Abstract:Directly comparing the 6 expansion rate measured by type Ia supernovae data and the lower bound on the expansion rate set by the strong energy conditions or the null hypothesis that there never exists cosmic acceleration, we see 3σ direct evidence of cosmic acceleration and the Rh=ct model is strongly excluded by the type Ia supernovae data. We also use Gaussian process method to reconstruct the expansion rate and the deceleration parameter from the 31 cosmic chronometers data and the 6 data points on the expansion rate measured from type Ia supernoave data, the direct evidence of cosmic acceleration is more than 3σ and we find that the transition redshift zt=0.60−0.12+0.21 at which the expansion of the Universe underwent the transition from acceleration to deceleration. The Hubble constant inferred from the cosmic chronometers data with the Gaussian process method is H0=67.46±4.75 Km/s/Mpc. To understand the properties of cosmic acceleration and dark energy, we fit two different two-parameter models to the observational data, and we find that the constraints on the model parameters from either the full distance modulus data by the Pantheon compilation or the compressed expansion rate data are very similar, and the derived Hubble constants are consistent with the Planck 2018 result. Our results confirm that the 6 compressed expansion rate data can replace the full 1048 distance modulus data from the Pantheon compilation. We derive the transition redshift zt=0.61−0.16+0.24 by fitting a simple q(z) model to the combination of cosmic chronometers data and the Pantheon compilation, the result is consistent with that obtained from the reconstruction with Gaussian process. By fitting the observational data by the SSLCPL model which approximates the dynamics of general thawing scalar fields over a large redshift range, we obtain that H0=66.8± 1.4, Ω 0=0.69± 0.01 and w0=−1.03± 0.07. The result shows that ΛCDM model is consistent with the observational data.

Searching for the Evidence of Dynamical Dark Energy

Dynamical Dark Energy Beyond Planck? Constraints from multiple CMB probes, DESI BAO and Type-Ia Supernovae

Generalized emergent dark energy in the late-time Universe

Probing Dark Energy Evolution Post-DESI 2024

Dark Energy Constraints from Pantheon+ Ia Supernovae Data

Improved Constraints on the Dark Energy Equation of State Using Gaussian Processes

Can early dark energy be probed by the high-redshift galaxy abundance?

Exploring the expansion dynamics of the universe from galaxy cluster surveys

No Evidence for Dynamical Dark Energy in Two Models

Oscillations in the Dark?

Evaluating a Sigmoid Dark Energy Model to Explain the Hubble Tension

The evidence of cosmic acceleration and observational constraints

Exploring new physics in the late Universe's expansion through non-parametric inference

Dark energy reconstructions combining BAO data with galaxy clusters and intermediate redshift catalogs

Observational evidence for Early Dark Energy as a unified explanation for Cosmic Birefringence and the Hubble tension

Towards primordial gravitational waves and $n_s=1$ in light of BICEP/Keck, DESI BAO and Hubble tension

On the evidence of dynamical dark energy

Scale-dependence in $Λ$CDM parameters inferred from the CMB: a possible sign of Early Dark Energy