Abstract:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive (M+) non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an important subtype of lung cancer comprising 10% to 15% of non‐squamous tumours. This subtype is more common in women than men, is less associated with smoking, but occurs at a younger age than sporadic tumours. To assess the clinical effectiveness of single‐agent or combination EGFR therapies used in the first‐line treatment of people with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR M+ NSCLC compared with other cytotoxic chemotherapy (CTX) agents used alone or in combination, or best supportive care (BSC). The primary outcomes were overall survival and progression‐free survival. Secondary outcomes included response rate, symptom palliation, toxicity, and health‐related quality of life. We conducted electronic searches of the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2020, Issue 7), MEDLINE (1946 to 27th July 2020), Embase (1980 to 27th July 2020), and ISI Web of Science (1899 to 27th July 2020). We also searched the conference abstracts of the American Society for Clinical Oncology and the European Society for Medical Oncology (July 2020); Evidence Review Group submissions to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; and the reference lists of retrieved articles. Parallel‐group randomised controlled trials comparing EGFR‐targeted agents (alone or in combination with cytotoxic agents or BSC) with cytotoxic chemotherapy (single or doublet) or BSC in chemotherapy‐naive patients with locally advanced or metastatic (stage IIIB or IV) EGFR M+ NSCLC unsuitable for treatment with curative intent. Two review authors independently identified articles, extracted data, and carried out the 'Risk of bias' assessment. We conducted meta‐analyses using a fixed‐effect model unless there was substantial heterogeneity, in which case we also performed a random‐effects analysis as a sensitivity analysis. Twenty‐two trials met the inclusion criteria. Ten of these exclusively recruited people with EGFR M+ NSCLC; the remainder recruited a mixed population and reported results for people with EGFR M+ NSCLC as subgroup analyses. The number of participants with EGFR M+ tumours totalled 3023, of whom approximately 2563 were of Asian origin. Overall survival (OS) data showed inconsistent results between the included trials that compared EGFR‐targeted treatments against cytotoxic chemotherapy or placebo. Erlotinib was used in eight trials, gefitinib in nine trials, afatinib in two trials, cetuximab in two trials, and icotinib in one trial. The findings of FASTACT 2 suggested a clinical benefit for OS for participants treated with erlotinib plus cytotoxic chemotherapy when compared to cytotoxic chemotherapy alone, as did the Han 2017 trial for gefitinib plus cytotoxic chemotherapy, but both results were based on a small number of participants (n = 97 and 122, respectively). For progression‐free survival (PFS), a pooled analysis of four trials showed evidence of clinical benefit for erlotinib compared with cytotoxic chemotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.31; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 0.39 ; 583 participants ; high‐certainty evidence). A pooled analysis of two trials of gefitinib versus paclitaxel plus carboplatin showed evidence of clinical benefit for PFS for gefitinib (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.48 ; 491 participants high‐certainty evidence), and a pooled analysis of two trials of gefitinib versus pemetrexed plus carboplatin with pemetrexed maintenance also showed evidence of clinical benefit for PFS for gefitinib (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.74, 371 participants ; moderate‐certainty evidence). Afatinib showed evidence of clinical benefit for PFS when compared with chemotherapy in a pooled analysis of two trials (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.53, 709 participants high‐certainty evidence). All but one small trial showed a corresponding improvement in response rate with tyrosine‐kinase inhibitor (TKI) compared to chemotherapy. Commonly reported grade 3/4 adverse events associated with afatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib and icotinib monotherapy were rash and diarrhoea. Myelosuppression was consistently worse in the chemotherapy arms; fatigue and anorexia were also associated with some chemotherapies. Seven trials reported on health‐related quality of life and symptom improvement using different methodologies. For each of erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib, two trials showed improvement in one or more indices for the TKI compared to chemotherapy. The quality of evidence was high for the comparisons of erlotinib and gefitinib with cytotoxic chemotherapy and for the comparison of afatinib with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib and icotinib are all active agents in EGFR M+ NSCLC patients, and demonstrate an increased tumour response rate and prolonged PFS compared to cytotoxic chemotherapy. We found a beneficial effect of the TKI compared to cytotoxic c -Abstract Truncated-

First-line Afatinib (A) Vs Gefitinib (G) for Patients (pts) with EGFR Mutation Positive (egfrm+) NSCLC (Lux-Lung 7): Patient-reported Outcomes (pros) and Impact of Dose Modifications on Efficacy and Adverse Events (Aes).

P1.14-62 Afatinib in EGFR TKI-Naïve Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC: Combined Analysis of Two Single-Arm Phase IIIb Studies

P1.01-98 A Phase IIIb Trial of Afatinib in EGFRm+ NSCLC: Analyses of Outcomes in Patients with Brain Metastases or Dose Reductions

P3.01-036 A Phase IIIb Open-Label, Single-Arm Study of Afatinib in EGFR TKI-Naïve Patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC: An Interim Analysis

Afatinib versus gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: overall survival data from the phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial

Randomized phase III trial of aumolertinib (HS-10296, Au) versus gefitinib (G) as first-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and EGFR exon 19 del or L858R mutations (EGFRm).

Efficacy and Safety of Befotertinib (D-0316) in Patients with EGFR T790M-Mutated NSCLC That Had Progressed after Prior EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study.

Safety, Clinical Activity, and Pharmacokinetics of Alflutinib (AST2818) in Patients with Advanced NSCLC with EGFR T790M Mutation.

A Modified Phase 1 Clinical Trial of Abivertinib (ac0010), a Third-Generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Chinese Patients with EGFR-T790M-positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

MA16.06 Phase I/II Study of AC0010, Mutant-Selective EGFR Inhibitor, in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients with EGFR T790M Mutation

Safety and Efficacy of Abivertinib (AC0010), a Third-Generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Chinese Patients with EGFR-T790M Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NCSLC).

1370Tip Befotertinib Versus Icotinib As First-Line Treatment in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic EGFR-mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Phase III Study

First-line treatment of advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Fruquintinib with Gefitinib As First-Line Therapy in Patients Carrying EGFR Mutations with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Single-Arm, Phase II Study

Afatinib Vs Erlotinib for Second-Line Treatment of Chinese Patients with Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung.

AENEAS: A Randomized Phase III Trial of Aumolertinib Versus Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy for Locally Advanced or MetastaticNon–Small-Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Exon 19 Deletion or L858R Mutations

EP1.14-19 Efficacy and Safety of Afatinib for Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients with Sensitive EGFR Mutations in Chinese Population

Third-line Treatment: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III ALTER-0303 Study—efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib Treatment in Patients with Refractory Advanced NSCLC.

Afatinib in EGFR TKI-Naïve Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Three Phase IIIb Studies

P2.01-99 A Phase IIIb Open-Label Study of Afatinib in EGFR TKI-Naïve Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC: Final Analysis

Efficacy and Safety of Aumolertinib Combined with or Without Chemotherapy As an Adjuvant Treatment for Stage II-IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Complete Tumour Resection: the First Third-Generation EGFR-TKI Versus Chemotherapy Phase III Clinical Study (APEX).