The optimization of diffusion-weighted imaging parameters in esophageal cancer and comparison with X-ray double-contrast imaging, CT, MR T2WI and pathology

WANG Ning,ZHANG Xiao-peng,TANG Lei,SUN Ying-shi,CAO Kun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1003-3289.2005.12.010
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the technical feasibility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) of esophageal tumor and the choice of b value and compare the difference among DWI, X-ray double-contrast imaging, CT and MR T2WI in displaying of the lesion extent. Methods Thirty-two patients with esophageal cancer were examined at 1.5T MR scanner. The conventional and DW-MRI were both imaged at axial plane. The b values were 200, 300, 500, 800, 1000 s/mm2. Signal-intensity ratio (SIR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated and compared between DWI and T2WI. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were calculated and the appropriated b value was determined. The extent of the lesion was measured on DWI, X-ray double-contrast imaging, CT, MR T2WI, and pathology results. Results The SIRs had no statistical difference between T2WI and DWI with different b values (P>0.05), but the CNRs had statistical difference between T2WI and DWI with b values of 200, 300 and 500 s/mm2 (P>0.05). There was statistical difference between DWI with b values of 200, 300, 500 s/mm2 and those with 800 and 1000 s/mm2 (P>0.05), b=500 s/mm2 was a preferred choice. There was no statistical difference in the defining of lesion extent between DWI (b=500 s/mm2) and pathology result, X-ray double-contrast imaging, and T2WI (P>0.05). Conclusion Satisfied diffusion weighted images can be achieved through the combination of 8-channel phase array coil and ASSET techniques with a b value of 500 s/mm2. The extent of lesions on DWI has no difference with pathology results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?