Laura Alston

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06356-w

2021-04-15

BMC Health Services Research

Abstract:Abstract Background In Australia, activity-based funding models have emphasized the need for hospitals to be accountable for their clinical performance. Clinician managers, with medical backgrounds are essential to ensuring high quality clinical performance and operational management of hospital services. The purpose of this study is to 1. Identify factors influencing doctors to become clinician managers in the Australian healthcare setting. 2. Understand the pathways and challenges faced by doctors in becoming clinician managers. Methods We undertook a qualitative study with semi-structured interviews of 18 clinician managers (who have medical practitioner backgrounds) with formal leadership administrative roles. Interview transcripts were analysed with systematic text condensation. Results All eligible participants approached in this context, agreed to participate and over 80% of the participants were male. We identified five themes: ‘Motivations for leadership’, ‘Pathways to managerial role’, ‘Challenges faced in management roles’, ‘Credibility through clinical practice’ and ‘Management skill cultivation and support’. Clinician managers progressed from being doctors to leadership roles through being encouraged to take on roles, while others felt pressure to take on leadership roles even if this was not a personal goal. Clinician managers described challenges such as feeling under-prepared, maintaining respect form colleagues through still participating in a clinical load, along with juggling priorities such as administrative tasks, managing budgets and performance managing other doctors. Conclusions There needs to be an intentional and more structured approach to training and supporting clinician managers that considers the complex challenges faced by individuals (especially women) as they progress into these roles in the Australian tertiary health services context. There is a need to consider ways of supporting clinician managers to focus on management skills, effective mentorship and address perceptions around losing respect from colleagues if clinician managers cease their clinical loads. Further research is needed among the female medical workforce, along with research to understand if maintaining clinical loads when undertaking a clinical management role in fact leads to better effectiveness in contributing to better patient safety and quality outcomes. Such evidence may assist in addressing these social pressures among clinician managers, and contribute to addressing gender inequality among the clinical management workforce.

health care sciences & services
Experiences of Public Doctors on Managing Work Difficulties and Maintaining Professional Enthusiasm in Acute General Hospitals: A Qualitative Study

Andrew Leung Luk,Adrian Fai To Yau

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00019

2018-03-02

Abstract:Background: Overseas studies suggest that 10-20% of doctors are depressed, 30-45% have burnout, and many report dissatisfaction with work-life balance. A local study on public doctors showed that 31.4% of the respondents satisfied the criteria for high burnout. Young, but moderately experienced doctors who need to work shifts appeared most vulnerable. This study aims to explore the experiences of those public doctors who have managed their work difficulties and maintained professional enthusiasm for references in medical education and continuing professional training. Method: Ten public doctors with reputation were invited respectively from three acute general hospitals for an in-depth interview. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. Content analysis was carried out to identify major themes in relation to the research questions. Results: Three themes emerging from difficulties encountered were (1) managing people, mostly are patients, followed by colleagues and then patients' relatives; (2) constraints at work, include time and resources; and (3) managing self with decision-making within a short time. Three themes generating from managing work difficulties included (1) self-adjustment with practicing problem solving and learning good communication appeared more frequently, followed by maintaining a professional attitude and accumulating clinical experiences; (2) seeking help from others; and (3) organizational support is also a theme though it is the least mentioned. Four themes emerging from maintaining work enthusiasm were (1) personal conviction and discipline: believing that they are helping the needy, having the sense of vocation and support from religion; disciplining oneself by continuing education, maintaining harmonious family relationship and volunteer work. (2) Challenging work: different challenging natures of their job. (3) Positive feedback from patients: positive encounters with patients keep a connectedness with their clients. (4) Organization support: working with good colleagues and opportunity for continuous training. Conclusion: Some implications for medical education include, developing good communication skill for medical students and junior doctors, preparing senior doctors to be mentors, and exploring the motivating force of spirituality/religion.
Engaging and developing front-line clinical nurses to drive care excellence: Evaluating the Chief Nurse Excellence in Care Junior Fellowship initiative

