Abstract:Consumers in real world sometimes face situations in which information about unavailable products is still present in the decision contexts. For example, consumers may find that certain options are sold out and thus marked by an out-of-stock stamp in such a way that consumers can still examine their attributes information. Traditional models of consumer choices have assumed that the addition of an unavailable alternative to a choice set has no impact on the shares among the original alternatives. However, recent studies on asymmetrical dominance choice sets suggest that adding an alternative that asymmetrically dominates a targeted alternative and is declared to be unavailable increases preference for the target in the original choice set. Three categories of theories, range-weighting, similarity-substitution and relative-advantage, have been used to explain the phenomenon. Despite prior research interest in extending attraction effect in unavailability context, little is understood about how unavailable options influence preferences among available options in other choice settings. Dominant literature have advocate for the preference for the compromised option in a three-option set. Thus, it is typical that the unavailable option is the compromised one. The above three explanations all fail to predict the preference on the remaining options in this situation. We propose that consumers are experiencing increasing decision difficulty or feeling greater conflict deciding in the unavailable compromise set than in the two-option set, and thus are likely to alleviate this negative task-related emotion by engaging in conflict-reducing heuristics. In particular, if choice of the compromise option that is associated with smallest maximum error or likelihood of being criticized is impossible, consumers forced to make difficult trade-offs among extremes are likely to rely more on the unambiguous attribute in the evaluations, because unambiguous outcome is associated with a lower likelihood of criticism. Thus, consumers seek to guarantee (avoid) advantages (disadvantages) of their selected option in precision rather than in ambiguity. Based on findings that attributes in quantitative nature (e.g., price) are easier to trade-off than attributes (e.g., quality) in qualitative nature, we predict that the relative preferences for low-quality, low-price option which has a precise and certain advantage will be stronger in presence than in absence of an unavailable intermediate option. Study 1 establishes that the addition of an unavailable compromise option into a two-option local set can increase the relative share of the cheaper option. In Study 2, we demonstrate that the degree to which the quality advantage (disadvantage) can be ambiguously evaluated moderates this effect. When the value of quality becomes less ambiguous to evaluate (providing experts' quality evaluations, Study 2A) or more ambiguous to evaluate (describing product quality by a range of performance, Study 2B), the effect that the cheaper option fares better in the unavailable middle option set attenuates or strengthens. Study 3 further examines the underlying mechanism by testing the moderating effect of consumer product knowledge, and the mediating effect of decision conflict. We conclude with a discussion of the theoretical and managerial implications.

Effectiveness of Trade-Ins and Price Discounts: A Moderating Role of Substitutability

Trade‐in for Cash or for Upgrade? Dynamic Pricing with Customer Choice

Optimal trade-in strategy for advance selling with strategic consumers proportion

Dynamic Pricing in a Trade‐in Program with Replacement and New Customers

Price Presentation Effects in Purchases Involving Trade-Ins

Optimal pricing strategy under trade-in program in the presence of strategic consumers

OPTIMAL PRICING AND INVENTORY STRATEGIES FOR INTRODUCING A NEW PRODUCT BASED ON DEMAND SUBSTITUTION EFFECTS

Understanding the Role of Trade-Ins in Durable Goods Markets: Theory and Evidence

Production Quality and Pricing Strategy for Substitutable Products under Comparison Effects

Can the Love for Promotional Offering Be Easily Substituted? Impact of Promotional Out-of-Stock of New Products on Consumer's Response to Recommendation of Similar Alternatives

Pricing strategy for the automobile producer considering consumer anxiety behavior and policy substitution effect

Effects of Discount Retraction on Consumers' Subsequent Brand Choice: Moderating Role of Discount Size

Joint Advertisement and Trade-In Marketing Strategy in Closed-Loop Supply Chain

On the Non-Equivalence of Trade-Ins and Upgrades in the Presence of Reference Dependence: Experimental Evidence and Implications for Theory

Effects of product substitutability and power relationships on performance in triadic supply chains

Trade-in strategy for durable products in the presence of a peer-to-peer second-hand marketplace

Effects of Price Discounts and Bonus Packs on Online Impulse Buying

Quality or price? The effect of stock-out middle option on consumer choices

On the Non‐Equivalence of Trade‐ins and Upgrades in the Presence of Framing Effect: Experimental Evidence and Implications for Theory

Asserting Your Mind: Interruptions Extremize Consumer Choices

Understanding the Substitution Effect Between Online and Traditional Channels: Evidence from Product Attributes Perspective.