Abstract:The "working" function of visual working memory (VWM) has been highlighted by recent studies. Findings demonstrated that the sequentially presented visual elements would be involuntarily integrated into visual objects or figures inside VWM, providing evidence that VWM functions as a buffer serving perceptual processes by storing the intermediate perceptual representations for further processing. In those studies, the number of visual elements was usually controlled within the capacity of VWM; however, the realistic environment we live in is so rich and complex that the visual system has to constantly deal with massive visual information. How is such enormous amount of information actually processed with limited VWM capacity? Notwithstanding researchers know that the visual system can extract statistical properties of crowds of objects to form ensemble representations, it is largely unclear whether and how ensemble representations integrate inside VWM. This issue was investigated in the present study. Participants viewed two temporally separated groups of discs, after a short time, they reported the memorized mean size of either one of the groups or the whole (i.e., all the discs in the two groups) by adjusting a probe disc. The results indicated that participants were able to report accurate mean size of each group and the whole set of discs, respectively. More importantly, the reported mean size of the whole could be predicted by the pooled mean calculated based on the reported means of two individual groups. This result suggested that the temporally separated ensemble representations stored in VWM are able to be integrated into a higher-level ensemble representation, using the perceived statistics of the crowds of objects. Thus, when the amount of objects exceeds the capacity of VWM, the visual system will chose to store the necessary statistics for describing the ensemble and supporting further statistical computation. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017

Two Equals One: Social Interaction Groups Two Biological Movements As One Unit

Two Equals One: Two Human Actions During Social Interaction Are Grouped As One Unit in Working Memory.

Integrating Shared Representationsin Social Situation

Biological Movement is Stored Independently from Body Posture in Working Memory

The Automatic Processing of Social Information in Working Memory.

Agent identity drives adaptive encoding of biological motion into working memory.

Holding Biological Motion Information in Working Memory.

The combination operation of grouping and ensemble coding for structured biological motion crowds in working memory

Rehearsing Biological Motion in Working Memory: an EEG Study.

Asymmetric Interaction Effects of Information with Varying Priorities in Visual Working Memory

Holding Biological Motion in Working Memory: an Fmri Study

Event-based Encoding of Biological Motion and Location in Visual Working Memory.

Relation Between Working Memory Capacity of Biological Movements and Fluid Intelligence

Motion-based Attention Underlies the Rehearsal of Biological Motion in Working Memory

Binding biological motion and visual features in working memory.

Integration of Ensemble Representations Stored in Visual Working Memory

Biological Motion is Stored Independently from Bound Representation in Working Memory

Visual Working Memory Organizes Functional Related Objects Beyond the Spatiotemporal Limit

Selective attention operates on the group level for interactive biological motion.

Working Memory Capacity of Biological Motion’s Basic Unit: Decomposing Biological Motion From the Perspective of Systematic Anatomy

The storage mechanism of dynamic relations in visual working memory