Comparative analysis of ultrasonic elastography and conventional ultrasound for thyroid nodules

JIANG Jue,LI Miao,ZHOU Qi,DU Xiaopeng,LEI Xiaoying
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-6978.2013.03.015
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To assess the value of ultrasonic elastography (UE)and conventional ultrasound in differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Methods Two hundred and fourteen patients with 233 thyroid nodules confirmed by pathology were retrospectively comparatively analyzed by UE and conventional ultrasound. Results In 233 nodules,158 nodules (including 136 benign nodules and 22 malignant nodules)were accurately diagnosed by conventional ultrasound,222 nodules (including 187 benign nodules and 35 malignant nodules)were accurately diagnosed by UE. The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and diagnostic coincidence rate of conventional ultrasound were 56.4%,70.1%,27.5%, 88.9% and 67.8%,while for UE were 89.7%,96.4%,83.3%,97.9% and 95.3%,respectively. There was significant difference for each index between the two methods(all P<0.01). Conclusion Ultrasonic elastosonography is very helpful in differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?