Abstract:We propose introducing fairness constraints to one of the most famous multi-criteria decision-making methods, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). We offer a solution that guarantees consistency while respecting legally binding fairness constraints in AHP pairwise comparison matrices. Through a synthetic experiment, we generate the comparison matrices of different sizes and ranges/levels of the initial parameters (i.e., consistency ratio and disparate impact). We optimize disparate impact for various combinations of these initial parameters and observed matrix sizes while respecting an acceptable level of consistency and minimizing deviations of pairwise comparison matrices (or their upper triangles) before and after the optimization. We use a metaheuristic genetic algorithm to set the dually motivating problem and operate a discrete optimization procedure (in connection with Saaty's 9-point scale). The results confirm the initial hypothesis (with 99.5% validity concerning 2800 optimization runs) that achieving fair ranking while respecting consistency in AHP pairwise comparison matrices (when comparing alternatives regarding given criterium) is possible, thus meeting two challenging goals simultaneously. This research contributes to the initiatives directed toward unbiased decision-making, either automated or algorithm-assisted (which is the case covered by this research).

A Method for Constructing Perfectly Consistent Judgement Matrix in AHP

Study on the Consistence of Judgement Matrix in AHP

Synchronized Method for Construction a Fuzzy Judgement Matrix and Checking Its Matrix Consistency

An Automatic Method to Reach Consensus in a Local Context for AHP Group Decision Making

Genetic algorithm optimised Hadamard product method for inconsistency judgement matrix adjustment in AHP and automatic analysis system development

A New Method of Improving the Consistency of Fuzzy Judgement Matrices Based on Compatibility

The Analytic Hierarchy Process Based on the Unascertained Three-Valued Judgments

When Fairness Meets Consistency in AHP Pairwise Comparisons

On using pairwise comparison in the analytic hierarchy process: Validity is goal while consistency is means

A Tfn-Based Ahp Method For Solving Multi-Alternative Decision-Making Problems

Ranking Method for the Reciprocal Judgment Matrix Based on the Unascertained Three-Valued Judgments

A note on the proportionality between some consistency indices in the AHP

Is It Reasonable for Saaty's Consistency Test in the Pairwise Comparison Method?

Research on Relations Between Compatibility and Consistency of Combination Judgement Matrices

Inconsistency indices in pairwise comparisons: an improvement of the Consistency Index

Reducing inconsistency measured by the geometric consistency index in the analytic hierarchy process

Research on Compatibility of Fuzzy Judgement Matrices

Inconsistency of the judgment matrix in the AHP method and the decision maker's knowledge

Consistency and Consensus Improving Methods for Pairwise Comparison Matrices Based on Abelian Linearly Ordered Group

Application of a method of processing inconsistency in the judgements of numerous experts

Consistency Improvement in the Analytic Hierarchy Process