Citizen science, public policy

Christi J Guerrini,Mary A Majumder,Meaganne J Lewellyn,Amy L McGuire,Christi J. Guerrini,Mary A. Majumder,Meaganne J. Lewellyn,Amy L. McGuire

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar8379

IF: 56.9

2018-07-12

Science

Abstract:New research models may benefit from policy modifications

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Citizen silence: Missed opportunities in citizen science

Damon M Hall,Pedro M Avellaneda-Lopez,Darren L Ficklin,Jason H Knouft,Christopher Lowry

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biae020

IF: 10.1

2024-03-27

BioScience

Abstract:Abstract Citizen science is personal. Participation is contingent on the citizens’ connection to a topic or to interpersonal relationships meaningful to them. But from the peer-reviewed literature, scientists appear to have an acquisitive data-centered relationship with citizens. This has spurred ethical and pragmatic criticisms of extractive relationships with citizen scientists. We suggest five practical steps to shift citizen-science research from extractive to relational, reorienting the research process and providing reciprocal benefits to researchers and citizen scientists. By virtue of their interests and experience within their local environments, citizen scientists have expertise that, if engaged, can improve research methods and product design decisions. To boost the value of scientific outputs to society and participants, citizen-science research teams should rethink how they engage and value volunteers.

biology
Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives

J Patrick Woolley,Michelle L McGowan,Harriet J A Teare,Victoria Coathup,Jennifer R Fishman,Richard A Settersten Jr,Sigrid Sterckx,Jane Kaye,Eric T Juengst

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0117-1

2016-06-04

Abstract:Background: The language of "participant-driven research," "crowdsourcing" and "citizen science" is increasingly being used to encourage the public to become involved in research ventures as both subjects and scientists. Originally, these labels were invoked by volunteer research efforts propelled by amateurs outside of traditional research institutions and aimed at appealing to those looking for more "democratic," "patient-centric," or "lay" alternatives to the professional science establishment. As mainstream translational biomedical research requires increasingly larger participant pools, however, corporate, academic and governmental research programs are embracing this populist rhetoric to encourage wider public participation. Discussion: We examine the ethical and social implications of this recruitment strategy. We begin by surveying examples of "citizen science" outside of biomedicine, as paradigmatic of the aspirations this democratizing rhetoric was originally meant to embody. Next, we discuss the ways these aspirations become articulated in the biomedical context, with a view to drawing out the multiple and potentially conflicting meanings of "public engagement" when citizens are also the subjects of the science. We then illustrate two uses of public engagement rhetoric to gain public support for national biomedical research efforts: its post-hoc use in the "care.data" project of the National Health Service in England, and its proactive uses in the "Precision Medicine Initiative" of the United States White House. These examples will serve as the basis for a normative analysis, discussing the potential ethical and social ramifications of this rhetoric. We pay particular attention to the implications of government strategies that cultivate the idea that members of the public have a civic duty to participate in government-sponsored research initiatives. We argue that such initiatives should draw from policy frameworks that support normative analysis of the role of citizenry. And, we conclude it is imperative to make visible and clear the full spectrum of meanings of "citizen science," the contexts in which it is used, and its demands with respect to participation, engagement, and governance.
Citizen science as a vehicle to address multiple policy objectives: Case studies from Australia

Leah Marks,Jo Mitchell,Samantha Rowbotham,Yvonne Laird,Ben J. Smith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.866

2024-05-21

Health Promotion Journal of Australia

Abstract:Issue Addressed Despite increasing interest in citizen science as an approach to engage members of the public in research and decision making about health and wellbeing, there is a lack of practical evidence to guide policy and practice organisations to utilise these approaches. In this study we investigated how and why citizen science came to be incorporated into the work of two policy organisations. Methods We offer two in‐depth case studies of Australian government organisations which have utilised citizen science in environmental and healthy ageing policy. Interviews with organisational informants and relevant documents were analysed inductively to explore how citizen science came to be adopted, legitimised and supported. Results Citizen science was utilised to address multiple organisational objectives, including increasing community participation in science; enhancing individuals' wellbeing, learning, and skills, and generating data to support research and policy in a relatively cost‐effective manner. In both cases, grant funding was a mechanism to support citizen science, with project delivery facilitated through academic‐policy partnerships and led by external academic or community partners. Conclusion Although citizen science is relatively new in policy and practice settings, this study underscores the value of these approaches in realising co‐benefits for organisations, academics, and community members. The support and advocacy of senior managers as 'champions', and a willingness to invest in trialling new approaches to address policy problems are necessary ingredients to foster acceptance and legitimacy of citizen science. So What? Citizen science initiatives can be strategically utilised by health promotion organisations to enact priorities related to genuine community involvement, support research and innovation and facilitate collaboration and partnerships between academic, policy and community stakeholders.

