The Accuracy of Citizen Science Data: A Quantitative Review

Eréndira Aceves‐Bueno,Adeyemi S. Adeleye,Marina Feraud,Yuxiong Huang,Mengya Tao,Yi Yang,Sarah E. Anderson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1336

2017-01-01

Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America

Abstract:Author(s): Aceves-Bueno, Erendira; Adeleye, Adeyemi S; Feraud, Marina; Huang, Yuxiong; Tao, Mengya; Yang, Yi; Anderson, Sarah E

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Assessing data quality in citizen science (preprint)

Margaret Kosmala,Andrea Wiggins,Alexandra Swanson,Brooke Simmons

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/074104

2016-09-08

Abstract:Abstract Ecological and environmental citizen science projects have enormous potential to advance science, influence policy, and guide resource management by producing datasets that are otherwise infeasible to generate. This potential can only be realized, though, if the datasets are of high quality. While scientists are often skeptical of the ability of unpaid volunteers to produce accurate datasets, a growing body of publications clearly shows that diverse types of citizen science projects can produce data with accuracy equal to or surpassing that of professionals. Successful projects rely on a suite of methods to boost data accuracy and account for bias, including iterative project development, volunteer training and testing, expert validation, replication across volunteers, and statistical modeling of systematic error. Each citizen science dataset should therefore be judged individually, according to project design and application, rather than assumed to be substandard simply because volunteers generated it.
Quantifying online citizen science: Dynamics and demographics of public participation in science

Bruno J Strasser,Elise Tancoigne,Jérôme Baudry,Steven Piguet,Helen Spiers,José Luis-Fernandez Marquez,Jérôme Kasparian,François Grey,David Anderson,Chris Lintott

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293289

IF: 3.7

2023-11-21

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Citizen scientists around the world are collecting data with their smartphones, performing scientific calculations on their home computers, and analyzing images on online platforms. These online citizen science projects are frequently lauded for their potential to revolutionize the scope and scale of data collection and analysis, improve scientific literacy, and democratize science. Yet, despite the attention online citizen science has attracted, it remains unclear how widespread public participation is, how it has changed over time, and how it is geographically distributed. Importantly, the demographic profile of citizen science participants remains uncertain, and thus to what extent their contributions are helping to democratize science. Here, we present the largest quantitative study of participation in citizen science based on online accounts of more than 14 million participants over two decades. We find that the trend of broad rapid growth in online citizen science participation observed in the early 2000s has since diverged by mode of participation, with consistent growth observed in nature sensing, but a decline seen in crowdsourcing and distributed computing. Most citizen science projects, except for nature sensing, are heavily dominated by men, and the vast majority of participants, male and female, have a background in science. The analysis we present here provides, for the first time, a robust 'baseline' to describe global trends in online citizen science participation. These results highlight current challenges and the future potential of citizen science. Beyond presenting our analysis of the collated data, our work identifies multiple metrics for robust examination of public participation in science and, more generally, online crowds. It also points to the limits of quantitative studies in capturing the personal, societal, and historical significance of citizen science.
Citizen Science As an Approach for Overcoming Insufficient Monitoring and Inadequate Stakeholder Buy-in in Adaptive Management: Criteria and Evidence

Eréndira Aceves-Bueno,Adeyemi S. Adeleye,Darcy Bradley,W. Tyler Brandt,Patrick Callery,Marina Feraud,Kendra L. Garner,Rebecca Gentry,Yuxiong Huang,Ian McCullough,Isaac Pearlman,Sara A. Sutherland,Whitney Wilkinson,Yi Yang,Trevor Zink,Sarah E. Anderson,Christina Tague

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-015-9842-4

2015-01-01

Ecosystems

Abstract:Adaptive management is broadly recognized as critical for managing natural resources, yet in practice it often fails to achieve intended results for two main reasons: insufficient monitoring and inadequate stakeholder buy-in. Citizen science is gaining momentum as an approach that can inform natural resource management and has some promise for solving the problems faced by adaptive management. Based on adaptive management literature, we developed a set of criteria for successfully addressing monitoring and stakeholder related failures in adaptive management and then used these criteria to evaluate 83 citizen science case studies from peer-reviewed literature. The results suggest that citizen science can be a cost-effective method to collect essential monitoring information and can also produce the high levels of citizen engagement that are vital to the adaptive management learning process. The analysis also provides a set of recommendations for citizen science program design that addresses spatial and temporal scale, data quality, costs, and effective incentives to facilitate participation and integration of findings into adaptive management.
Citizen silence: Missed opportunities in citizen science

