Comparing the two diagnostic criteria for infective endocarditis

CHEN Fan,QIAN Zhi-yong,PENG Zhi-yong,XIE Wei,ZHANG Sai-dan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2010.01.018
2010-01-01
Abstract:[Objective]To study the clinic medical character of infective endocarditis,and to compare the sensitivity of the Chinese diagnostic criteria and the Duke diagnostic criteria for infective endocarditis (IE) in medical practice. [Method]The sensitivity predictive value of these two sets of diagnostic criteria were determined by retrospective analyzing of 119 cases of infective endocarditis confirmed by pathological diagnosis. [Result]65 of 119 patients did blood culture for more than twice,the same microorganisms were detected positive twice in blood culture in 26 patients (30.6%).The vegetation were detected by echecardiography in 117 of 119 patients (98.3%).14 (11.8%) cases are valvular and perivalvular destruction.116 patients (97.5%) had basic heart disease and high risk factors.The sensitivity of the Chinese and Duke diagnostic criteria are 95% and 58.9% respectively,and has statistically difference (P<0.01).[Conclusion]The Chinese diagnostic criteria is significantly more sensitivity than the Duke criteria for the diagnostic of patients with infective endocarditis followed in medical practice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?