Abstract:Intensity-modulated radiation treatment (IMRT) plan optimization needs beamlet dose distributions. Pencil-beam or superposition/convolution type algorithms are typically used because of their high computational speed. However, inaccurate beamlet dose distributions may mislead the optimization process and hinder the resulting plan quality. To solve this problem, the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation method has been used to compute all beamlet doses prior to the optimization step. The conventional approach samples the same number of particles from each beamlet. Yet this is not the optimal use of MC in this problem. In fact, there are beamlets that have very small intensities after solving the plan optimization problem. For those beamlets, it may be possible to use fewer particles in dose calculations to increase efficiency. Based on this idea, we have developed a new MC-based IMRT plan optimization framework that iteratively performs MC dose calculation and plan optimization. At each dose calculation step, the particle numbers for beamlets were adjusted based on the beamlet intensities obtained through solving the plan optimization problem in the last iteration step. We modified a GPU-based MC dose engine to allow simultaneous computations of a large number of beamlet doses. To test the accuracy of our modified dose engine, we compared the dose from a broad beam and the summed beamlet doses in this beam in an inhomogeneous phantom. Agreement within 1% for the maximum difference and 0.55% for the average difference was observed. We then validated the proposed MC-based optimization schemes in one lung IMRT case. It was found that the conventional scheme required 106 particles from each beamlet to achieve an optimization result that was 3% difference in fluence map and 1% difference in dose from the ground truth. In contrast, the proposed scheme achieved the same level of accuracy with on average 1.2 × 105 particles per beamlet. Correspondingly, the computation time including both MC dose calculations and plan optimizations was reduced by a factor of 4.4, from 494 to 113 s, using only one GPU card.

Dosimetric Comparisons of IMRT Planning Using MCO and DMPO Techniques.

A Feedback Constraint Optimization Method for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy

Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy Using Multicriteria Optimization for Body and Extremity Sarcoma.

3D conformal planning using low segment multi-criteria IMRT optimization

Use of a Correlation Analysis Model in the Optimization of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer.

Dosimetric comparison of VMAT standard optimization (SO) and multi‐criteria optimization (MCO) treatment plans with standard mode delivery (STD) or sliding window (SW) for head and neck cancer

MO-D-351-05: A “slicing” Approach for IMRT Optimization Using Linear Programming

Assessment of multi-criteria optimization (MCO) for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT)

Multicriteria Optimization Achieves Superior Normal Tissue Sparing in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Gastric Cancer

Comparative Study of Eclipse and RayStation Multi-Criteria Optimization-Based Prostate Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Quality

A Dosimetric Comparison of the Fixed-Beam IMRT Plans Using Different Leaf Width of Multileaf Collimators for the Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer

Applying mixed-integer linear programming to the non-coplanar beam angle optimization of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for liver cancer

SU‐E‐T‐175: Clinical Evaluations of Monte Carlo‐Based Inverse Treatment Plan Optimization for Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy

Automatic treatment planning for radiotherapy: a cross-modality and protocol study

A New Monte Carlo-based Treatment Plan Optimization Approach for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

Dosimetric study of tangential and multi-fields applied in the dynamic intensity modulated radiotherapy plans for breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery

SU‐F‐T‐205: Effectiveness of Robust Treatment Planning to Account for Inter‐ Fractional Variation in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Head Neck Cancer

MO-G-304-04: Generating Well-Dispersed Representations of the Pareto Front for Multi-Criteria Optimization in Radiation Treatment Planning

Dosimetrical Optimization Study of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Intact Breast

Robust Optimization in Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy to Account for Anatomy Changes in Lung Cancer Patients