Abstract:Among four membrane distillation (MD) configurations, direct contact MD (DCMD) and vacuum MD (VMD) exhibit attractive characteristics from different perspectives and have great potential in treating reverse osmosis (RO) brine. Aiming at establishing a quick approach to predict the key output parameters associated with MD module performance and process efficiency, Aspen plus was employed to conduct systematic evaluation for both DCMD and VMD. Due to the lack of built-in MD operation models in Aspen Plus, one dimensional transport models were developed and complied as user customized units to simulate the hollow fiber-based DCMD and VMD modules. The corresponding programming was coded in FORTRAN language. The mathematical models for DCMD and VMD were verified by comparing the simulations results with the experimental and literature data, respectively.By incorporating the boundary-layer effect into the newly-established transport models, steady-state simulations of the respective DCMD and VMD flowsheets were carried out. The results showed that the DCMD presented much lower process efficiency than VMD in terms of permeation flux and specific energy consumption per kg distillate generated, even though it is considered as the simplest and most commonly employed configuration. With the same module specifications and operating conditions at equivalent energy cost, the VMD system demonstrated a minimal 2.5-fold higher average vapor flux (e.g., water recovery capacity) when compared to DCMD. The fundamental difference between the two configurations was revealed through MD mass- and heat-transfer analysis. Based on simulated temperature profiles, it was found that the VMD configuration presented a much higher driving force (transmembrane temperature difference) and negligible conductive heat loss to the membrane, which is a promising feature for achieving high thermal efficiency.

Simulation of heat and mass transfer with cross-flow hollow fiber vacuum membrane distillation: The influence of fiber arrangement

Mass Transfer Enhancement in Non‐dispersive Solvent Extraction with Helical Hollow Fiber Enabling Dean Vortices

Numerical Simulation of 3D Hollow-Fiber Vacuum Membrane Distillation by Computational Fluid Dynamics

Numerical Simulation of Cross-Flow Vacuum Membrane Distillation and Characteristics Analysis

Mass transfer in hollow fiber vacuum membrane distillation process based on membrane structure

Effect of Fiber Packing Density on Performance and Mass Transfer of Hollow Fiber Membrane Contactor

Analysis on the structure of different hollow fiber membrane contactors

CFD simulations of fiber-fiber interaction in a hollow fiber membrane bundle: Fiber distance and position matters

Spatial variations of DCMD performance for desalination through countercurrent hollow fiber modules

3D-CFD simulation of hollow fiber direct contact membrane distillation module: Effect of module and fibers geometries on hydrodynamics, mass, and heat transfer

CFD Study on the Performance of Hollow Fiber Ultrafiltration Membrane Modules with Different Fiber Arrangement

Numerical Simulation of Novel Polypropylene Hollow Fiber Heat Exchanger and Analysis of Its Characteristics

CFD numerical simulation of the flow field of module in the new frame and air gap membrane distillation

Simulation of Heat and Mass Transfer in Solution Heat Exchanger with Hollow Fiber Membrane

Computational fluid dynamics based numerical simulations of heat transfer, fluid flow and mass transfer in vacuum membrane distillation process

Simulation and calculation of membrane parameters in vacuum membrane distillation

CFD modeling of flow in hollow fiber pervaporation membrane

Turbulent heat and mass transfer across a hollow fiber membrane bundle considering interactions between neighboring fibers

Simulation of the Transport Phenomenon Occurring in Membrane Pores During Vacuum Membrane Distillation

An experimental and modeling investigation of the behaviors of solution in fluoropolymers hollow fiber membranes (HFMs)

Evaluation of Hollow Fiber-Based Direct Contact and Vacuum Membrane Distillation Systems Using Aspen Process Simulation