The International Comparison and Avalue of Owner's Rights and Interests

张晓燕

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-5365.2004.04.015

2004-01-01

Abstract:The paper discovers the advantage and disadvantage of the definition and content of owner's rights and interests,as an accounting factor, by comparating Accounting Standard for Business Enterprises with SFAC and LASC.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Common Institutional Blockholders and Reporting Practices: Evidence from Accounting Comparability

Qiyuan Peng,Sirui Yin,Rui-Zhong Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/horizons-2021-042

2022-03-22

Accounting Horizons

Abstract:This study investigates whether common institutional blockholders (common owners) affect the accounting comparability of their portfolio firms. We document that accounting comparability between a pair of industry peers increases with common ownership presence and intensity. Common owners’ demand for comparability is more pronounced i) when the firm pairs have higher operating uncertainty, ii) when their information environment is opaque, and iii) when they weigh more within the common owners’ portfolio. To address endogeneity concerns, we exploit financial institutions mergers as quasi-exogenous shocks to common ownership. Difference-in-differences tests confirm the positive association between common ownership and accounting comparability. We conclude that common owners are important capital market participants that create a demand for and have a significant impact on accounting comparability. To the extent that achieving higher comparability is an important goal in standard-setting, out study has implications for standard setters and regulators evaluating the determining factors of accounting comparability.

business, finance
Analysis on Internationalization Progress for Chinese Enterprise Accounting Standard

C. Gu

Abstract:With four developments process of the year of 1992,1998,2001,and from 2006 to 2014,the Chinese Enterprises Accounting Standards were gradually jointed track with international standards. Because of Chinese particularity,the Chinese Enterprises Accounting Standards are still different from the international Enterprises Accounting Standards in order to adapt with the utilization of actual accounting treatment in line with the Chinese corporate governance.

Economics,Business
Comparison on Interim Financial Report Standards of China and Vietnam

Chi Zhao-mei

Abstract:The construction of China-ASEAN FTA surely will promote the economic and trade links between China and Vietnam.As an international commercial language,accounting plays an important role in the trade liberalization of China and Vietnam.Financial report is a key means that users learn accounting information like financial position,business performance and cash flow etc.Owning to the difference of accounting environiment in China and Vietnam,the interim financial report standards of the two countries are very different in contents,patterns and disclosure request.Both countries take up the international accounting standards for reference in varying degrees in the process of formulating the financial report standards,but Vietnam's is more detailed in contents and more operational,while China's attaches particular emphasis on its guiding role.Comparing the standards of the both countries is conducive to the improvement of China's interim financial report standard and the development of regional economy.

Economics,Business
The Limitations and Improvements of the Accounting Research on Intangible Assets

Ma Delin,Zhu Yuanwu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2005.04.004

2005-01-01

Abstract:The paper analyzed the present status and explored the issues existed in intangible asset accounting research in the past two years, based on the literatures in this respect published in the following four Journals, the Accounting Research, Finance and Accounting, Business Research and the Journal of Financel and Accounting.The paper finally made some suggestions on how to improve China's intangible asset accounting research.
A Study on Chinese Accounting Research Effects:Based on the Sample of Accounting Research (1982～2002)

Yang Xiongsheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2005.03.014

2005-01-01

Abstract:This paper makes use of the concrete standards of “original-innovation” and “subsequent-innovation” from “The Research on Chinese Accounting Research Norms”.Based on the sample of most papers published in Accounting Research from 1980 to 2002,we attempt to evaluate their academic values.Then we try to evaluate Chinese accounting research in recent 20 years integrally.
Economic Consequence of Internationalization of Accounting Standards:Evidence from China

Fang Junxiong

2009-01-01

Abstract:Based on the promulgation of Chinese corporate accounting standards on February 15th,2006,we study the economic consequence of internationalization of accounting standards.Specifically,we study the market reactions surrounding the event and find the reactions is negative.Further research shows that the market reactions is different with the different characteristics of corporations.So we conclude that the improvement of accounting standards quality does not mean the improvement of accounting information quality and it dependents on other factors.
Ownership Structure,Related Party Transactions and Finn Value——Empirical Study on Listed Firms of China