public, environmental & occupational health
Citizen Science, Education, and Learning: Challenges and Opportunities

Joseph Roche,Laura Bell,Cecília Galvão,Yaela N Golumbic,Laure Kloetzer,Nieke Knoben,Mari Laakso,Julia Lorke,Greg Mannion,Luciano Massetti,Alice Mauchline,Kai Pata,Andy Ruck,Pavel Taraba,Silvia Winter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.613814

2020-12-02

Abstract:Citizen science is a growing field of research and practice, generating new knowledge and understanding through the collaboration of citizens in scientific research. As the field expands, it is becoming increasingly important to consider its potential to foster education and learning opportunities. Although progress has been made to support learning in citizen science projects, as well as to facilitate citizen science in formal and informal learning environments, challenges still arise. This paper identifies a number of dilemmas facing the field-from competing scientific goals and learning outcomes, differing underlying ontologies and epistemologies, diverging communication strategies, to clashing values around advocacy and activism. Although such challenges can become barriers to the successful integration of citizen science into mainstream education systems, they also serve as signposts for possible synergies and opportunities. One of the key emerging recommendations is to align educational learning outcomes with citizen science project goals at the planning stage of the project using co-creation approaches to ensure issues of accessibility and inclusivity are paramount throughout the design and implementation of every project. Only then can citizen science realise its true potential to empower citizens to take ownership of their own science education and learning.
Beyond Data: Recognizing the Democratic Potential of Citizen Science

Magdalena Roszczyńska-Kurasińska,Anna Domaradzka,Michael O’Grady,Baptiste Bedessem,Niccolò Tempini,Mateusz Trochymiak,Nina Wróblewska

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/mts.2023.3344904

2024-02-03

IEEE Technology and Society Magazine

Abstract:Until Recently, The citizen science approach to knowledge production had been confined to scientific research, applied to a limited range of questions on which scientists and citizens could collaborate and trust each other. More recently, this approach has gained increasing attention from various quarters outside the traditional remit of professionalized science, which include local governments, civil society organizations (CSOs), professional networks, and cooperatives. These entities recognize citizen science as a practical method that harnesses the collective resources of a community to address pressing local concerns and promote a robust participatory democracy. Emerging initiatives include citizen observatories, data cooperatives, and collaboration platforms. Despite the growing popularity, managing citizen science initiatives (involving numerous participants over an extended period of time) poses considerable challenges. Leaders of citizen science initiatives grapple with difficulties that appear formidable to overcome. At present, the democratic potential of citizen science necessitates further development and scrutiny from social and political actors. Critics frequently underscore a disparity between the democratic ideals associated with citizen science and its current practical implementation. This article outlines the primary benefits and challenges associated with the democratization of citizen science. It builds from the empirical research of the ISEED project1 as well as the theoretical contribution of the Right to the Smart City project2 and formulates 10 key recommendations to citizen science project leaders.

engineering, electrical & electronic
The case for citizen science in public health policy and practice: a mixed methods study of policymaker and practitioner perspectives and experiences

Leah Marks,Ben J. Smith,Jo Mitchell,Yvonne Laird,Samantha Rowbotham

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-00978-8

2023-05-04

Health Research Policy and Systems

Abstract:Citizen science (CS) is increasingly being utilised to involve the public in public health research, but little is known about whether and how CS can address the needs of policy and practice stakeholders in health promotion and chronic disease prevention.

health policy & services
Exploring Citizen Science over Time: Sensing, Technology and the Law

Anna Berti Suman,Edwin Alblas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054496