Damon M Hall,Pedro M Avellaneda-Lopez,Darren L Ficklin,Jason H Knouft,Christopher Lowry

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae020

IF: 10.1

2024-03-27

BioScience

Abstract:Abstract Citizen science is personal. Participation is contingent on the citizens’ connection to a topic or to interpersonal relationships meaningful to them. But from the peer-reviewed literature, scientists appear to have an acquisitive data-centered relationship with citizens. This has spurred ethical and pragmatic criticisms of extractive relationships with citizen scientists. We suggest five practical steps to shift citizen-science research from extractive to relational, reorienting the research process and providing reciprocal benefits to researchers and citizen scientists. By virtue of their interests and experience within their local environments, citizen scientists have expertise that, if engaged, can improve research methods and product design decisions. To boost the value of scientific outputs to society and participants, citizen-science research teams should rethink how they engage and value volunteers.

biology
A Method for Conveying Confidence in iNaturalist Observations: A Case Study Using Non‐Native Marine Species

Sarah J. Ackland,David M. Richardson,Tamara B. Robinson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70376

IF: 3.167

2024-10-09

Ecology and Evolution

Abstract:Data quality, reliability and accuracy have long been recognised as barriers to unlocking the full potential of citizen science derived data. This study developed a score to assign confidence in iNaturalist observations and streamline the verification process. Concerns and limitations relating to data quality, reliability and accuracy hamper the use of citizen science initiatives in research and conservation. Valued for their cost‐effective and large data acquisition potential, citizen science platforms such as iNaturalist have been highlighted as beneficial tools to supplement monitoring using traditional data sources. However, intrinsic uncertainties in unverified observations stem from the nature of species being identified, the quality of uploaded media and georeferencing; these factors can limit the value of the data as they can result in inaccurate records. Verification of data prior to use is critical. This process can, however, be laborious and time‐consuming, with bias associated with the individual responsible for the task. To address this challenge this study developed a protocol for assigning confidence in iNaturalist observations, using marine alien and cryptogenic species observations from South Africa as a case study. A positive relationship was found between the accuracy of observations and confidence score. The inherent data quality assessment in iNaturalist, termed quality grade, was found to be an inadequate proxy for accuracy. The results of this study highlight the importance of the expert verification phase when using citizen science data. The confidence score facilitates a streamlined approach to the verification process by reducing the time taken to validate records, while assessing the three levels of uncertainty within observations and reducing researcher bias. It is recommended that this confidence score be used as an essential tool when using citizen science derived data.

ecology,evolutionary biology
Citizen Science: An Information Quality Research Frontier

Roman Lukyanenko,Andrea Wiggins,Holly K. Rosser

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.08289

2019-05-20

Computers and Society

Abstract:The rapid proliferation of online content producing and sharing technologies resulted in an explosion of user-generated content (UGC), which now extends to scientific data. Citizen science, in which ordinary people contribute information for scientific research, epitomizes UGC. Citizen science projects are typically open to everyone, engage diverse audiences, and challenge ordinary people to produce data of highest quality to be usable in science. This also makes citizen science a very exciting area to study both traditional and innovative approaches to information quality management. With this paper we position citizen science as a leading information quality research frontier. We also show how citizen science opens a unique opportunity for the information systems community to contribute to a broad range of disciplines in natural and social sciences and humanities.
Integrating citizen science data with expert surveys increases accuracy and spatial extent of species distribution models

Orin J. Robinson,Viviana. Ruiz‐Gutierrez,Mark D. Reynolds,Gregory H. Golet,Matthew Strimas‐Mackey,Daniel Fink

