Values of the Duke Criteria for the Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis in Children

陈树宝,孙锟,黄美蓉,王荣发,郝名华
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:0578-1310.2001.05.002
2001-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore values of the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of pediatric infective endocarditis (IE). Methods Fifty children with the infective endocarditis detected by the echocardiography, 13 of them proved by the surgery, were classified by using the Duke criteria and analyzed.Results The same microorganism was detected in blood cultures two or more than two times in 15 patients (30%). Ten of 50 patients (20%) were revealed with one positive blood culture. Vegetations were detected by echocardiography in 39 patients (78%), 26 of them with oscillating vegetations, one patient with the valve perforation, one patient with new partial dehiscence of VSD′s patch. Forty five patients (90%) had predisposing heart conditions, 43 (86%) with the congenital heart disease. Fever was detected in 45 patients (86%). Thirtean patients complicated with the heart failure, 4 of them had no fever. Vascular phenomena including petechiae and major arterial emboli occurred in 11 patients (24%). Immunologic phenomena occurred in 5 patients, of whom 3 with glomerulonephritis and 2 with elevated rheumatoid factor. In 50 patients, a definite diagnosis of IE was made in 21 patients according to the Duke criteria, of whom 12 patients met two major criteria, 9 patients met one major and more than three minor criteria. One patient was ruled out from the diagnosis of IE. In 13 IE patients proved by surgery, 5 patients (38%) were diagnosed with definite IE, 8 patients were misclassified as possible IE, of whom 6 patients met one major and two minor criteria and 2 patients showed the association with one major and one minor criteria. The negative blood culture was reported in 10 of the 13 IE patients proved by surgery, and 2 of the 13 showed a non oscillating vegetation.Conclusion The detection of vegetation by using echocardiography is important and significant in the diagnosis of IE. The vegetation should not be defined to oscillating intracardiac mass in pediatric patient. In patient with prior antibiotic therapy, definite IE could be considered in the presence of typical echocardiographic evidence of endocardial involvement and two minor criteria. Therefore, the sensitivity of Duke criteria for the diagnosis of IE need to be further improved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?