A Comparison of Renewable Energy Policies in Imperfect Competition Electricity Market

WU Li-bo,SUN Ke-ge,CHEN Ya-long
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2015.10.008
2015-01-01
Abstract:Feed-in Tariff and Renewable Portfolio Standard are the most widely adopted policies to promote development of renewable energy. The comparison of effectiveness of the two policies is the focus for theoretical and political study in the environmental economics area, especially when there is distortion caused by monopoly power in the electricity market. In this paper, we compare the difference between Feed-in Tariff policy and Renewable Portfolio Standard policy in promoting the use of green electricity generated from wind in an incomplete competitive electricity market through the analysis of a partial equilibrium model in which there are two kinds of electricity plants specializing in traditional electricity generation and green energy generation respectively. It is found that, in a duopoly competitive market, the FIT policy tends to be more effective in promoting green electricity generation than the RPS policy, since the latter leads to higher electricity price, thus reducing market demand for the green energy. The empirical test of the EU panel data from 2004 to 2011 shows that the FIT policy boosts the amount of electricity generated from wind significantly, while the RPS policy increases the share of renewable energy use in the EU with no significant effect on the amount of green electricity generation. The basic mechanism behind this is that although RPS leads to higher electricity price and lower electricity demand, it increases the share of green electricity consumption. Monopoly of the electricity market is proved to have a negative effect on wind electricity generation. Other control variables like electricity market size, technology and other renewable energy policies also have influence on the wind electricity generation as predicted. In a threshold panel data model, the paper finds that when the degree of monopoly in the electricity market is higher than 35%, which implies that the largest electricity firm in the country grabs more than one third of the market share, monopoly has a more significant negative impact on the green electricity generation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?