Abstract:Medical PhysicsVolume 37, Issue 6Part27 p. 3435-3436 Fifty-second annual meeting of the american association of physicists in medicine WE-E-BRA-02: Clinical Evaluation of Fixed-Field IMRT Plans and IMAT Plans in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer H Zhang, H Zhang University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MDSearch for more papers by this authorR Meyer, R Meyer University of Wisconsin, Madison, WISearch for more papers by this authorS Naqvi, S Naqvi University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MDSearch for more papers by this authorL Shi, L Shi University of Wisconsin, Madison, WISearch for more papers by this authorW D'Souza, W D'Souza University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MDSearch for more papers by this author H Zhang, H Zhang University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MDSearch for more papers by this authorR Meyer, R Meyer University of Wisconsin, Madison, WISearch for more papers by this authorS Naqvi, S Naqvi University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MDSearch for more papers by this authorL Shi, L Shi University of Wisconsin, Madison, WISearch for more papers by this authorW D'Souza, W D'Souza University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MDSearch for more papers by this author First published: 02 June 2010 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3469424About ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the treatment plan quality and delivery efficiency of fixed-field IMRT and IMAT in locally advanced head and neck cancer cases. Method and Materials: Ten locally advanced head and neck cases were included. For each case, the treatment targets involve primary tumor, positive lymph node(s), high risk and low risk nodal volumes. Organs-at-risk included both parotids and spinal cord. Seven-beam IMRT plans were generated using the Pinnacle3 planning system and an in-house developed sequential linear program (SLP) optimization approach. The SLP approach solved the corresponding dose optimization problem by dividing the problem into sub-problems, each of which was solved using LP while maintaining a global view of the full problem. Single-arc and double-arc IMAT plans with 180 and 360 total apertures, respectively were generated using Pinnacle SmartArc 9.0. Plan quality was compared with DVHs and quantitative dose-volume measures and delivery efficiency was compared with MUs and aperture number. Results: Single-arc plans did not provide enough coverage for all three targets. Two-arc plans improved the plan quality compared to single-arc plans. Conventional fixed-field IMRT and SLP plans resulted in better plan quality than IMAT plans with SLP plans outperforming the other approaches. Improvements in parotid dose-volume levels and maximum cord dose were 12% and 90% when SLP was compared to two-arc plans. Approximately 160 to 230 apertures were used with conventional IMRT plans. SLP used fewer apertures than conventional IMRT but used more monitor units. Double-arc plan used more monitor units than the single-arc plan. Overall, IMAT plans used fewer MUs than IMRT plans. Conclusion: Our results indicate that (1) fixed-field IMRT plans (particularly the ones optimized using the SLP approach) result in superior dosimetric quality compared with IMAT and (2) IMAT plans result in greater delivery efficiency compared with IMRT. Conflict of Interest: NIH grant CA130814 Volume37, Issue6Part27June 2010Pages 3435-3436 RelatedInformation

A Dosimetric Comparison of the Fixed-Beam IMRT Plans Using Different Leaf Width of Multileaf Collimators for the Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer

A dosimetric comparison of the tangential beams IMRT with multifield beams IMRT of the chest wall in postmastectomy breast cancer recurrent patients

Analysis of Dosimetric Results of Postoperative Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Using Single-Energy or Mixed-Energy Photons in Invasive Thymoma Patients

Impact Of Interfractional Motion On Hypofractionated Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy And Vmat Delivery For Prostate Cancer

Comparison of the Effects of Two Types of Multileaf Collimators on Tumor Control Probability in Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer after Conservative Surgery Based on the EUD Model ⁎

Evaluation Of The Dosimetric Impact Of Interfractional Anatomical Variations On Prostate Proton Therapy Using Daily In-Room Ct Images

Impact of Different Beam Set-Up Methods on Quality of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

Optimum Treatment Mode Applied to Post-Operative Cervical Cancer for 5F-Imrt Plan Based on Four Variables in Varian Eclipse Tps

Treatment plan comparison of Linac step and shoot,Tomotherapy, RapidArc, and Proton therapy for prostate cancer using dosimetrical and biological index

MRI-based IMRT planning for MR-linac: comparison between CT- and MRI-based plans for pancreatic and prostate cancers

Dosimetric study of tangential and multi-fields applied in the dynamic intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery

[Dosimetric Evaluation of Intensity-Modulated Tangential Beam Versus Conventional Tangential Irradiation for Breast Cancer].

Impact of Multileaf Collimator Configuration Parameters on the Dosimetric Accuracy of 6-MV Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans

A Dosimetric Comparison Between Conventional Fractionated and Hypofractionated Image-guided Radiation Therapies for Localized Prostate Cancer

Comparison of Dosimetric Effects of MLC Positional Errors on VMAT and IMRT Plans for SBRT Radiotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Beam Angle Selection Method to Improve Plan Robustness Against Position Error in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer

Dosimetric Evaluation of Different IMRT Treatment Plans for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

WE-E-BRA-02: Clinical Evaluation of Fixed-Field IMRT Plans and IMAT Plans in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Dose differences in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans calculated with pencil beam and Monte Carlo for lung SBRT

Dosimetric Comparisons of IMRT Planning Using MCO and DMPO Techniques.

WE-C-M100F-05: Methodology and Guidelines in Treatment Planning of IMRT for Lung Cancers