IF: 3.9

2023-03-03

Sustainability

Abstract:People over the course of history have survived by developing their ability to 'sense' their environment as an embryonic form of citizen science. With the emergence of modern states, governments have assumed responsibility for monitoring the quality of the environment, and progressively the practice and role of citizen science has changed. This review explores the different manifestations of citizen science over time, with a focus on its law and governance dimensions, reading this evolution as a critical analysis of the current discourses around citizen science. The evolution of citizen science throughout history and its transformation shows certain patterns that are highlighted in this article as 'constant' features, whereas other features are instead interrupted and reversed, and new ones emerge. We thus examined citizen science over time by asking what is really new about this phenomenon, focusing on constants—permanent features—and turning points—changes in direction. We argue that these dynamics are central to understanding the promises and perils of the practice, to fully grasping the forms of uninvited, reactive environmental citizen science and to scoping foreseeable future scenarios.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
More Than Just Networking for Citizen Science

Claudia Göbel,Jessica L. Cappadonna,Gregory J. Newman,Jian Zhang,Katrin Vohland

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8362-2.ch030

2017-01-01

Abstract:Citizen science activity is growing rapidly around the world and diversifies into new disciplines with recent advances in technology. This expansion is accompanied by the formation of associations and networks dedicated to citizen science practitioners, which aim at supporting citizen science as a research approach. This chapter examines how four such organizations in the United States, Europe, Australia, and China have begun to take shape, and are working with citizen science communities and stakeholders in respective regions and globally. Challenges and future plans of these groups are also discussed. This chapter identifies three core roles of citizen science practitioner organization: 1) establishing communities of practitioners, 2) building expertise through sharing of existing and developing new knowledge, and 3) representing community interests. By focusing on this hitherto neglected phenomenon, the authors aim to stimulate further research, discussion and critical reflection on these central agents in the emerging citizen science landscape.
Harnessing citizen science in health promotion: perspectives of policy and practice stakeholders in Australia

Yvonne Laird,Leah Marks,Ben J Smith,Pippy Walker,Kate Garvey,Kim Jose,Sean O’Rourke,Katherine Pontifex,Karen Wardle,Samantha Rowbotham

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daad101

2023-09-14

Health Promotion International

Abstract:Abstract Citizen science is rapidly gaining momentum as a means of involving members of the public in research and decision-making in disease prevention and health promotion. However, citizen science projects have predominantly been led by academic researchers and there is limited understanding of how to support the application of citizen science approaches in policy and practice settings. This study aimed to understand the perceptions, motivations and early experiences of applying citizen science approaches in policy and practice settings. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with policy and practice stakeholders who were leading citizen science projects (project partners, n = 7), and their implementation partners (project implementers, n = 11). Participants viewed citizen science as an opportunity to access hard-to-reach data and to enhance engagement with community members to support policy and practice change. Barriers and facilitators of citizen science in policy and practice settings included navigating collaborative relationships, team capacity and resources available to deliver projects, recruitment and engagement of citizen scientists and ethical considerations in the design and implementation of citizen science projects. Findings support the feasibility and wider application of citizen science approaches in health promotion and are being used to inform the development of tools and resources to build capacity in these approaches in policy and practice settings.

public, environmental & occupational health,health policy & services
Citizen science: How to extend reciprocal benefits from the project community to the broader socio-ecological system

Aurore Receveur,Lucie Poulet,Benjamin Dalmas,Barbara Gonçalves,Antoine Vernay

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/qpb.2022.16

2022-10-05

Quantitative Plant Biology

Abstract:Quantitative plant biology is a growing field, thanks to the substantial progress of models and artificial intelligence dealing with big data. However, collecting large enough datasets is not always straightforward. The citizen science approach can multiply the workforce, hence helping the researchers with data collection and analysis, while also facilitating the spread of scientific knowledge and methods to volunteers. The reciprocal benefits go far beyond the project community: By empowering volunteers and increasing the robustness of scientific results, the scientific method spreads to the socio-ecological scale. This review aims to demonstrate that citizen science has a huge potential (i) for science with the development of different tools to collect and analyse much larger datasets, (ii) for volunteers by increasing their involvement in the project governance and (iii) for the socio-ecological system by increasing the share of the knowledge, thanks to a cascade effect and the help of 'facilitators'.