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13068

2020-05-07

Diversity and Distributions

Abstract:AimInformation on species' habitat associations and distributions, across a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, is a fundamental source of ecological knowledge. However, collecting information at relevant scales is often cost prohibitive, although it is essential for framing the broader context of more focused research and conservation efforts. Citizen science has been signalled as an increasingly important source to fill in data gaps where information is needed to make comprehensive and robust inferences on species distributions. However, there are perceived trade‐offs of combining highly structured, scientific survey data with largely un‐structured, citizen science data. MethodsWe explore these trade‐offs by applying a simplified approach of filtering citizen science data to resemble structured survey data and analyse both sources of data under a common framework. To accomplish this, we integrated high‐resolution survey data on shorebirds in the northern Central Valley of California with observations in eBird for the entire region that were filtered to improve their quality. ResultsThe integration of survey data with the filtered citizen science data resulted in improved inference and increased the extent and accuracy of distribution models on shorebirds for the Central Valley. The structured surveys improved the overall accuracy of ecological inference over models using citizen science data only by increasing the representation of data collected from high‐quality habitats for shorebirds. Main conclusionsThe practical approach we have shown for data integration can also be used to improve the efficiency of designing biological surveys in the context of larger, citizen science monitoring efforts, ultimately reducing the financial and time expenditures typically required of monitoring programs and focused research. The simple method we present can be used to integrate other types of data with more localized efforts, ultimately improving our ecological knowledge on the distribution and habitat associations of species of conservation concern worldwide.

biodiversity conservation,ecology
Citizen science: How to extend reciprocal benefits from the project community to the broader socio-ecological system

Aurore Receveur,Lucie Poulet,Benjamin Dalmas,Barbara Gonçalves,Antoine Vernay

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/qpb.2022.16

2022-10-05

Quantitative Plant Biology

Abstract:Quantitative plant biology is a growing field, thanks to the substantial progress of models and artificial intelligence dealing with big data. However, collecting large enough datasets is not always straightforward. The citizen science approach can multiply the workforce, hence helping the researchers with data collection and analysis, while also facilitating the spread of scientific knowledge and methods to volunteers. The reciprocal benefits go far beyond the project community: By empowering volunteers and increasing the robustness of scientific results, the scientific method spreads to the socio-ecological scale. This review aims to demonstrate that citizen science has a huge potential (i) for science with the development of different tools to collect and analyse much larger datasets, (ii) for volunteers by increasing their involvement in the project governance and (iii) for the socio-ecological system by increasing the share of the knowledge, thanks to a cascade effect and the help of 'facilitators'.

English Else
Assessing adequacy of citizen science datasets for biodiversity monitoring

Louis J. Backstrom,Corey T. Callaghan,Nicholas P. Leseberg,Chris Sanderson,Richard A. Fuller,James E. M. Watson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10857

IF: 3.167

2024-02-02

Ecology and Evolution

Abstract:Tracking the state of biodiversity over time is critical to successful conservation, but conventional monitoring schemes tend to be insufficient to adequately quantify how species' abundances and distributions are changing. One solution to this issue is to leverage data generated by citizen scientists, who collect vast quantities of data at temporal and spatial scales that cannot be matched by most traditional monitoring methods. However, the quality of citizen science data can vary greatly. In this paper, we develop three metrics (inventory completeness, range completeness, spatial bias) to assess the adequacy of spatial observation data. We explore the adequacy of citizen science data at the species level for Australia's terrestrial native birds and then model these metrics against a suite of seven species traits (threat status, taxonomic uniqueness, body mass, average count, range size, species density, and human population density) to identify predictors of data adequacy. We find that citizen science data adequacy for Australian birds is increasing across two of our metrics (inventory completeness and range completeness), but not spatial bias, which has worsened over time. Relationships between the three metrics and seven traits we modelled were variable, with only two traits having consistently significant relationships across the three metrics. Our results suggest that although citizen science data adequacy has generally increased over time, there are still gaps in the spatial adequacy of citizen science for monitoring many Australian birds. Despite these gaps, citizen science can play an important role in biodiversity monitoring by providing valuable baseline data that may be supplemented by information collected through other methods. We believe the metrics presented here constitute an easily applied approach to assessing the utility of citizen science datasets for biodiversity analyses, allowing researchers to identify and prioritise regions or species with lower data adequacy that will benefit most from targeted monitoring efforts.

ecology,evolutionary biology
Assessing citizen science data quality for bird monitoring in the Iberian Peninsula

J Prenda,J L Domínguez-Olmedo,E López-Lozano,R Fernández de Villarán,J J Negro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70827-3