Louise Bramley,Joseph C Manning,Joanne Cooper

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987118808843

Abstract:Background: Global challenges in the development of a highly skilled and motivated nursing workforce jeopardise the delivery of high-quality care. Flexible and innovative workforce solutions are required to overcome these challenges. Aims: To describe the implementation and present the preliminary evaluation of the 'Chief Nurse Excellence in Care Junior' bespoke Fellowship initiative designed to develop the foundational clinical and academic skills of front-line junior clinical staff. Methods: This initiative was developed and piloted at a large, inner-city, acute NHS trust. The initiative involved two main components: a bespoke development programme and an improvement project that was supported by clinical and academic mentors. The initiative was evaluated using structured feedback, case studies and data on dissemination activities. Results: Six front-line nurses completed the first cohort of the initiative that commenced in spring 2016. Results showed a positive impact on professional development relating to the acquisition of new knowledge and skills. Case studies of projects had a demonstrable impact on patient experiences, outcomes and cost savings. Wider organisational and NHS impact was demonstrated through multiple dissemination activities. Conclusion: This preliminary evaluation provides evidence that this initiative is a sustainable, clinically driven career development opportunity at a foundational level that has a demonstrable positive impact on care and staff development. Further work is underway to carry out a longitudinal structure, process and outcome evaluation with particular focus on impact.
Junior Doctors Are Key to Scrutiny of Hospitals, Says Chief Inspector

Nigel Hawkes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4320

2014-01-01

BMJ

Abstract:Doctors—and particularly junior doctors—have a key role in the new hospital inspection system, Michael Richards, England’s chief inspector of hospitals, told a conference at BMA House on 26 June.“I want to recruit you,” he told the audience of junior doctors attending the eighth annual Agents for Change conference, backed by The BMJ , which aims to encourage trainees to become empowered as agents of better care for patients. Richards said that the new inspections launched since he became chief inspector 11 months ago always involved a focus group of junior doctors who work at the hospital, while the 30 strong inspection teams always included doctors in training from other trusts. “You can tell us what’s going on,” he said.Saahil Mehta, a junior doctor who is on an attachment to the NHS’s national medical director, Bruce …
Residents as supervisors: How senior residents make ad hoc entrustment decisions

Kayla Nelson,Sarah McQuillan,Andrea Gingerich,Glenn Regehr

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15017

Abstract:Background: As residency programmes transition to competency-based medical education, there has been substantial inquiry into understanding how ad hoc entrustment decisions are made by attending supervisors in the clinical context. However, although attendings are ultimately responsible for the decisions and actions of resident trainees, senior residents are often the ones directly supervising junior residents enrolled in competency-based training programmes. This clinical dynamic has been largely overlooked in the ad hoc entrustment literature. The purpose of this study was to explore the considerations senior residents entertain when making ad hoc entrustment decisions for their junior resident colleagues. Methods: In semi-structured interviews, 11 senior resident supervisors (third, fourth and fifth year) in obstetrics and gynaecology described how they entrust junior residents with clinical activities in the moment. Following constructivist grounded theory methodology, data were iteratively collected and coded with constant comparison until theoretical sufficiency was determined. Results: Senior residents described many similar considerations as attendings regarding ad hoc entrustment of junior residents, including patient safety, desire to optimise the learning environment, junior resident qualities (such as discernment and communication skills), learner handover from colleagues, and situational factors. Uniquely, senior residents discussed how their role as a middle manager and their desire to protect the junior resident (from burnout, becoming a second victim and from attendings) impacts their decisions. Conclusions: Although senior residents make ad hoc entrustment decisions with some similar considerations to attendings, they also seem to think about additional factors. It may be that these different considerations need to be accommodated in documentation of ad hoc entrustment decisions if these documents are to be used for high-stakes summative entrustment decisions made by competency committees.
Qualitative study of new doctor induction and socialisation

Keith Goodall,Adrian A Boyle,Rod MacKenzie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2022-212369

2024-08-23

Emergency Medicine Journal

Abstract:Aim Junior doctors joining EDs are required to rapidly acquire new knowledge and skills, but there is little research describing how this process can be facilitated. We aimed to understand what would make ED formal induction and early socialisation more effective. Methods Qualitative study; informal interviews of junior doctors, consultants and nursing staff and direct observation of clinical interactions, induction and training in a single ED in an English Emergency Department between August and October 2019. We used constant comparison to identify and develop themes. Findings New junior doctors identified that early socialisation should facilitate patient safety and a safe learning space, with much of this process dependent on consultant interactions rather than formal induction. Clear themes around helpful and unhelpful consultant support and supervision were identified. Consultants who acknowledged their own fallibility and maintained approachability produced a safe learning environment, while consultants who lacked interest in their juniors, publicly humiliated them or disregarded the junior doctors' suggestions were seen as unhelpful and unconstructive. Conclusion Effective socialisation, consistent with previous literature, was identified as critical. Junior doctors see consultant behaviours and interactions as key to creating a safe learning space.

