Effect of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis on humeral shaft fractures

Fengxiang LIU,Zhiqing LIU,Jian TANG,Weihua GONG,Chao YU,Yuehua SUN,Zhen'an ZHU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2018.06.005

2018-01-01

Abstract:Background: Humeral shaft fracture is one of the common upper limb injuries. Minimally invasive plate osteo-synthesis (MIPO) has been successful in managing various long tubular bone fractures of lower extremity due to the biolog-ic superiority with less stripping and higher bone union rate. In the upper limb, however, MIPO technique has not been com-monly used because of the complex anatomy of the neurovascular structures. Objective: To compare the clinical and radio-logic results and hazards of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and MIPO in treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Methods: From February 2012 to February 2017, 61 patients with humeral shaft fractures were treated with ORIF (ORIF group, 31 cases) or MIPO (MIPO group, 30 cases). The operation time, radiation exposure time, bone healing time, and in-tra-and postoperative complications were recorded. The upper limb functions were evaluated according to the DASH scor-ing system. Results: There was no significant difference in the demographic data of the patients between the two groups (P>0.05). Postoperative X-ray photography confirmed satisfactory fracture reduction and internal fixation in all patients. Com-plications included 2 partial radial nerve palsies (ORIF group), 2 delayed unions (ORIF group), and 2 superficial infections (1 case in each group). Implant failure, deep infection, malunion and nonunion were not observed in any patients. There was no significant difference in the operation time or incidence of the complications between two groups (P>0.05). The radiation exposure time was longer (P<0.01), whereas the bone healing time was shorter (P<0.05) in the MIPO group than those in the ORIF group. Although excellent functional outcomes were achieved in both groups at 6 months postoperatively and fi-nal visit (P>0.05), the upper limb functions evaluated with DASH scores in the MIPO group were superior to those in the ORIF group at 6 and 12 weeks follow-up (P<0.05, P<0.01, respectively). Conclusions: This study confirms a high overall rate of bone union and excellent functional outcomes in both MIPO and ORIF groups. MIPO results in faster union, faster rehabilitation, more aesthetic incision, and should be considered as an alternative option to the conventional ORIF tech-nique. However, the faculty and patient should be protected against radiation exposure during fracture management.