Abstract:Directly comparing the 6 expansion rate measured by type Ia supernovae data and the lower bound on the expansion rate set by the strong energy conditions or the null hypothesis that there never exists cosmic acceleration, we see 3σ direct evidence of cosmic acceleration and the Rh=ct model is strongly excluded by the type Ia supernovae data. We also use Gaussian process method to reconstruct the expansion rate and the deceleration parameter from the 31 cosmic chronometers data and the 6 data points on the expansion rate measured from type Ia supernoave data, the direct evidence of cosmic acceleration is more than 3σ and we find that the transition redshift zt=0.60−0.12+0.21 at which the expansion of the Universe underwent the transition from acceleration to deceleration. The Hubble constant inferred from the cosmic chronometers data with the Gaussian process method is H0=67.46±4.75 Km/s/Mpc. To understand the properties of cosmic acceleration and dark energy, we fit two different two-parameter models to the observational data, and we find that the constraints on the model parameters from either the full distance modulus data by the Pantheon compilation or the compressed expansion rate data are very similar, and the derived Hubble constants are consistent with the Planck 2018 result. Our results confirm that the 6 compressed expansion rate data can replace the full 1048 distance modulus data from the Pantheon compilation. We derive the transition redshift zt=0.61−0.16+0.24 by fitting a simple q(z) model to the combination of cosmic chronometers data and the Pantheon compilation, the result is consistent with that obtained from the reconstruction with Gaussian process. By fitting the observational data by the SSLCPL model which approximates the dynamics of general thawing scalar fields over a large redshift range, we obtain that H0=66.8± 1.4, Ω 0=0.69± 0.01 and w0=−1.03± 0.07. The result shows that ΛCDM model is consistent with the observational data.

No Evidence for Dynamical Dark Energy in Two Models

Dark Energy Constraints in light of the Pantheon Type Ia Supernovae Sample

Searching for the Evidence of Dynamical Dark Energy

Evidence of dynamical dark energy in a non-flat universe: current and future observations

Dynamical dark energy in light of cosmic distance measurements II: a study using current observations

Exploring the expansion dynamics of the universe from galaxy cluster surveys

Suggestions of decreasing dark energy from supernova and BAO data

The evidence of cosmic acceleration and observational constraints

Comparison of dark energy models: A perspective from the latest observational data

Observational Constraints and Diagnostics for Time-Dependent Dark Energy Models

Evidence of Dark Energy Prior to its Discovery

Does the Hubble constant tension call for new physics?

A new diagnostic for the null test of dynamical dark energy in light of DESI 2024 and other BAO data

Dark energy constraints from Pantheon+ Ia supernovae data

Constraining the Evolution of Dark Energy with Type Ia Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts

Holographic motivations and observational evidence for decreasing dark energy