emergency medicine
Innovative recruitment and clinical orientation programme to manage NHS junior doctor shortfall: A district hospital experience

Syed Rehan Quadery,Hamid Roodbari,Pradeep Pardeshi,Dilip Shah,Hira Ahmed,Seema Jain,Jason Saridis,Shakil Rahman,Nithiyananthan Ratnasingam,Caroline Ebdon,Richard Bogle,James Marsh,Ruth Charlton,Guan Lim,David Makanjoula,Daniel Camp,Simon Winn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2019-0047

Abstract:Background: International medical graduates (IMGs) contribute significantly towards the NHS care provision. No standardised clinical orientation programme (COP) for IMGs new to the NHS exists. Objective: Our objective was to describe recruitment and retention strategies for junior doctors (JDs) in general medicine and develop a framework to anticipate outcomes of these interventions using the realist evaluation methodology. Methods: We performed quality improvement interventions of recruitment and COP for new entrant IMGs in our organisation employed between December 2017 and April 2019. Results: Twenty-three IMGs were recruited, 96% successfully completed the COP with a mean contract duration of 13±5 months. From the academic year 2017/18 to 2018/19, mean JD post occupancy increased from 54±3 to 73±4 JDs (p<0.001) and JD locum spend fell by £1.9 million. Conclusion: Our structured COP provides a stable, trained and financially sustainable JD workforce. Application in broader NHS settings is recommended.
Future Hospital Commission, 10 years on - Lessons learned and next steps: The Chief Registrar Programme - what has been achieved?

Clive Lewis,Graham Stow,Oliver Cullen,Sonia Mackenzie,Tom Baker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100153

2024-07-12

Abstract:The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) Chief Registrar Programme (CRP) emerged from the RCP Future Hospital Commission Report (2013) and aimed to address development of clinical leadership and quality improvement to maintain high standards of patient safety and experience. The 2016 pilot created a new senior leadership role recruiting doctors in training committed to quality improvement and leadership development to champion delivering change in trusts, supported by a year-long bespoke development programme designed and delivered by the RCP. Following validation of the pilot's impact, the CRP has evolved to become a 'flagship' programme for the RCP with increasing penetrance across the UK to maximise impact for chief registrars to lead and deliver quality improvement in trusts. The longer-term goal is that enthusiastic early leaders will deliver sustainable and impactful change regionally and in the wider NHS. This article seeks to explore the CRP development themes and reflects on the learning from the programme and the experiences of chief registrars. The CRP has evolved during a time of significant healthcare challenge with the programme delivering a future generation of medical leaders to navigate these challenges, deliver improvement and innovation across the health sector. We show how chief registrars and alumni can continue to drive forward widespread impact on individuals, organisations and the wider NHS, providing a strategic solution to meet current and future challenges in the NHS.
Junior academic‐manager in higher education: an untold story?

Justine Mercer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540910957444

2009-05-15

International Journal of Educational Management

Abstract:The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of new managerialism on junior academic‐managers (defined as those having informal leadership or management roles below the level of head of department). It aims to discover: whether junior academic‐managers experience the same tensions as Heads of Department; whether distributed leadership is possible and/or desirable in Higher Education; and what types of support junior academic‐managers might welcome. The paper draws upon previous literature and a small case study of one university department in a mid‐ranking UK university. Junior academic‐managers experience similar kinds of tensions to heads of department. Although distributed leadership is considered a necessity in higher education, in practice, devolved leadership is more common than genuinely distributed leadership. Junior academic‐managers would benefit from the same types of support as heads of department, but increased administrative assistance would be particularly helpful. Some, though not all, of the tensions felt by both groups could be alleviated if higher education institutions (HEIs) adopted a modified form of workforce remodelling, similar to that being implemented in English and Welsh schools. The empirical data come from within one department of one university. It is debatable how far the findings of this study are generalizable to other contexts. There are relatively few studies looking at academic heads of department, and virtually none looking at junior academic‐managers. The argument that school workforce remodelling might be adapted for the HE sector is not made elsewhere.
Towards the idea of 'clinical capital': A longitudinal study exploring nurses' dispositions and workplace manifestations in an Australian intensive care unit

