Abstract:Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of two procedures in the treatment of hemorrhoid: the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR). Methods: A retrospective cohort research was conducted. Clinical data of 263 patients undergoing the first elective surgery for grade IV hemorrhoids by the same team of surgeons at our department from January 2015 to December 2016 were analyzed retrospectively, while those had other anorectal diseases, emergency surgery, inflammatory bowel disease, tumor and incomplete clinical data were excluded. PPH was performed in 129 patients and STARR was performed in 134 patients. PPH procedure: a circular purse 2-0 string suture was made at 4 cm above the dentate line; in accordance with the standard protocol, the PPH circular stapling devicewas introduced; the suture was closed, and a pull-through followed; the traction was continued; the stapler was fired; the prolapsed mucosa and submucosa were removed. STARR procedure: 3-5 needles were sutured in the anterior rectal mucosa, protecting the posterior wall mucosa; with the help of a finger the PPH stapler was inserted into the vaginal lumen; the sutures were hooked from both sides of the stapler to maintain traction; according to the disease condition, the suturewas tightened appropriately; stapler was screwed and activated; the anterior wall mucosa was removed; the joint of the both ends of anastomosis was cut; the posterior wall mucosa was removed as well. The short-term efficacy, surgical safety and prognosis of the two groups were compared. Results: There were 67 males (51.9%) in the PPH group and 57 (42.5%) males in the STARR group. The median age of the two groups was 51.0 (22.0, 80.0) years and 49.0 (24.0, 74.0) years, respectively. There were no significant differences in the baseline data between the two groups (all P>0.05). No significant differences in the intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, postoperative analgesic drug use, postoperative bleeding, postoperative infection, etc. were found between two groups (all P>0.05). As compared to PPH group, STAAR group had longer operation time and higher hospitalization cost with significant differences [(44.0±19.3) minutes vs. (26.3±8.5) minutes, t=9.701, P=0.001; (11 047±473) yuan vs. (7674±309) yuan, t=32.826, P=0.001]. One case in STAAR group developed rectovaginal fistula. The median follow-up period of the whole group was 40 (33, 52) months. A total of 108 cases in STARR group and 114 cases in PPH group completed the follow-up. The 3-year disease-relapse rate was 0 in STARR group and 4.2% in PPH group (P=0.042). Conclusion: STARR procedure can improve the prognosis in the treatment of grade IV hemorrhoid, but attention should be paid to the development of complications.

A Study of the Curative Effect of TST in Combination with Shaobei Injection in the Treatment of Severe Hemorrhoids

Clinical application of PPH in treatment of severe hemorrhoids

Clinical Investigation of RPH Combined with Hemorrhoidlysant Injection in the Treatment of Hemorrhoids for 80 Cases

Comparative Research of Tissue-selecting Therapy and Precedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids on Treating Hemorrhoids

Therapeutic analysis of 226 cases with severe hemorrhoids treated by PPH

Comparison of Curative Effect Between Tissue-Selecting Therapy Stapler and Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids for Stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ Hemorrhoids

A Clinical Analysis of Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids in the Treatment of 320 Severe Hemorrhoids

Clinical Study of Shaobei Injectioncombined with Methylthioninium Chloride in the Operation of Circumferential Mixed Hemorrhoids By Millian-morgan,s

Curative Effect Observation on Acute Hemorrhoids by Shentong Zhuyu Decoction（身痛逐瘀汤）

[Procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids versus stapled transanal rectal resection in the treatment of grade IV hemorrhoids].

[Efficacy of the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids combined with external hemorrhoids excision in the treatment of III or IV mixed hemorrhoids]

Clinical Study of Segmentation and Ligation to Treat 30 Cases of Severe Mixed Hemorrhoids

Modified stapled hemorrhoidopexy for lower postoperative stenosis: A five-year experience

Thrombus removal of external hemorrhoid combined with procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoidsin the treatment of incarcerated circumferential mixed hemorrhoids

Effect of High Suspension and Low Incision Surgery Based on Traditional Ligation of Chinese Medicine in Treatment of Mixed Haemorrhoids: A Multi-centre, Randomized, Single-Blind, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial

Stapled transanal rectal resection versus procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids for the treatment of grade Ⅳ hemorrhoids

The Use of the Improvement of the Procedure for Prolapse & Hemorrhoids in Serious Hemorrhoids

Clinical Study of the Analgesic Effect of Acupuncture Plus Auricular Point Plaster Therapy after Mixed Hemorrhoid Surgery

A NEW MIXED SURGICAL TREATMENT FOR GRADES III AND IV HEMORRHOIDS: MODIFIED SELECTIVE HEMORRHOIDECTOMY COMBINED WITH COMPLETE ANAL EPITHELIAL RETENTION

Evaluation of clinical efficacy of suture-fixation mucopexy in the treatment of prolapsed hemorrhoid

The efficiency and safety of modified tissue-selecting therapy stapler combined with complete anal canal epithelial preservation operation in circumferential mixed hemorrhoids: a randomized controlled trial