Which policy can promote renewable energy to achieve grid parity? Feed-in tariff vs. renewable portfolio standards

Zhao Xin-gang,Li Pei-ling,Zhou Ying
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.058
IF: 8.7
2020-12-01
Renewable Energy
Abstract:<p>China's electricity market reform poses an urgent demand for grid parity of renewable energy (RE), however, the high initial investment cost makes it difficult to achieve. Although feed-in tariff (FIT) and renewable portfolio standards (RPS) schemes are both practical policy tools to support the development of the RE industry, which policy is more consistent with the goal of grid parity? Accordingly, based on the system dynamic model, this research studies the levelized cost of RE (LCOE) under FIT and RPS, respectively. The results show that: First, under the current FIT scheme, wind (onshore) and photovoltaic (PV) power both cannot achieve grid parity. To realize it, extra payouts in four categories of areas should at least be 0.236, 0.244, 0.299 and 0.261 CNY/kWh. Similarly, additional subsidies for PV in Tibet and the northwest region except Tibet need to be 0.924 and 0.764 CNY/kWh. Second, under the RPS, wind (onshore) power can basically achieve grid parity, but PV cannot. Subsidies for PV need at least to be 0.525 and 0.364 CNY/kWh to achieve grid parity. Therefore, compared with the current FIT in China, the policy combination of FIT and RPS adjusted to local conditions is more conducive to realizing grid parity.</p>
energy & fuels,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of how renewable energy in China can achieve grid parity. Specifically, the authors explore the effectiveness of two policy tools—Feed-in Tariff (FIT) and Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS)—in promoting renewable energy to achieve grid parity. The study analyzes the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) of renewable energy under different policies through a system dynamics model and compares the effectiveness of these two policies in achieving grid parity in China. ### Background and Problem - **Background**: The reform of China's electricity market urgently requires renewable energy to achieve grid parity, but the high initial investment cost makes this goal difficult to achieve. - **Problem**: Under the current policy environment, which policy tool (FIT or RPS) is more conducive to achieving grid parity for renewable energy? ### Research Methods - **System Dynamics Model**: By establishing a system dynamics model, the LCOE of renewable energy under different policies is simulated. - **Data Sources**: The study selected representative wind farms in four wind resource areas in China and photovoltaic projects in the northwest region to obtain detailed cost data. ### Main Findings - **Under FIT Policy**: - Both wind and photovoltaic power generation cannot achieve grid parity. - Achieving grid parity requires additional subsidies, with subsidy needs of 0.236, 0.244, 0.299, and 0.261 yuan/kWh in different regions. The subsidy needs for photovoltaic in Tibet and the northwest region (excluding Tibet) are 0.924 and 0.764 yuan/kWh, respectively. - **Under RPS Policy**: - Wind power can basically achieve grid parity, but photovoltaic power still requires subsidies, with subsidy needs of 0.525 and 0.364 yuan/kWh, respectively. - **Comprehensive Conclusion**: Compared with the current FIT policy, a combination of FIT and RPS policies adjusted according to local conditions is more conducive to achieving grid parity. ### Significance - **Theoretical Contribution**: The study uses a system dynamics model to quantitatively analyze the impact of different policies on achieving grid parity for renewable energy, filling a gap in existing research. - **Practical Significance**: The research results provide a reference for China and other countries in formulating renewable energy support policies, helping to optimize policy combinations and promote the development and application of renewable energy. ### Conclusion - **Policy Recommendations**: Adjust FIT and RPS policies according to local conditions to achieve grid parity for renewable energy. This will not only help promote the reform of China's electricity market but also enhance the competitiveness of renewable energy and reduce dependence on traditional energy sources.