English Else
Coercion, Consent, and Participation in Citizen Science

Alison Reiheld,Pamela L. Gay

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.13061

2019-07-29

Abstract:Throughout history, everyday people have contributed to science through a myriad of volunteer activities. This early participation required training and often involved mentorship from scientists or senior citizen scientists (or, as they were often called, gentleman scientists). During this learning process, participants learned how they and their data would be used both to advance science, and in some cases, advance the careers of professional collaborators. Modern, online citizen science, allows participation with just a few clicks, and people may participate without understanding what they are contributing to. Too often, they happily see what they are doing as the privilege of painting Tom Sawyer's fence without realizing they are actually being used as merely a means to a scientific end. This paper discusses the ethical dilemmas that plague modern citizen science, including: the issues of informed consent, such as not requiring logins; the issues of coercion inherent in mandatory classroom assignments requiring data submission; and the issues of using people merely as a means to an end that are inherent in technonationalism, and projects that do not provide utility to the users beyond the knowledge they helped. This work is tested within the context of astronomy citizen science.

Computers and Society,Physics Education
Quantifying online citizen science: Dynamics and demographics of public participation in science

Bruno J Strasser,Elise Tancoigne,Jérôme Baudry,Steven Piguet,Helen Spiers,José Luis-Fernandez Marquez,Jérôme Kasparian,François Grey,David Anderson,Chris Lintott

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293289

IF: 3.7

2023-11-21

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Citizen scientists around the world are collecting data with their smartphones, performing scientific calculations on their home computers, and analyzing images on online platforms. These online citizen science projects are frequently lauded for their potential to revolutionize the scope and scale of data collection and analysis, improve scientific literacy, and democratize science. Yet, despite the attention online citizen science has attracted, it remains unclear how widespread public participation is, how it has changed over time, and how it is geographically distributed. Importantly, the demographic profile of citizen science participants remains uncertain, and thus to what extent their contributions are helping to democratize science. Here, we present the largest quantitative study of participation in citizen science based on online accounts of more than 14 million participants over two decades. We find that the trend of broad rapid growth in online citizen science participation observed in the early 2000s has since diverged by mode of participation, with consistent growth observed in nature sensing, but a decline seen in crowdsourcing and distributed computing. Most citizen science projects, except for nature sensing, are heavily dominated by men, and the vast majority of participants, male and female, have a background in science. The analysis we present here provides, for the first time, a robust 'baseline' to describe global trends in online citizen science participation. These results highlight current challenges and the future potential of citizen science. Beyond presenting our analysis of the collated data, our work identifies multiple metrics for robust examination of public participation in science and, more generally, online crowds. It also points to the limits of quantitative studies in capturing the personal, societal, and historical significance of citizen science.
Citizen Science: An Information Quality Research Frontier

Roman Lukyanenko,Andrea Wiggins,Holly K. Rosser

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.08289

2019-05-20

Computers and Society

Abstract:The rapid proliferation of online content producing and sharing technologies resulted in an explosion of user-generated content (UGC), which now extends to scientific data. Citizen science, in which ordinary people contribute information for scientific research, epitomizes UGC. Citizen science projects are typically open to everyone, engage diverse audiences, and challenge ordinary people to produce data of highest quality to be usable in science. This also makes citizen science a very exciting area to study both traditional and innovative approaches to information quality management. With this paper we position citizen science as a leading information quality research frontier. We also show how citizen science opens a unique opportunity for the information systems community to contribute to a broad range of disciplines in natural and social sciences and humanities.
Citizen science in the social sciences and humanities: the power of interdisciplinarity

Loreta Tauginienė,Eglė Butkevičienė,Katrin Vohland,Barbara Heinisch,Maria Daskolia,Monika Suškevičs,Manuel Portela,Bálint Balázs,Baiba Prūse

