Abstract:PURPOSE: Over the past decade, it has been debated whether retaining bindings in working memory (WM) requires more attention than retaining constituent features, focusing on domain-general attention and space-based attention. Recently we proposed that retaining bindings in WM needs more object-based attention than retaining constituent features (Gao et al., 2017; Shen, Huang, & Gao, 2015). However, the composed features in the tested bindings all belong to separable feature dimensions. It has been suggested that there are two types of feature relations: Separable features (e.g., color and shape in a colored shape) and integral features (e.g., width and height of a rectangle). While our brain encodes separable features independently, it is difficult to encode the integral features separately. Consequently, the object-based attention hypothesis of retaining bindings in WM may be constrained to separable features, and retaining bindings of integral features does not require more object-based attention than the constitute single features. METHODS: In the current study we addressed this issue by requiring the participants to memorize both width and height of three rectangles or the binding between the two feature dimensions. In the critical condition, we added a secondary transparent motion task during the delay interval of the change-detection task, such that the secondary task competed for object-based attention with the to-be-memorized stimuli. If more object-based attention is required for retaining bindings than for retaining constituent features, the secondary task should impair the binding performance to a larger degree relative to the performance of constituent features. RESULTS: In contrast to the prediction of object-based attention hypothesis, the added secondary task equally impaired the performance of single features and binding. CONCLUSION: Retaining bindings of integral features in WM does not require more object-based attention than the constitute single features, providing a key constraint to the object-based attention hypothesis.

Binding biological motion and visual features in working memory.

Holding Biological Motion Information in Working Memory.

Bindings in Working Memory: the Role of Object-Based Attention

Biological Motion is Stored Independently from Bound Representation in Working Memory

Motion-based Attention Underlies the Rehearsal of Biological Motion in Working Memory

Object-based attention in retaining binding in working memory: Influence of activation states of working memory

Holding Biological Motion in Working Memory: an Fmri Study

Retaining Bindings of Integral Features in Working Memory: the Role of Object-based Attention

Feature Binding in Working Memory Requires Object-based Attention.

The Role of Attention in Retaining the Binding of Integral Features in Working Memory.

The Influence of Working Memory Load of Binding on Selective Attention

Retaining Quantitative-dimension Binding in Working Memory: A Passive Process

Object-Based Attention Underlies the Rehearsal of Feature Binding in Visual Working Memory

Unraveling the Binding Problem in Working Memory: Insights from the Hierarchical Binding Model

Visual Working Memory for Dynamic Objects: Impaired Binding Between Object Feature and Location

Retaining Event Files in Working Memory Requires Extra Object-Based Attention Than the Constituent Elements.

Agent identity drives adaptive encoding of biological motion into working memory.

Rehearsing Biological Motion in Working Memory: an EEG Study.

Does the Presence of More Features in a Bound Representation in Working Memory Require Extra Object-Based Attention?

Event-based Encoding of Biological Motion and Location in Visual Working Memory.

The Role of Location-Context Binding in Nonspatial Visual Working Memory