Abstract:We propose introducing fairness constraints to one of the most famous multi-criteria decision-making methods, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). We offer a solution that guarantees consistency while respecting legally binding fairness constraints in AHP pairwise comparison matrices. Through a synthetic experiment, we generate the comparison matrices of different sizes and ranges/levels of the initial parameters (i.e., consistency ratio and disparate impact). We optimize disparate impact for various combinations of these initial parameters and observed matrix sizes while respecting an acceptable level of consistency and minimizing deviations of pairwise comparison matrices (or their upper triangles) before and after the optimization. We use a metaheuristic genetic algorithm to set the dually motivating problem and operate a discrete optimization procedure (in connection with Saaty's 9-point scale). The results confirm the initial hypothesis (with 99.5% validity concerning 2800 optimization runs) that achieving fair ranking while respecting consistency in AHP pairwise comparison matrices (when comparing alternatives regarding given criterium) is possible, thus meeting two challenging goals simultaneously. This research contributes to the initiatives directed toward unbiased decision-making, either automated or algorithm-assisted (which is the case covered by this research).

Inconsistency of the judgment matrix in the AHP method and the decision maker's knowledge

An Automatic Method to Reach Consensus in a Local Context for AHP Group Decision Making

Study on the Consistence of Judgement Matrix in AHP

Genetic algorithm optimised Hadamard product method for inconsistency judgement matrix adjustment in AHP and automatic analysis system development

Reducing inconsistency measured by the geometric consistency index in the analytic hierarchy process

Multi-criteria decision making beyond consistency: An alternative to AHP for real-world industrial problems

The Analytic Hierarchy Process Based on the Unascertained Three-Valued Judgments

Synchronized Method for Construction a Fuzzy Judgement Matrix and Checking Its Matrix Consistency

Consistency Indices in Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Review

A note on the proportionality between some consistency indices in the AHP

DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS

Ranking Method for the Reciprocal Judgment Matrix Based on the Unascertained Three-Valued Judgments

On using pairwise comparison in the analytic hierarchy process: Validity is goal while consistency is means

A Tfn-Based Ahp Method For Solving Multi-Alternative Decision-Making Problems

A Comparative Study of AHP and Fuzzy AHP Method for Inconsistent Data

Inconsistency indices in pairwise comparisons: an improvement of the Consistency Index

Application of a method of processing inconsistency in the judgements of numerous experts

Entropy production rate as a criterion for inconsistency in decision theory

Decision Tree and AHP Methods Application for Projects Assessment: A Case Study

Analytic Hierarchy Process in Multiple–Criteria Decision–Making: A Model Example

When Fairness Meets Consistency in AHP Pairwise Comparisons