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0471-y

2020-05-07

Palgrave Communications

Abstract:Abstract Citizen science evolved through multiple disciplinary manifestations into a new field of study and a participatory method of enquiry. While most citizen science projects take place within problem-focused natural sciences, social sciences and humanities help understanding the human dimension and open a broad methodological spectrum for enriching scientific research with new approaches and for boosting public participation. In this paper, we use a meta-synthesis approach to explore how citizen science is practised in the so far less addressed social sciences and humanities by focusing on the role of the citizens, the goals and approaches of the projects, the tasks in which citizens are engaged and their gains across projects of diverse disciplinary background. Our findings indicate that social sciences are gaining more acknowledgment within interdisciplinary citizen science projects by addressing ‘wicked’ problems of human behaviour and agency, while humanities are in quest of a better-defined locus in citizen science. We conclude that social sciences and humanities still face considerable barriers to infiltrate citizen science; the payoffs are substantial and already rewarding for several subfields in social sciences and humanities.
A best–worst scaling experiment to prioritize concern about ethical issues in citizen science reveals heterogeneity on people-level v. data-level issues

Christi J. Guerrini,Norah L. Crossnohere,Lisa Rasmussen,John F. P. Bridges

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96743-4

IF: 4.6

2021-09-27

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Abstract “Citizen science” refers to the participation of lay individuals in scientific studies and other activities having scientific objectives. Citizen science gives rise to unique ethical issues that stem from the potentially multifaceted contributions of citizen scientists to the research process. We sought to explore the ethical issues that are most concerning to citizen scientist practitioners, participants, and scholars to support ethical practices in citizen science. We developed a best–worst scaling experiment using a balanced incomplete block design and fielded it with respondents recruited through the U.S.-based Citizen Science Association. Respondents were shown repeated subsets of 11 ethical issues and identified the most and least concerning issues in each subset. Latent class analysis revealed two respondent classes. The “Power to the People” class was most concerned about power imbalance between project leaders and participants, exploitation of participants, and lack of diverse participation. The “Show Me the Data” class was most concerned about the quality of data generated by citizen science projects and failure of projects to share data and other research outputs.

multidisciplinary sciences
Citizen Science and Natural Resource Management: A Social Network Analysis of Two Community-Based Water Monitoring Programs

Patrick R. Bonney,Birgita D. Hansen,Claudia Baldwin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2183445

2023-03-31

Abstract:In natural resource management contexts, citizen science programs often involve a diversity of actors collaborating in broad social networks. However, the characteristics and functioning of these networks has received limited attention. In this article, we demonstrate the benefits of applying social network research to citizen science practice. Through a mixed methods approach, we compare data sharing and collaboration networks of two community-based water monitoring programs in Australia. The quantitative component revealed that despite similarities in actor diversity and activities, both programs have created divergent network structures (centralized vs decentralized) corresponding to their scale of influence in environmental decision-making (regional vs local impacts). The qualitative component showed how individuals navigated their relationships and managed key tensions inherent to network functioning. This study provides new insights on the role of social networks in citizen science and concludes by recommending program leaders adopt a "networking mindset" to maximize their sphere of influence.

sociology,environmental studies,development studies,regional & urban planning
Scientists@Home: What Drives the Quantity and Quality of Online Citizen Science Participation?

Oded Nov,Ofer Arazy,David Anderson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090375

IF: 3.7

2014-04-01

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Online citizen science offers a low-cost way to strengthen the infrastructure for scientific research and engage members of the public in science. As the sustainability of online citizen science projects depends on volunteers who contribute their skills, time, and energy, the objective of this study is to investigate effects of motivational factors on the quantity and quality of citizen scientists' contribution. Building on the social movement participation model, findings from a longitudinal empirical study in three different citizen science projects reveal that quantity of contribution is determined by collective motives, norm-oriented motives, reputation, and intrinsic motives. Contribution quality, on the other hand, is positively affected only by collective motives and reputation. We discuss implications for research on the motivation for participation in technology-mediated social participation and for the practice of citizen science.

multidisciplinary sciences
CSCW Principles to Support Citizen Science

Julia Katherine Haines

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1503.00174

2015-02-28

Computers and Society

Abstract:Citizen science changes the way scientific research is pursued. It opens up data collection and analysis to the general public, to the wisdom of crowds. In this emerging area, there is much research to be done to better understand how we can develop citizen science infrastructure and continue the democratization of science. In creating such systems, there is much we can learn from principles that have emerged out of computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW) research. In this paper, I use a nine-step framework to highlight where CSCW knowledge can contribute.
More Than Just Networking For Citizen Science: Examining Core Roles Of Practitioner Organizations

