Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To investigate the comparison of curative effects in treating proximal humerus fractures' patients between minimally invasive locking plate internal fixation and open reduction with internal fixation, and to provide guidance for the operation method of the proximal humerus fracture patients.METHODS:In the study, 157 patients of proximal humerus fractures from May 2006 to December 2012 in Peking University Third Hospital were analyzed retrospectively, of whom 78 were followed up, including 19 males and 59 females. They were from 15 to 90 years old, with the mean age of 60.5 years. According to Neer classification, there were 53 cases of two-part fractures, 19 cases of three-part fractures and 6 cases of four-part fractures. According to AO classification, there were 49 cases of type A,21 cases of type B and 8 cases of type C. There were 24 cases treated with minimally invasive locking plate internal fixation operation and 54 cases treated with open reduction with internal fixation operation. The patients were followed up with postoperative physical examinations and X ray examinations. Postoperative shoulder pain after 1 week and more than 6 months was assessed using the VAS score. Postoperative shoulder joint function with the use of Constant-Murley score and ASES score were evaluated after 3 months and more than 6 months. The results were analyzed by SPSS 18.0.RESULTS:The follow-up time was 6 to 85 months, with the mean time of 33.8 months. According to the rank sum test: there were significant differences in operation time (P=0.002), postoperative hospital day (P=0.001), the satisfaction of patients (P=0.029), postoperative shoulder pain after 1 week (P=0.024), postoperative Constant-Murley score after 3 months (P=0.012) and postoperative ASES score after 3 months (P=0.001) between minimally invasive group and non-minimally invasive group. There weren't significant differences in clinical union time of bone (P=0.446), postoperative shoulder pain after more than 6 months (P=0.894), postoperative Constant-Murley score after more than 6 months (P=0.122) and postoperative ASES score after more than 6 months (P=0.351) between minimally invasive group and non-minimally invasive group. There were no breakage of the internal fixation and humeral head osteonecrosis. Minimally invasive group had 2 cases with internal fixation loosening (8.3%) and 1 case with complete limitation of abduction (4.2%). Non-minimally invasive group had 1 case with tracture nonunion (1.9%), 1 case with internal fixation loosening (1.9%) and 1 case with complete limitation of abduction (1.9%).CONCLUSION:The operation method of proximal humerus fractures is an important factor affecting the recovery of shoulder joint function. Minimally invasive locking plate internal fixation operation in early stage (1 week) of pain control, early (3 months) functional recovery, operation time, postoperative hospital day and patient satisfaction are better than those of traditional operation.

Comparison between minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open plating for proximal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis.

Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Locking Plate and Traditional Open Reduction with Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures

[Comparison of Curative Effects Between Minimally Invasive Locking Plate Internal Fixation and Open Reduction with Internal Fixation for the Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures].

Comparison between osteosynthesis with interlocking nail and minimally invasive plating for proximal- and middle-thirds of humeral shaft fractures

Plating osteosynthesis of mid-distal humeral shaft fractures: minimally invasive versus conventional open reduction technique

Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis with A Locking Compression Plate is Superior to Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in the Management of the Proximal Humerus Fractures

Intramedullary nail versus locking plate for treatment of proximal humeral fractures: A meta-analysis based on 1384 individuals.

Antegrade locked intramedullary nailing versus dynamic compression plating for humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis

Minimally invasive and open reduction plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures：range of motion of the shoulder joint

Meta-analysis of the Outcomes of Intramedullary Nailing and Plate Fixation of Humeral Shaft Fractures

Orthogonal Plating Method Versus Parallel Plating Method in the Treatment of Distal Humerus Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A meta-analysis of plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures

Treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a new minimally-invasive plate osteosynthesis versus open reduction and internal fixation: a case control study

Antegrade Locked Intramedullary Nailing Versus Dynamic Compression Plating for Humeral Shaft Fractures in Adults: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Comparison of Clinical Effect on Locking Plate for Proximal Humeral Fracture with or Without Application of Inferomedial Screws

Effect of minimally invasive percutaneous plates versus interlocking intramedullary nailing in tibial shaft treatment for fractures in adults: A meta-analysis

Effect of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis on humeral shaft fractures

Comparison of intramedullary nailing fixation and percutaneous locked plating fixation for the treatment of proximal tibial fractures: A meta-analysis

Comparison of effectiveness between minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis and expandable intramedullary nailing technique in treatment of middle third humeral shaft fractures]

Effects of different surgical techniques on mid-distal humeral shaft vascularity: open reduction and internal fixation versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis

Intramedullary nail versus dynamic compression plate fixation in treating humeral shaft fractures: grading the evidence through a meta-analysis.