Abstract:The integrated development of urban and rural areas requires that the government take responsibility for the overall development of the countryside. Chinese agricultural and rural policies characterized by state intervention and government leadership have played an important role in promoting agricultural development and increasing farmers' incomes as well as balancing development in urban and rural areas. However, the effectiveness of current agricultural policies in promoting agricultural productivity is now clearly leveling off. Given this situation, the authors argue that it is imperative to construct a new analytical framework featuring government regulation and guidance of agricultural and rural development. In this framework, the government must clearly define the boundaries between its activities and those of the market and rural social organizations. While fully respecting the fundamental role of the market in allocation of resources and rural self-management, the government should exercise its power as a backstop. Further, the government needs to establish a logical sequence for government functions such as formulating the basic operating system of the market and society, correcting market failure and social dysfunction and cultivating market/social entities. To use this new analytical framework to strengthen and improve its regulation and guidance of agricultural and rural development, the government needs to reform the basic rural management and agricultural support and protection systems and to pay attention to the cultivation of market entities in agricultural production on the basis of agricultural marketization. Furthermore, it needs to construct a basic urban-rural integrated public service system with the government as the leading actor, carry out innovations in the management system of rural society and fully mobilize the social forces to take part in the administration of public affairs. It also needs to reconstruct the system of government administration and management to ensure the thorough implementation of agricultural and rural development policies.

The Government Health Input and Health Care Industrialization

Essential Content of Health Care Industrialization Reform

Analysis of the Connotation of Health Care Industrialization

The Heterogeneous Impacts of Government on Health System Efficiency in China's New Health Reform, 2010-2019

Health in China. the Healthcare Market.

The Pattern of Government Health Expenditure in China

Government's goal and responsibility in public health

The Relationship Between Government on One Side and the Market and Society on the Other in China's Agricultural and Rural Development: an Analytical Framework

A Restricted View on Medical Insurance System Reform and Development in the 21th Century

The Effect of Health Care Industry on Industrial Structure:A Macro Evidence from Countries Like OECD Members

Role of American government in health care sector of the United States

Discussion on the Regulation Effect of Government in Health Care

Analysis of the Government Responsibility of Introducing the Social Capital to the Public Hospital

The Transformation of Public Finances and the Return to Government Responsibility for Funding Public Health

More Discussion on the Role and Action of the Government in the Reform of Public Hospitals

Study on Financial Input of Government Related to the Essential Medicine Policy and Other Supporting Systems in Shandong Province

The Measurement of In/output effects of Science and Technology in Shanghais Industry Company——An Input PerSpective Based on Science and Technology of Government Finance

The Role of Government in the Course of Hospital Supervision

An introduction of project "Policy analysis on health care industrialization"

The Transition of System the Medical and Health of Period the Public Sanitary Service of Reform and Government Function Determine

The Efficiency Model of the State-Owned Medical Institutions