ZHU Zhi-wen,MA Hao

2009-01-01

Abstract:Through an empirical study on the archival data of listed firms in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges between 2002 and 2006,the authors corroborate the negative value effect of related party transactions and find that the ownership of the largest shareholder,ownership balancing,identity of controlling shareholders,stock incentives for the board/executives,and the proportion of tradable shares are significantly associated with related party transaction.The authors also find an interaction effect between the proportion of tradable shares and the ownership of the largest shareholder,and its policy implications are also discussed.
Accounting Restatements,Ownership Property and Debt Financing

YU JIANQIAO,WANG KUN

2016-01-01

Abstract:Using the firms that disclose accounting restatements during 2001—2009,this paper examines the effect of accounting restatements on corporate debt financing and the role of ownership property on this effect.In contrast to the existing evidence in western countries, we find that in China the listed firms’level of debt financing does not change significantly after accounting restatements,which indicates that creditors don’t pay attention to the default risk and information risk raised by accounting restatements.After distinguishing the owner-ship property,we find that the debt financing of privately owned enterprises decreases signifi-cantly after accounting restatements,but state-owned enterprises are not affected,indicating <br> that financial institutions such as banks show a lending discrimination among firms with different ownership property.The results of this paper have important implications to regula-tors on better allocation of financial resources.
An Empirical Study on the Effects of Ownership Reform in China

Bai Chong-En,Lu Jiangyong,Tao Zhigang

2006-01-01

Abstract:Using a comprehensive panel data set of China's state-owned enterprises, we investigate the impacts of ownership reform and different extent of non-state ownership on social welfare and firm performance. We also consider the sources of the gain in firm performance and the long-run impacts of ownership reform. It is found that ownership reform improves firm performance mainly through reducing managerial expenses, and the social costs of ownership reform are limited compared to international experiences.
State Ownership,Preferential Tax,and Corporate Tax Burdens

Wu Liansheng

2009-01-01

Abstract:The relationship between state ownership and firm value is one of the most important issues in the fields of economics,finance and accounting.Extant literature examined it from the perspective of corporate performance,but hasn't got a conclusion that is widely accepted.One of the main reasons is that the detailed channel through which state ownership affects firm value hasn't been examined.Tax payment is just one of the channels.Little research has examined the relationship between state ownership and firm value from the perspective of corporate tax burden,and tax status hasn't been taken into account.This paper examined the effects of state ownership and preferential tax on corporate tax burdens.It shows that corporate tax burden increased with state ownership,and state ownership brought heavier tax burdens to firms without preferential tax rate than firms with preferential tax rate.The conclusion has implications to the reform of state-owned companies,the tax levy of tax authority and investors' decisions.
The Different Changes of Value Relevance of Earnings Between SOEs and NSOEs after Adoption of IFRS: Evidence from China

Wanli Li,Hong Guo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v32i3.9655

2016-01-01

Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR)

Abstract:This article studies changes of value relevance of earnings after mandatory adoption of new CAS (the Chinese Accounting Standards) which is substantially convergent with IFRS (the International Financial Report Standards) in China’s listed enterprises. We extend the previous research by examining the different impact on value relevance of earnings between SOEs (the State-Owned Enterprises) and NSOEs (the Non-State-Owned Enterprises) after adoption of new CAS, which is based on the samples consisting of 836 companies listed on A-shares market of China. The empirical results show that the value-relevance of accounting earnings significantly increased after 2007, and represent that value relevance of earnings increased significantly in SOEs while there are no significant changes in NSOEs after adoption of the new CAS. Our research has implications for China’s Accounting Standard setters who desire to reach expected consequences of convergence with IFRS, and provide empirical evidence for adoption of IFRS in different countries which have both SOEs and NSOEs.
The Comparison of Experiences to Settle Bad Asset

刘琰,詹原瑞

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-9477.2004.04.024

2004-01-01

Abstract:In recent years Chinese enterprises operate at loss, and the ratio of bad property in Chinese banks is bigger and bigger. Foreign economists and investitors are more and more sceptible about the future of China' s reform and growth. The paper discusses the problem of bad property of banks and utilizing experiences of other nations.
Accounting comparability and the value relevance of earnings and book value