Claudia Goebel,Gregory J. Newman,Jessica L. Cappadonna,Jian Zhang,Katrin Vohland

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0962-2.ch002

2017-01-01

Abstract:Citizen science activity is growing rapidly around the world and diversifies into new disciplines with recent advances in technology. This expansion is accompanied by the formation of associations and networks dedicated to citizen science practitioners, which aim at supporting citizen science as a research approach. This chapter examines how four such organizations in the United States, Europe, Australia, and China have begun to take shape, and are working with citizen science communities and stakeholders in respective regions and globally. Challenges and future plans of these groups are also discussed. This chapter identifies three core roles of citizen science practitioner organization: 1) establishing communities of practitioners, 2) building expertise through sharing of existing and developing new knowledge, and 3) representing community interests. By focusing on this hitherto neglected phenomenon, the authors aim to stimulate further research, discussion and critical reflection on these central agents in the emerging citizen science landscape.
Citizen Science As an Approach for Overcoming Insufficient Monitoring and Inadequate Stakeholder Buy-in in Adaptive Management: Criteria and Evidence

Eréndira Aceves-Bueno,Adeyemi S. Adeleye,Darcy Bradley,W. Tyler Brandt,Patrick Callery,Marina Feraud,Kendra L. Garner,Rebecca Gentry,Yuxiong Huang,Ian McCullough,Isaac Pearlman,Sara A. Sutherland,Whitney Wilkinson,Yi Yang,Trevor Zink,Sarah E. Anderson,Christina Tague

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-015-9842-4

2015-01-01

Ecosystems

Abstract:Adaptive management is broadly recognized as critical for managing natural resources, yet in practice it often fails to achieve intended results for two main reasons: insufficient monitoring and inadequate stakeholder buy-in. Citizen science is gaining momentum as an approach that can inform natural resource management and has some promise for solving the problems faced by adaptive management. Based on adaptive management literature, we developed a set of criteria for successfully addressing monitoring and stakeholder related failures in adaptive management and then used these criteria to evaluate 83 citizen science case studies from peer-reviewed literature. The results suggest that citizen science can be a cost-effective method to collect essential monitoring information and can also produce the high levels of citizen engagement that are vital to the adaptive management learning process. The analysis also provides a set of recommendations for citizen science program design that addresses spatial and temporal scale, data quality, costs, and effective incentives to facilitate participation and integration of findings into adaptive management.

Citizen science, public policy

Citizen silence: Missed opportunities in citizen science

Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives

Citizen science as a vehicle to address multiple policy objectives: Case studies from Australia

Citizen Science, Education, and Learning: Challenges and Opportunities

Beyond Data: Recognizing the Democratic Potential of Citizen Science

The case for citizen science in public health policy and practice: a mixed methods study of policymaker and practitioner perspectives and experiences

Exploring Citizen Science over Time: Sensing, Technology and the Law

More Than Just Networking for Citizen Science

Harnessing citizen science in health promotion: perspectives of policy and practice stakeholders in Australia

Citizen science: How to extend reciprocal benefits from the project community to the broader socio-ecological system

Coercion, Consent, and Participation in Citizen Science

Quantifying online citizen science: Dynamics and demographics of public participation in science

Citizen Science: An Information Quality Research Frontier

Citizen science in the social sciences and humanities: the power of interdisciplinarity

A best–worst scaling experiment to prioritize concern about ethical issues in citizen science reveals heterogeneity on people-level v. data-level issues

Citizen Science and Natural Resource Management: A Social Network Analysis of Two Community-Based Water Monitoring Programs

Scientists@Home: What Drives the Quantity and Quality of Online Citizen Science Participation?

CSCW Principles to Support Citizen Science

More Than Just Networking For Citizen Science: Examining Core Roles Of Practitioner Organizations

Citizen Science As an Approach for Overcoming Insufficient Monitoring and Inadequate Stakeholder Buy-in in Adaptive Management: Criteria and Evidence