Modified Millard Repair of the Incomplete Unilateral Cleft Lip
Xing He,Hua Li,Ying Hu,Yan Shao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e318267d9ab
2012-01-01
Abstract:Sir:FigureThe Millard technique and the Tennison technique are now widely accepted as treatments for incomplete unilateral cleft lip–cleft palate. With the technique of repositioning the anatomical signs in a “cut-as-you-go” technique, it is difficult to grasp the incision; thus, the lip height of the Millard technique is always too short and the lip height of the Tennison technique is always too long.1 In this communication, we describe the use of a modified Millard technique as a promising one that may overcome these drawbacks. Our series was composed of 22 children with incomplete unilateral cleft lip–cleft palate. All were operated on by one experienced surgeon with the modified Millard technique at 8.5 months of age, and the mean follow-up was 12.1 months (range, 10.4 to 15.2 months). The technique was presented based on the Millard technique2 and two notable changes were as follows: (1) point 5 was located on the angular bisector of angle 2-1-3; and (2) we cut through the skin, muscle, and mucosa along the different lines. In addition, we dissected the orbicularis oris from the skin and mucosa for a distance of 3 to 4 mm and rotated the skin, muscle, and mucosa step by step. The markings and incisions of our technique are presented in Figure 1.Fig. 1: (Left) Diagrammatic representation of the lip deformity showing incisions marked for a modified Millard technique. (Right) The marking and incision of our modified Millard technique during the operation.We measured the bilateral lip heights, lip widths, and widths of nasal floor3 preoperatively and 7 and 12 months postoperatively. Then we used a ratio (ratio = distance of cleft side/noncleft side) to facilitate the comparison. All data are listed in Table 1. Data at 12 months after surgery show that the lip heights obtained at 7 days were maintained in 64 percent of the cases. The tendency to maintain the measurement unchanged is more accentuated among cases that were shorter on the cleft side 7 days after surgery (100 percent). In cases that were equal 7 days after surgery, 83 percent were unchanged at 12 months. Six of seven cases that were longer on the cleft side 7 days after surgery became equal and the other one remained longer. These data interestingly hint at a logical theory: to obtain a proportional lip height of incomplete unilateral cleft lip patients, the operated lip should be repaired symmetrical to the noncleft side or repaired a little longer than the noncleft side.Table 1: Results of Lip and Nasal Floor GrowthWith statistical analysis, we found only two linear relationships: one between the lip heights at 7 days and 12 months after surgery (R = 0.64, p = 0.001), and the other one between the width of the nasal floor at 7 days and 12 months after surgery (R = 0.638, p = 0.001). There was no linear relationship between the preoperative and postoperative lip appearance and nasal floor. In other words, for patients with incomplete unilateral cleft lip, the most important step is the primary repair, and the preoperative appearance of the lip and nasal floor does not affect postoperative appearance (Fig. 2).Fig. 2: (Above, left) The case of a child with severe disproportionate lip height, lip width, and nasal floor before surgery. (Above, right) The same child had good symmetry of the upper lip and a slightly disproportionate nasal floor 7 days after surgery. (Below) The same child had good symmetry of the upper lip and a slightly disproportionate nasal floor 12 months after surgery.In our opinion, point 5 in our modified technique is located between point 5 in the Millard technique and in the Tennison technique so that, theoretically, lip symmetry is better with our technique. Xing He, M.D. Hua Li, M.D. Ying Hu, M.D. Yan Shao, M.D. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital Medical College Zhejiang University Hang Zhou, People's Republic of China DISCLOSURE The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.