Abstract:Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the characteristics of delayed panfacial fractures and evaluate treatment results.Patients and Methods: Thirty-three patients with delayed panfacial fractures were treated in the Maxillofacial Trauma Center of Peking University, School and Hospital of Stomatology between 1998 and 2004. Each patient was examined by computed tomography (CT) scans before operation. For those who had no severe opening restriction, dental impressions were taken to fabricate dental casts. For those with severely comminuted fractures, 3-dimensional (3D) models of the facial skeleton were used. Re-establishing the continuity of the mandible was the first step and then used as a platform to reconstruct the maxillary fractures via maxillomandibular fixation after Le Fort I osteotomy. The third step was to restore the mid- and upper-facial width and projection by coronal approach to expose the zygomatic complex and frontal bone/sinus and/or naso-orbito-ethmoid (NOE) fractures.Results: There were 3 types of mandibular fractures that affected the treatment plan: 1) type 1, mandibular body/symphysis fracture(s) (17/33, 51-52%); 2) type 11, mandibular angle and/or condylar fracture(s) (6/33, 18.18%); and 3) type 111, both mandibular body/symphysis and angle/condylar fractures (10/33, 30-30%). Fourteen cases were associated with NOE fractures (42.42%) and 3 cases had frontal sinus fractures (9.1%). Twelve cases had enophthalmos (36-36%) and 3 lost 1 eyeball. The order of treatment was dependent on the mandibular fracture type. For type I fractures, reconstructing the mandibular arch was the first step. For type 11 fractures, repairing the angle, ascending rami, and condylar areas was the first step. For type III fractures, when both mandibular height and arch were disrupted, freeing the malunited angle or condyle was the first step before restoring the mandibular arch form. Reconstruction of the mandibular height and projection was then carried out. For all 3 types, the second step was to restore the mid- and upper facial width and projection by reducing the zygomatic complex and frontal bone/sinus or NOE fractures. Maxillary fixation across the Le Fort I level was the last step. Le Fort I osteotomy was used for all 33 cases. Bone grafts and soft tissue suspension also were used. Twenty-one cases (63.64%) had good results, 7 (21.21%) cases were acceptable, and 5 (15.15%) were not good. There were 7 cases (21.21%) that still had soft tissue problems that needed secondary operations.Conclusions: Reconstruction of the mandible first with Le Fort I osteotomy is a good way to treat delayed panfacial fractures. Computed tomography and 3D CT, model surgery, and occasionally 3D models are necessary aids for diagnosis and treatment. Soft tissue Problems, including lacerations and asymmetries, were often the factors that caused an unfavorable outcome. (c) 2007 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

Delayed pan-facial fractures-injury patterns associated with deficient treatment results and clinical classification

Panfacial Fractures: Analysis of 33 Cases Treated Late

[A Study on the Classification and Treatment of Zygomatic Complex Fractures].

Preoperative evaluation and surgical technique of functional and cosmetic aspects in zygomatic complex fracture patients

A Retrospective Study of 1084 Facial Fractures

A retrospective study of 1009 patients with oral and maxillofacial fresh trauma

[A Retrospective Study of 1 009 Patients with Oral and Maxillofacial Fresh Trauma].

Treatment of mandible fractures: A retrospective clinical analysis of 148 cases

A New Classification of Maxillary Defect and Simultaneous Accurate Reconstruction

Proposal for a modified classification of isolated zygomatic arch fractures

Retrospective clinical analysis of 56 cases of condylar fractures

[Clinical Classification and Treatment Decision of Implant Fracture].

[CT Analysis of Classification of External Nasal Fracture and the Influence of Fractured Position to Nasal Septum].

Repositioning Complex Midface Fractures via Coronal Incision Combined with Subciliary Incision Approach

Analysis of Pediatric Maxillofacial Trauma in North China: Epidemiology, Pattern, and Management.

A NEW CLASSIFICATION OF MANDIBULAR DEFECTS FOR SURGICAL RECONSTRUCTION

Novel Tripartite Classification for Fractures of Coronoid Process of Mandible: A Retrospective Tertiary Center Study

Classification and Characteristics of Pterygoid Process Fracture Associated with Maxillary Transverse Fracture

[Diagnosis and Treatment of Sever Craniofacial Compound Injure].

Investigation of the relationship between facial injuries and traumatic brain injuries using a realistic subject-specific finite element head model

Analysis of Pediatric Maxillofacial Fractures: A 10-year Retrospective Study