Amanda Henderson,Mari Takashima,Elizabeth Burmeister,Petra Strube,Sarah Winch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15264

Abstract:Objective: To explore the concept of 'capital' through the study of successive interventions and outcomes (patient and staff) in a quaternity intensive care unit (ICU) across a 5-year time frame. Design: A longitudinal intrinsic single site, a survey study was designed. The concept of 'capital' was explored through an adopted interpretive approach that involved understanding meanings from different sources, for example, discussions at compassion cafés, follow-up from staff-initiated activities, informal responses to organizational imperatives external to the unit (i.e. staff reductions and resource constraints), alongside empirical data about workplace climate and patient incidents. Setting: A single ICU employing approximately 220 registered nurses at a quaternary hospital in Queensland, Australia. Participants: All nurses employed in the ICU at the time of compassion cafes participated in providing feedback to inform successive activities. All nurses in the unit had equal opportunity to complete surveys, participate in subsequent unit-based sessions, take-up options; and all nurses had a responsibility to complete incident data. Results: Survey and incident data from 2015 to 2019 identify the complexity of workplace environments. Between 35% and 45% of nurses consistently completed the survey. Activities based on staff requests initially improved incident data but did not impact the work environment; negative perceptions of the work environment at the endpoint (2019) were associated with external factors. Conclusion: Quality care environments are labile; sensitive to both unit activity and external organization directives (namely staff reductions). Quality care can be sustained in adverse situations with increased nurse engagement in patient care dynamics in the short term. Impact: This study articulates a previously unidentified concept, 'clinical capital'. Activities facilitating nurse engagement in broad care dynamics gave rise to a more robust climate than just focusing on social and psychological well-being activities for nurses. Participation in issues of concern about patient care can promote resilience to short term fluctuations.
Clinical research nursing and factors influencing success: a qualitative study describing the interplay between individual and organisational leadership influences and their impact on the delivery of clinical research in healthcare

Linda Tinkler,Lisa Robinson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120904778

2020-03-18

Journal of Research in Nursing

Abstract:Background Clinical research delivery is a term increasingly used to describe the work undertaken to implement studies which explore and test prevention, diagnosis and treatment in healthcare. Such studies range from multi-site clinical trials to single site observational projects. Whilst widely acknowledged as fundamental to effective healthcare, clinical research is complex to deliver and is met with challenges in the busy clinical environment. The perceptions and experiences of Clinical Research Nurses, whose work is central to this agenda, have emerged as important, yet frequently overlooked insights in relation to the potential success of research delivery. Increased understanding of these insights is essential to address the barriers and maximise facilitators to success in clinical research. Aim To better understand how the perceptions and experiences of Clinical Research Nurses relate to potential for success in research delivery. Methods Seven focus groups and two one-to-one interviews (27 participants) were conducted in a large tertiary North East England National Health Service Foundation Trust between March and June 2017. Results Clinical Research Nurses’ described perceptions and experiences of working to co-ordinate and deliver a range of research as individuals, within their teams, throughout the wider organisation, and beyond. Two key elements situated within an overarching theme of leadership emerged as likely to impact on how successfully they were able to practise: • the individual (self-leadership). • the organisation (leadership culture). Conclusions The framework emerging from this study illustrates a complex interplay between personal attributes and organisational culture, mediated by national strategies and targets associated with the clinical research agenda. When situated within the concept of leadership, it broadens the potential for understanding the underlying issues and increases the range of possible support mechanisms to improve experiences for Clinical Research Nurses. Framing the challenges in this way contributes new knowledge to the dialogue surrounding clinical research delivery.
Medical consultants' experience of collective leadership in complexity: a qualitative interview study

Áine Carroll,Jane McKenzie,Claire Collins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-04-2023-0104