Bingyi Chen,Ahmet C. Kurt,Irene Guannan Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22459

2020-07-17

Abstract:Abstract The value relevance of financial statements is of great significance to investors and standard setters. The present research examines whether accounting comparability among industry peers enhances the value relevance of earnings and book value. This is an important question because both the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the Securities Exchange Commission seek greater comparability in financial reporting. However, there is limited empirical evidence on how comparability affects the value relevance of accounting information in the United States. Our results show that accounting comparability increases the value relevance of earnings, but not book value. That is, when firms exhibit greater accounting comparability vis‐à‐vis industry peers, investors attach higher value to reported earnings. In terms of economic significance, the value relevance of earnings is 25.2% higher when accounting comparability is higher by one standard deviation. However, the incremental benefits of accounting comparability are attenuated when financial reporting opacity is high or when there exists an internal control material weakness over financial reporting. In contrast, comparability benefits are enhanced when an industry specialist auditor is employed. Our results are robust to using different model specifications.
Research of the Chinese Accounting Internationalization

莫鸿芳

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-5097.2002.01.056

2002-01-01

Abstract:This paper introduces the work and process of the Chinese accounting internationalization in accounting rule of law,accounting education and system of the Chinese certified public accountant. The paper also shows what we should pay attention to in the future internationalization of the Chinese accounting.
Comparative Study on Quality Characteristics of International Accounting Standards and Chinese Accounting Standards

Congtong Qiu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v27i.1949

2022-09-06

BCP Business & Management

Abstract:Whether accounting information can meet the needs of users depends on the quality of accounting information. The internationalization level of accounting standards reflects the degree of integration of a country's economy with the world. With the development of economic globalization and rapid progress of science and technology, the market economy is becoming more and more active. Meanwhile, the trade between various countries is becoming more and more frequent, which promotes the economic and trade cooperation between various countries. The demand for international convergence of accounting standards is becoming increasingly strong, and the relevant concept arises at the historic moment. In order to make the cooperation between countries more convenient and fast, countries began to integrate into the financial regulatory framework reform process of cooperation, and strive for the global unified high-quality accounting standards can be completed in a timely manner. This paper compares and analyzes the differences between Chinese and international accounting standards in terms of information quality characteristics from two aspects of content and level, summarizes the convergence and development trend of international accounting standards, and puts forward some suggestions for China to formulate accounting standards.
The Accounting Model Choice for Insurance Contracts and its International Convergence

Xu Xian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13497/j.cnki.is.2010.03.018

2010-01-01

Abstract:There are long-term disputes over whether the accounting valuation of insurance contracts should use the deferral matching approach or the asset liability approach in the international society.The United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US-GAAP) and the German Commercial Code (Handelsgesetzbuch,HGB) apply the deferral matching approach,while the new Chinese Accounting Systems for Business Enterprises (ASBE) as well as the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) apply the asset liability approach in their standards.This article made a theoretical comparison of the deferral matching approach and the asset liability approach,followed by the analysis of the current accounting system of insurance contracts in China,including its contents,the characteristics and its impacts on the accounting quality.The article also gave an overview of the trend of accounting methods for insurance contracts proposed by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in the IFRS 4 (Phase II),and in accordance with that,offered some suggestions for further development of insurance contracts accounting methods in China to meet the challenge of the international accounting convergence.
Research on the Environmental Factors Causing Accounting Differences Between China and Foreign Countries

Ziyun Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26689/pbes.v5i3.3928

2022-06-20

Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies

Abstract:The official release of China’s new accounting standards has realized the convergence of its accounting standards and international accounting practices. However, affected by factors such as the economic environment, political environment, social culture, law, and tax system, there are still some differences between China’s accounting standards and international accounting standards, which will have a certain impact on the realization of the integration of accounting standards. Therefore, this paper analyzes the environmental factors of accounting differences between China and foreign countries, as well as explores specific measures to reduce the accounting differences between China and foreign countries, aiming to provide some useful references and promote the internationalization of China’s accounting standards.
The international harmonization progress of China Accounting Standards: A review of quantitative research