2024-09-02

Abstract:Citizen science data on biodiversity has experienced significant growth, largely driven by advancements in technology that facilitate data sharing. In recent years, mobile applications have provided a substantial boost to both the collection and sharing of this data. While this accessible information is undoubtedly valuable, we must consider the numerous biases present in this data when used for high-quality research. In this study, we analyse citizen science data for the birds of the Iberian Peninsula, comprising over 23 million unique records after filtering for duplicates (i.e., instances where the same observation was uploaded more than once). Using a 10 × 10 km square grid, we present information on well-surveyed cells (completeness) as well as temporal, taxonomic, geographical, and land use coverages. We found that the completeness of information is generally high, with better coverage around densely populated areas such as major cities and coastal regions, as well as popular birding destinations, which are frequently visited. The Mediterranean ecoregion and wetlands exhibit the highest levels of surveying. Furthermore, we observed an increase in temporal coverage since the 1980s and broad taxonomic coverage across all bird orders in the Iberian region. Our results underscore the utility of citizen science for many locations, as expressed in 10 × 10 km cells. However, they also highlight the inadequate data completeness across part of the territory, particularly in forested or sparsely inhabited areas. These findings not only identify cells suitable for bird diversity or conservation studies but also indicate areas where citizen-driven bird recording efforts should be encouraged.
Citizen science as a valuable tool for environmental review

Corey T Callaghan,Carly Winnebald,Blaze Smith,Brittany M Mason,Laura López‐Hoffman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2808

2024-10-12

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Abstract:Human development and population growth are placing immense pressure on natural ecosystems, necessitating the establishment of a balance between development and biodiversity preservation. Citizen science may serve as a valuable resource for monitoring biodiversity and informing decision‐making processes, but its use has not been investigated within the realm of environmental review. We sought to quantify the extent to which citizen science data are currently being used, mentioned, or suggested in environmental impact statements (EISs) by analyzing more than 1300 EISs produced under the US National Environmental Policy Act. Among the sampled EISs, we found increasing incorporation of citizen science within the environmental review process, with 40% of EISs in 2022 using, mentioning, or suggesting use of such information, as compared with just 3% in 2012. Citizen science offers substantial potential to enhance biodiversity monitoring and conservation efforts within environmental review, but numerous considerations must be broadly discussed before citizen science data can be widely adopted.

environmental sciences,ecology
Identifying science in the news: An assessment of the precision and recall of Altmetric.com news mention data

Alice Fleerackers,Lise Nehring,Lauren A Maggio,Asura Enkhbayar,Laura Moorhead,Juan Pablo Alperin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04510-7

IF: 3.801

Scientometrics

Abstract:The company Altmetric is often used to collect mentions of research in online news stories, yet there have been concerns about the quality of this data. This study investigates these concerns. Using a manual content analysis of 400 news stories as a comparison method, we analyzed the precision and recall with which Altmetric identified mentions of research in 8 news outlets. We also used logistic regression to identify the characteristics of research mentions that influence their likelihood of being successfully identified. We find that, for a predefined set of outlets, Altmetric's news mention data were relatively accurate (F-score = 0.80), with very high precision (0.95) and acceptable recall (0.70), although recall is below 0.50 for some news outlets. Altmetric is more likely to successfully identify mentions of research that include a hyperlink to the research item, an author name, and/or the title of a publication venue. This data source appears to be less reliable for mentions of research that provide little or no bibliometric information, as well as for identifying mentions of scholarly monographs, conference presentations, dissertations, and non-English research articles. Our findings suggest that, with caveats, scholars can use Altmetric news mention data as a relatively reliable source to identify research mentions across a range of outlets with high precision and acceptable recall, offering scholars the potential to conserve resources during data collection. Our study does not, however, offer an assessment of completeness or accuracy of Altmetric news data overall. Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11192-022-04510-7.
Citizen Science: Contributions to Astronomy Research

Carol Christian,Chris Lintott,Arfon Smith,Lucy Fortson,Steven Bamford

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1202.2577

2012-02-13

Abstract:The contributions of everyday individuals to significant research has grown dramatically beyond the early days of classical birdwatching and endeavors of amateurs of the 19th century. Now people who are casually interested in science can participate directly in research covering diverse scientific fields. Regarding astronomy, volunteers, either as individuals or as networks of people, are involved in a variety of types of studies. Citizen Science is intuitive, engaging, yet necessarily robust in its adoption of sci-entific principles and methods. Herein, we discuss Citizen Science, focusing on fully participatory projects such as Zooniverse (by several of the au-thors CL, AS, LF, SB), with mention of other programs. In particular, we make the case that citizen science (CS) can be an important aspect of the scientific data analysis pipelines provided to scientists by observatories.