2024-08-19

Abstract:Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore and understand the leadership experiences of medical consultants prior to a major hospital move. Health and care is becoming increasingly complex and there is no greater challenge than the move to a new hospital. Effective leadership has been identified as being essential for successful transition. However, there is very little evidence of how medical consultants experience effective leadership. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative methodology was utilized with one-to-one semi-structured interviews conducted with ten medical consultants. These were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. The research complied with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ). Findings: Four themes were found to influence medical consultants' experience of leadership: collaboration, patient centredness, governance and knowledge mobilization. Various factors were identified that negatively influenced their leadership effectiveness. The findings suggest that there are a number of factors that influence complexity leadership effectiveness. Addressing these areas may enhance leadership effectiveness and the experience of leadership in medical consultants. Research limitations/implications: This study provides a rich exploration of medical consultants' experience of collective leadership prior to a transition to a new hospital and provides new understandings of the way collective leadership is experienced in the lead up to a major transition and makes recommendations for future leadership research and practice. Practical implications: The findings suggest that there are a number of factors that influence complexity leadership effectiveness. Addressing these areas may enhance leadership effectiveness and the experience of leadership in medical consultants. Social implications: Clinical leadership is associated with better outcomes for patients therefore any interventions that enhance leadership capability will improve outcomes for patients and therefore benefit society. Originality/value: This is the first research to explore medical consultants' experience of collective leadership prior to a transition to a new hospital.
Retaining doctors in emergency medicine: an ethnographic study of emergency departments in England

Darbyshire,D.,Brewster,L.,Isba,R.,Body,R.,Goodwin,D.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086733

IF: 3.006

2024-09-20

BMJ Open

Abstract:Objectives To gain a deep understanding of factors driving retention in emergency medicine. To understand in detail the day-to-day lived experience of emergency medicine doctors, to identify and explore factors influencing retention, to situate these descriptions within the current educational and health policy contexts and to advance the debate and make policy and practice recommendations. Design Ethnography and semistructured interviews. Setting Two purposively sampled emergency departments in England, with additional interview participants recruited via social media and relevant stakeholder organisations. Participants 41 interview participants comprising 21 emergency physicians across 2 sites, 10 former emergency physicians and 10 stakeholders, with 132 hours of observation over 11 weeks in one emergency department in England. Results Three key themes were developed as relevant to the day-to-day lived experience of work in the emergency department, presenting challenges to retention and opportunities for change. First, emergency physicians needed to develop workarounds to mitigate the sensory and material challenges of working in a difficult environment. Second, education influences retention through valuing, fostering competence and entrustment and supporting interdependence. These were primarily observable in the workplace through senior staff prioritising the education of more junior staff. Third, community was important for retention. Linked to education through communities of practice, it was built by brief interpersonal interactions between emergency department workers. Situating these descriptions in current policy contexts identified less than full-time working, portfolio careers and mentorship as retention strategies. Self-rostering and annualisation facilitated these retention strategies. Conclusions The emergency department represents a difficult environment with many challenges, yet by focusing on how doctors navigate these difficulties, we can see the way in which retention occurs in everyday practices, and that valuing staff is critical for retention.

medicine, general & internal
The Clinical Teaching Fellow role: exploring expectations and experiences

Isobel Marion Harris,Heather McNeilly,Derek J. Ward,Alice J. Sitch,Jayne Parry,Sheila Greenfield

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05207-6

IF: 3.263

2024-03-03

BMC Medical Education

Abstract:Many UK junior doctors are now taking a year out of the traditional training pathway, usually before specialty training, and some choose to work as a clinical teaching fellow (CTF). CTFs primarily have responsibility for delivering hospital-based teaching to undergraduate medical students. Only a very small amount of literature is available regarding CTF posts, none of which has explored why doctors choose to undertake the role and their expectations of the job. This study aimed to explore the expectations and experiences of CTFs employed at NHS hospital Trusts in the West Midlands.

education & educational research,education, scientific disciplines
Clinical supervision, a reflective intervention to support new graduate nurses and midwives enhance their person-centredness: qualitative evaluation

Denise Edgar,Tracey Moroney,Rebekkah Middleton,Valerie Wilson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2024.2392575

