THE DIFFERENT INFLUENCE BETWEEN MILLARD -LIP-REPAIR AND TENNISON -LIP-REPAIR ON MAXILLARY GROWTH:A CONTRAST STUDY IN RABBITS

石冰,龙洁,王晴,乔鞠
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-4979.2000.02.015
2000-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the difference and similarity of the maxillary growth after lip repair between with the Millard Rotation Advancement and with the Tennison Triangular.Methods Fourth Japan white Rabbits were divied into 4 groups in random. Group Ⅰ was unoperated controls, Group Ⅱ was unrepaired controls, Group Ⅲ was repaired by Millard lip repair, Group Ⅳ was repaired by Tennison lip repair. All the animals were sacrified and measured at 26 weeks postoperatively (30 weeks old).Results We found that both the two cheiloplasty had inhibited the maxillary growth, furthermore, The Group Ⅳ (Tennison lip repair) had the more inhibitory effect than Group Ⅲ (Millard lip repair), it is because the different soft tissue movement of upper lip after lip repair with two different cheiloplasty.Conclusion There are some different on maxillary growth in unilateral cleft lip repair between with millard and Tennison method.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?