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics,Artificial Intelligence
Managing the Public to Manage Data: Citizen Science and Astronomy

Peter T. Darch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v9i1.298

2017-03-01

Abstract:Citizen science projects recruit members of the public as volunteers to process and produce datasets. These datasets must win the trust of the scientific community. The task of securing credibility involves, in part, applying standard scientific procedures to clean these datasets. However, effective management of volunteer behavior also makes a significant contribution to enhancing data quality. Through a case study of Galaxy Zoo, a citizen science project set up to generate datasets based on volunteer classifications of galaxy morphologies, this paper explores how those involved in running the project manage volunteers. The paper focuses on how methods for crediting volunteer contributions motivate volunteers to provide higher quality contributions and to behave in a way that better corresponds to statistical assumptions made when combining volunteer contributions into datasets. These methods have made a significant contribution to the success of the project in securing trust in these datasets, which have been well used by other scientists. Implications for practice are then presented for citizen science projects, providing a list of considerations to guide choices regarding how to credit volunteer contributions to improve the quality and trustworthiness of citizen science-produced datasets.

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics,Human-Computer Interaction
Beyond Data: Recognizing the Democratic Potential of Citizen Science

Magdalena Roszczyńska-Kurasińska,Anna Domaradzka,Michael O’Grady,Baptiste Bedessem,Niccolò Tempini,Mateusz Trochymiak,Nina Wróblewska

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/mts.2023.3344904

2024-02-03

IEEE Technology and Society Magazine

Abstract:Until Recently, The citizen science approach to knowledge production had been confined to scientific research, applied to a limited range of questions on which scientists and citizens could collaborate and trust each other. More recently, this approach has gained increasing attention from various quarters outside the traditional remit of professionalized science, which include local governments, civil society organizations (CSOs), professional networks, and cooperatives. These entities recognize citizen science as a practical method that harnesses the collective resources of a community to address pressing local concerns and promote a robust participatory democracy. Emerging initiatives include citizen observatories, data cooperatives, and collaboration platforms. Despite the growing popularity, managing citizen science initiatives (involving numerous participants over an extended period of time) poses considerable challenges. Leaders of citizen science initiatives grapple with difficulties that appear formidable to overcome. At present, the democratic potential of citizen science necessitates further development and scrutiny from social and political actors. Critics frequently underscore a disparity between the democratic ideals associated with citizen science and its current practical implementation. This article outlines the primary benefits and challenges associated with the democratization of citizen science. It builds from the empirical research of the ISEED project1 as well as the theoretical contribution of the Right to the Smart City project2 and formulates 10 key recommendations to citizen science project leaders.

engineering, electrical & electronic
Reputation Modelling in Citizen Science for Environmental Acoustic Data Analysis

HaoFan Yang,Jinglan Zhang,Paul Roe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-012-0087-3

2013-01-01

Social Network Analysis and Mining

Abstract:Citizen Science projects are initiatives in which members of the general public participate in scientific research projects and perform or manage research-related tasks such as data collection and/or data annotation. Citizen Science is technologically possible and scientifically significant. However, as the gathered information is from the crowd, the data reliability is always hard to manage. Data reliability issues are significant to the domain of Citizen Science due to the quantity and diversity of people and devices involved. Participants may submit low quality, misleading, inaccurate, or even malicious data. Therefore, finding a way to improve the data reliability has become an urgent demand. This study aims to investigate techniques to enhance the reliability of data contributed by general citizens in scientific research projects especially for acoustic sensing projects. In particular, we propose to design a reputation framework to enhance data reliability and also investigate some critical elements that should be aware of during developing and designing new reputation systems.
A Citizen Data-Based Approach to Predictive Mapping of Spatial Variation of Natural Phenomena

A-Xing Zhu,Guiming Zhang,Wei Wang,Wen Xiao,Zhi-Pang Huang,Ge-Sang Dunzhu,Guopeng Ren,Cheng-Zhi Qin,Lin Yang,Tao Pei,Shengtian Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2015.1058387

