Two different anesthesia methods for upper ureteral calculi: a prosective randomized controlled study

LI Teng-cheng,WU Jie-ying,ZHAN Hai-lun,HU Cheng,SITU Jie,LI Liao-yuan,GAO Xin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2013.06.006
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSEA) and general anesthesia(GA) for ureteroscopic lithotripsy with the holmium laser. Methods Between October 2010 and March 2012, patients with upper ureteral stone were randomly selected for CSEA or GA using envelopes and enrolled in this study. The clinical characteristics of patients as patients ′ blood pressure, heart rate, oxyhemoglobin saturation, operative difficulty and side-effects in these two groups were evaluated. Results The ureteroscopic procedure was completed successfully in 194 patients, 89 patients in CSEA group, 105 patients in GA group. No significant differences were found between the two groups of characteristics and changs of blood pressure, heart rate, oxyhemoglobin saturation during the operation. The patients in GA group had a statistically significant stone-free rate, lower operative difficulty and fewer operative side-effects compared with the other group(P <0.05). However, the hospitalization expenses of GA patients are significantly higher(P<0.05). Conclusion Both CSEA and EA are applicable to ureteroscopic lithotripsy with the holmium laser for upper ureteral calculi, GA is safer and more efficient than CSEA for this operation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?