Abstract:Pools of high titered alloantisera were raised by immunizing (B10.A/SgSn X A/WySn)F1 mice with C57BL/10Sn(B10) spleen cells. This serum (F1 anti-B10), when added to one-way mixed lymphocyte cultures (MLC), inhibited stimulation of B10.A splenic responders by both B10 and B10.D2/nSn irradiated, splenic stimulators. The B10 stimulation was suppressed approximately 85% whereas the mean suppression of B10.D2 stimulation was approximately 60%. In the ofrmer case, the serum contained antibodies reactive with multiple major histocompatibility complex determinants on the stimulator cells. In the latter case, the cytoxic reactivity of the serum was directed principally against an I region-associated determinant Ia.8) shared by B10 and B10.D2 and coded for by a gene(s) in the I-A subregion. The magnitude of the suppression of the response to B10.D2 cells (60%) was similar to the reduction in stimulation observed when the Ia.8 difference was eliminated genetically by using (B10 X B10.A)F1 responder cells against irradiated B10.D2 stimulators. Ihhibition of MLC by this antiserum was a function of reactivity with stimulator and not responder cells. Although some pools of F1 anti-B10 antiserum produced partial inhibition of the responder cell in a B10.D2 vs B10.Ax MLC combination, the results were inconsistent and not correlated with the anti-Ia.8 cytotoxicity titers. In addition, an F1 anti-B10 antiserum pool, which consistently failed to inhibit the responder cell, nevertheless inhibited both irradiated B10.D2 and (B10.A X B10.D2)F1 cells from stimulating B10.A responder cells. However, this same antiserum did not inhibit stimulation of B10.D2 responder cells by the (B10.A X B10.D2)F1 stimulators. Thus, the binding of antibodies to the non-stimulating antigens on the F1 stimulator cell did not interfere with the capacity of the appropriate stimulating antigens to cause stimulation. All of these results are consistent with the hypothesis that Ia allo-antigens are the major stimulating determinants of I region-associated MLC reactions.

Debate and Fact on Safety of Genetically Modified Foods

Assessment of the safety of genetically modified foods

The Transfer of Foreign Genes and Its Expression Products in Genetically Modified Crops

Untangling the Debate Over Genetically Modified Foods

Prospects for the Development of Genetically Modified Foods in China

Increase Public Understanding on Genetically Modified Organisms and Biosafety Issues Based on Scientific Knowledge and Facts

Genetically Modified Organisms in Food: Production, Safety, Regulation and Public Health

Consumers' Perceptions on GM Food Safety in Urban China

[Genetically modified food (food derived from biotechnology): current and future trends in public acceptance and safety assessment].

Tempest in a Tea Pot: How did the Public Conversation on Genetically Modified Crops Drift so far from the Facts?

Global Overview of Genetically Modified Foods and Its Benefits: A Review

Regulation of GMOs in China.

Inhibition of stimulation in murine mixed lymphocyte cultures with an alloantiserum directed against a shared Ia determinant.

Formal Aspects of Computing A Nitpick Analysis of Mobile IPv 6

The landscape of online news regarding genetically modified foods: A cross-sectional study

On the Trade Dispute Derived from the Hidden Trouble of the Security of GMOs and the Countermeasures of China

Lessons on Communication with the Public on GM Food Safety in China

Myths and Realities about Genetically Modified Food: A Risk-Benefit Analysis

Consumers, GMOs and Label:An Empirical Analysis

Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modificed Foods: A Comparison Between the Us and China

[Genetically modified organisms: a new threat to food safety]