P1.45: Impact of Dose Adjustment on Afatinib Safety and Efficacy in EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC: Post-Hoc Analyses of LUX-Lung 3/6: Track: Advanced NSCLC

Carlos H. Barrios,Yi-Long Wu,James Chih-Hsin Yang,Lecia V. Sequist,Sarayut L. Geater,Tony Mok,Cheng-Ping Hu,Nobuyuki Yamamoto,Kenneth O’Byrne,Shun Lu,Vera Hirsh,Martin Sebastian,Isamu Okamoto,Riyaz Shah,Angela Märten,Dan Massey,Sven Wind,Martin Schuler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2016.08.067
IF: 20.121
2016-01-01
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Abstract:Afatinib 40 mg/day is approved for first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An established dose-adjustment protocol exists for afatinib, which can be implemented based on individual tolerability. Here we report the results of post-hoc analyses assessing the impact of afatinib dose adjustment on adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetics (PK) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the LUX-Lung 3 (LL3) and LUX-Lung 6 (LL6) trials. All afatinib-treated patients from LL3 (n=229) and LL6 (n=239) were included in the analyses. In the case of drug-related grade 3 or selected prolonged grade 2 AEs at the standard afatinib monotherapy dose of 40 mg/day, the dose could be reduced by 10 mg decrements to a minimum of 20 mg/day. The incidence and severity of common AEs before and after dose reduction were analyzed, and PK data collected during the standard visit schedules on Days 22 and 43 was compared in patients who reduced to 30 mg versus those remaining at 40 mg/day. PFS in patients who dose reduced within the first 6 months of treatment was compared with those who remained on 40 mg/day. Dose reductions occurred in 53% (122/229) of patients in LL3 and 28% (67/239) of patients in LL6. The majority (LL3: 86%; LL6: 82%) of dose reductions occurred within the first 6 months of treatment. Dose reduction led to decreases in incidence and severity of EGFR-mediated drug-related AEs across LL3 and LL6 (Table). A combined PK analysis of LL3 and LL6 suggested that dose reduction was more likely in patients with higher afatinib plasma concentrations. Patients who dose reduced to 30 mg had geometric mean plasma afatinib concentrations of 45.6 ng/mL on Day 22 (n=22) and 23.3 ng/mL on Day 43 (n=59), compared with those who remained on 40 mg with concentrations of 24.3 ng/mL on Day 22 (n=282) and 22.8 ng/mL on Day 43 (n=284). Across LL3 and LL6, median PFS was similar in patients who dose reduced during the first 6 months of treatment versus those who remained on 40 mg/day (LL3: 11.3 vs 11.0 months, HR=1.25 [95% CI: 0.91–1.72]; LL6: 12.3 vs 11.0 months, HR=1.00 [95% CI: 0.69–1.46]).Table 1Most common drug-related AEs pre- and post-afatinib dose reductionAE, %LL3LL6Overall population (n=229)Pre-dose reduction (n=122)Post-dose reduction (n=122)Overall population (n=239)Pre-dose reduction (n=67)Post-dose reduction (n=67)AllGrade ≥3AllGrade ≥3AllGrade ≥3AllGrade ≥3AllGrade ≥3AllGrade ≥3Diarrhea95.214.499.220.546.74.188.35.488.111.929.90Rash/acne89.116.288.526.238.53.380.814.682.138.829.94.5Stomatitis72.18.777.012.327.9051.95.455.213.417.91.5Nail effect61.111.844.316.436.94.933.9019.4013.40 Open table in a new tab In LL3 and LL6, afatinib demonstrated a trend towards improved overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy in the overall study populations and significant OS improvements in patients with EGFR Del19-positive disease. Results from this post-hoc analysis indicate that tolerability-guided dose adjustment of afatinib reduces treatment-related AEs without adversely affecting efficacy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?