Endovascular Strategy for Endovascular Treatment of Traumatic Carotid-Cavernous Sinus Fistula

宋冬雷,冷冰,顾宇翔,周良辅,陈衔城

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1001-2346.2004.03.014

2004-01-01

Abstract:Objective To summarize the endovascular methods for the treatment of traumatic carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas (TCCF) according to their image-based types. Methods 46 TCCF patients were admitted to our department from February 2000 to February 2003, their image-based types, endovascular embolizatian techniques and outcomes of the treatments were analyzed retrospectively. Results Patients of Type I were treated by the detachable balloon technique in 30 cases, microcoils fistila embolization in 3cases, cavernous sinus embolization in 4 cases (transarterial approach in 2 cases, transvenous approach in 2 cases) and internal carotid artery occlusion in 3 cases. Patients of Type II were treated by cavernous sinus embolization in 2 cases (transarterial approach in 1 case, transvenous approach in 1 case), and carotid artery compression therapy in 1 case. Patients of Type III were treated by bilateral detachable balloon technique in 3 cases. All the 46 cases were cured, the rate of internal carotid artery patency was 94% (43/46). After the embolization, all patients were followed up for 3～36 months, 2 patients had pseudoaneurysms, one of them was embolized by GDC for obvious symptoms, the other asymptomatic pseudoaneurysm was not treated. There was no death or other complication in this group. Conclusion Although the Detachable balloon technique is the first choice of treatment for TCCF, the microcoils is a good alternative treatment when the orifice of the fistula is too small to allow entry of the balloon, and the venous approaches should be used if the transarterial approachs failed for type I or type II patients. The internal carotid artery occlusion can be considered only when all the transarterial and transvenous approachs failed for type I patients.