2024-08-26

Abstract:Person-centred care is an international healthcare priority. Strategies are needed to support nurses and midwives to understand the meaning of person-centredness and support them to embed this philosophy into practice. Clinical supervision has been proposed as a strategy to support this but requires more evidence.The aim of this research was to evaluate a newly developed model of clinical supervision, underpinned by person-centred practice theory, to enhance the person-centred practices of new graduate nurses and midwives. Design: Qualitative study (embedded within a mixed methods study) using focus groupsMethods: Group, online clinical supervision (named C.A.R.E.) underpinned by the Person-centred Practice Framework was provided to 103 new graduate nurses and midwives once per month for one hour, over six months. The researchers used [Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis; A practical guide. SAGE]. Thematic Analysis to analyse data. Results: Twenty one participated in the qualitative evaluation. Four themes were identified (1) Person-centredness in Action (person-centredness experienced and delivered by the new graduates) (2) Enhancing the Transitioning Toolkit (professional and personal growth as an outcome of reflection and learning together) (3) The Transitioning Environment (care environment and C.A.R.E. environment) and (4) Challenges to C.A.R.E. (team and organisation, and personal). Conclusion: This supportive safe space allowed new graduates to explore their and other's practices, in relation to person-centred practice theory. Through sharing their experiences, they increased their knowledge and confidence to incorporate new learning into their own practice. This clinical supervision model underpinned by the Person-centred Practice Framework provides person-centred benefits to the new graduates, patients and families. However, without organisational support the benefits will not be realised.
A metasynthesis of nurses and midwives' experiences of clinical supervision

Christine Catling,Rachel Davey,Helen Donovan,Ann Dadich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2023.10.005

Abstract:Problem: Given the current rate of burnout and attrition among nurses and midwives globally, there is a need to understand the effectiveness of supportive strategies to help retain this workforce. Background: Clinical supervision can help to ensure that nurses and midwives are supported and have the capacity to cope with their job demands. Yet there are no metasyntheses that provide a collective understanding of their experiences with clinical supervision. Aim: To synthesise the experiences of nurses and midwives who have accessed clinical supervision. Methods: A metasynthesis was conducted by systematically searching academic databases for relevant publications; assessing their quality using an established checklist; extracting and analysing qualitative content; and synthesising key findings about the experiences of nurses and midwives regarding clinical supervision. Findings: Themes and subthemes were identified from 12 papers, including: optimal logistics; support; safety and confidentiality; improving practice through reflection; and trust in the group. Discussion: For clinicians to feel comfortable discussing their practice and workplace with the facilitator and colleagues, nurses and midwives needed to feel safe during clinical supervision and trust the process and their peers. Despite common difficulties of finding time for the sessions, clinical supervision can enhance collaboration and communication in the workplace. Conclusion: Clinical supervision that adheres to group rules can provide professional support within a safe, confidential space. Having trust in peers and facilitators at the sessions can help staff develop confidence, provide personal development and professional sustenance.

Being a junior clinical director: five minutes with . . . Lauren Carter.

Junior Doctor Retention Strategies: Integrating Knowledge Management with Supportive Leadership and Organizational Climate

Clinical leadership development in postgraduate medical education and training: policy, strategy, and delivery in the UK National Health Service

A research internship scheme for nurses and its wider implications for clinical managers

Junior doctors' workplace well-being and the determinants based on ability-motivation-opportunity (AMO) theory: Educational and managerial implications from a three-year longitudinal observation after graduation

The challenges of becoming and being a clinician manager: a qualitative exploration of the perception of medical doctors in senior leadership roles at a large Australian health service

Experiences of Public Doctors on Managing Work Difficulties and Maintaining Professional Enthusiasm in Acute General Hospitals: A Qualitative Study

Engaging and developing front-line clinical nurses to drive care excellence: Evaluating the Chief Nurse Excellence in Care Junior Fellowship initiative

Junior Doctors Are Key to Scrutiny of Hospitals, Says Chief Inspector

Residents as supervisors: How senior residents make ad hoc entrustment decisions

Qualitative study of new doctor induction and socialisation

Innovative recruitment and clinical orientation programme to manage NHS junior doctor shortfall: A district hospital experience

Future Hospital Commission, 10 years on - Lessons learned and next steps: The Chief Registrar Programme - what has been achieved?

Junior academic‐manager in higher education: an untold story?

Towards the idea of 'clinical capital': A longitudinal study exploring nurses' dispositions and workplace manifestations in an Australian intensive care unit

Clinical research nursing and factors influencing success: a qualitative study describing the interplay between individual and organisational leadership influences and their impact on the delivery of clinical research in healthcare

Medical consultants' experience of collective leadership in complexity: a qualitative interview study

Retaining doctors in emergency medicine: an ethnographic study of emergency departments in England

The Clinical Teaching Fellow role: exploring expectations and experiences

Clinical supervision, a reflective intervention to support new graduate nurses and midwives enhance their person-centredness: qualitative evaluation

A metasynthesis of nurses and midwives' experiences of clinical supervision