Xiaohui Qu,Fang Gao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-008-0028-1

2008-01-01

Frontiers of Business Research in China

Abstract:In recent years, an increasing number of quantitative researches have been conducted in the field of international harmonization of China Accounting Standards(CAS). However, differences even contradictions do exist in the conclusions due to different research perspectives, samples, variable and period selection as well as the method adopted. Firstly, this paper systematically reviews the quantitative research literature on the international harmonization progress of CAS from the following four aspects: the degree of harmonization of specific items in CAS with that of in International Accounting Standards (IAS), differences in accounting numbers, accounting information, and earnings quality in various financial reports compiled based on CAS or IAS respectively. Lastly, suggestions for future research are provided.
International Convergence and Equivalence of Accounting Standards:China’s Role and Contribution

Wei Ming-hai

Abstract:This paper critically reviews suc h stages as inclusion,comparison,recognition,acceptance,convergence and equivalence during the course of converging toward and equating with the international financial reporting standards by the IASC/IASB.During the course,by setting the accreditation procedures for acceptance of IFRS,European Union exerts pressure on the IASB;in order to fight for the right to speak in establishing international standards,the U.S.FASB has enhanced its co-operation with the IASB.In order to cope with the ever-promoted international accounting standards convergence,China has adopted a series of measures corresponding to each stage of the development of IASC/IASB,improving and perfecting the accounting standard system.Meanwhile,China has set a good example for the emerging markets and countries with transiting economies by strengthening the cooperation with every country and boosting the establishment and improvement of a fair and just mechanism concerning international convergence and equivalence of accounting standards which accords with the interests of the developing countries.

Business,Economics
The harmonization effect of China accounting standards with international accounting standards:A review of quantitative research

Qu Xiaohui,Gao Fang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2006.02.005

2006-01-01

Abstract:In recent years,quantitative studies for the harmonization effect of China accounting standards (CAS) with International Accounting Standard(IAS)have increased rapidly.However,there exist many differences and even conflicts of the conclusions in the key points,sample and variable selection and period,and methods adapted.Those thus make the academic contributions and practical value of the studies debatable.This paper reviews the literature on quantitative research related to the harmonization effect of CAS with IAS from the following four aspects:the harmonization degree of the items in specific standards,the comparison of accounting numbers,the differences of the accounting information content,and the differences in the quality of reported earnings based on both CAS and IAS.The review explores the development and limitations of these studies in order to benefit the international development of CAS.This paper also puts forward suggestions for future research.

The International Comparison and Avalue of Owner's Rights and Interests

Common Institutional Blockholders and Reporting Practices: Evidence from Accounting Comparability

Analysis on Internationalization Progress for Chinese Enterprise Accounting Standard

Comparison on Interim Financial Report Standards of China and Vietnam

The Limitations and Improvements of the Accounting Research on Intangible Assets

A Study on Chinese Accounting Research Effects:Based on the Sample of Accounting Research (1982～2002)

Economic Consequence of Internationalization of Accounting Standards:Evidence from China

Ownership Structure,Related Party Transactions and Finn Value——Empirical Study on Listed Firms of China

Accounting Restatements,Ownership Property and Debt Financing

An Empirical Study on the Effects of Ownership Reform in China

State Ownership,Preferential Tax,and Corporate Tax Burdens

The Different Changes of Value Relevance of Earnings Between SOEs and NSOEs after Adoption of IFRS: Evidence from China

The Comparison of Experiences to Settle Bad Asset

Accounting comparability and the value relevance of earnings and book value

Research of the Chinese Accounting Internationalization

Comparative Study on Quality Characteristics of International Accounting Standards and Chinese Accounting Standards

The Accounting Model Choice for Insurance Contracts and its International Convergence

Research on the Environmental Factors Causing Accounting Differences Between China and Foreign Countries

The international harmonization progress of China Accounting Standards: A review of quantitative research

International Convergence and Equivalence of Accounting Standards:China’s Role and Contribution

The harmonization effect of China accounting standards with international accounting standards:A review of quantitative research