2015-01-01

International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Abstract:The vast accumulation of environmental data and the rapid development of geospatial visualization and analytical techniques make it possible for scientists to solicit information from local citizens to map spatial variation of geographic phenomena. However, data provided by citizens referred to as citizen data in this article suffer two limitations for mapping: bias in spatial coverage and imprecision in spatial location. This article presents an approach to minimizing the impacts of these two limitations of citizen data using geospatial analysis techniques. The approach reduces location imprecision by adopting a frequency-sampling strategy to identify representative presence locations from areas over which citizens observed the geographic phenomenon. The approach compensates for the spatial bias by weighting presence locations with cumulative visibility the frequency at which a given location can be seen by local citizens. As a case study to demonstrate the principle, this approach was applied to map the habitat suitability of the black-and-white snub-nosed monkey Rhinopithecus bieti in Yunnan, China. Sightings of R. bieti were elicited from local citizens using a geovisualization platform and then processed with the proposed approach to predict a habitat suitability map. Presence locations of R. bieti recorded by biologists through intensive field tracking were used to validate the predicted habitat suitability map. Validation showed that the continuous Boyce index Bcont0.1 calculated on the suitability map was 0.873 95% CI: [0.810, 0.917], indicating that the map was highly consistent with the field-observed distribution of R. bieti. Bcont0.1 was much lower 0.173 for the suitability map predicted based on citizen data when location imprecision was not reduced and even lower −0.048 when there was no compensation for spatial bias. This indicates that the proposed approach effectively minimized the impacts of location imprecision and spatial bias in citizen data and therefore effectively improved the quality of mapped spatial variation using citizen data. It further implies that, with the application of geospatial analysis techniques to properly account for limitations in citizen data, valuable information embedded in such data can be extracted and used for scientific mapping.
Citizen Science in the European Open Science Cloud

Stephen Serjeant

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/epn/2023204

2023-07-14

Abstract:The European Open Science Cloud aims to make all data Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable. By far the largest community of users of the European Open Science Cloud is the science-inclined public. These users need a more curated experience of open science than subject specialists, but nevertheless make very substantial research contributions in open science, especially in crowdsourced data mining, i.e. citizen science. This short, non-technical invited review presents applications of citizen science in the European Open Science Cloud, with a particular focus on astrophysics and astroparticle physics.

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics,Popular Physics
Evaluating the (in)accessibility of data behind papers in astronomy

Gretchen Stahlman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.04543

2022-09-10

Abstract:This paper presents results of a survey of authors of journal articles published over several decades in astronomy. The study focuses on determining the characteristics and accessibility of data behind papers, referring to the spectrum of raw and derived data that would be needed to validate the results of a particular published article as a capsule of scientific knowledge. Curating the data behind papers can arguably lead to new discoveries through reuse. However, as shown through related research and confirmed by the results of the present study, a fully accessible portrait of the data behind papers is often unavailable. These findings have implications for reusability efforts and are presented alongside a discussion of open science.

Digital Libraries
Citizen science, public policy

Christi J Guerrini,Mary A Majumder,Meaganne J Lewellyn,Amy L McGuire,Christi J. Guerrini,Mary A. Majumder,Meaganne J. Lewellyn,Amy L. McGuire

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar8379

IF: 56.9

2018-07-12

Science

Abstract:New research models may benefit from policy modifications

multidisciplinary sciences

The Accuracy of Citizen Science Data: A Quantitative Review

Assessing data quality in citizen science (preprint)

Quantifying online citizen science: Dynamics and demographics of public participation in science

Citizen Science As an Approach for Overcoming Insufficient Monitoring and Inadequate Stakeholder Buy-in in Adaptive Management: Criteria and Evidence

Citizen silence: Missed opportunities in citizen science

A Method for Conveying Confidence in iNaturalist Observations: A Case Study Using Non‐Native Marine Species

Citizen Science: An Information Quality Research Frontier

Integrating citizen science data with expert surveys increases accuracy and spatial extent of species distribution models

Citizen science: How to extend reciprocal benefits from the project community to the broader socio-ecological system

Assessing adequacy of citizen science datasets for biodiversity monitoring

Assessing citizen science data quality for bird monitoring in the Iberian Peninsula

Citizen science as a valuable tool for environmental review

Identifying science in the news: An assessment of the precision and recall of Altmetric.com news mention data

Citizen Science: Contributions to Astronomy Research

Managing the Public to Manage Data: Citizen Science and Astronomy

Beyond Data: Recognizing the Democratic Potential of Citizen Science

Reputation Modelling in Citizen Science for Environmental Acoustic Data Analysis

A Citizen Data-Based Approach to Predictive Mapping of Spatial Variation of Natural Phenomena

Citizen Science in the European Open Science Cloud

Evaluating the (in)accessibility of data behind papers in astronomy

Citizen science, public policy