Abstract:Most studies exploring the public acceptance of genetically modified food (GMF) are based on social trust and the establishment of a causal model. The underlying premise is that social trust indirectly affects public acceptance of GMF through perceived risks and perceived benefits. The object of social trust is trust in people, organizations, and institutions. Different from the social trust, epistemic trust refers to people’s trust in scientific knowledge behind the technology of concern. It has been shown that epistemic trust, like social trust, is also an important factor that affects the public perception of applicable risks and benefits. Therefore, it is necessary to incorporate epistemic trust into the causal model to derive a more complete explanation of public acceptance. However, such work has not been conducted to date. The causal model proposed in this paper integrated epistemic trust and social trust and divided social trust into trust in public organizations and trust in industrial organizations. A representative questionnaire survey (N = 1091) was conducted with Chinese adults. The model was analyzed by the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) method. Three major findings were obtained: First, epistemic trust is an important antecedent of perceived risks and perceived benefits and exerts a significant indirect effect on the acceptance of GMF. Secondly, trust in industrial organizations negatively impacts perceived risks, while trust in public organizations positively impacts perceived benefits. Thirdly, contrary to the common opinion, trust in industrial organizations did not exert a significant direct effect on perceived benefits, and trust in public organizations did not demonstrate a significant direct effect on perceived risks. Therefore, trust in industrial organizations and trust in public organizations utilize different influence paths on GMF acceptance. This study enriches the understanding of the influence path of trust with regard to the acceptance of emerging technologies and is of great significance to relevant risk-management practices.

Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modificed Foods: A Comparison Between the Us and China

Awareness, Acceptance of and Willingness to Buy Genetically Modified Foods in Urban China

Public perception of genetically-modified (GM) food: A Nationwide Chinese Consumer Study

Attitudes in China about Crops and Foods Developed by Biotechnology

The decision to buy genetically modified foods in China: what makes the difference?

Information Sources and Consumer Attitudes Toward Genetically Modified Food in China

Consumers' Trust in Government and Their Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified Food: Empirical Evidence from China

Scientists’ Attitudes Toward Agricultural GM Technology Development and GM Food in China

Consumers’ Preferences for the Attributes of Plant-Based Meat in China: a Best-Worst Scaling Approach

Consumers' Trust in Government and its Impact on Their Acceptance toward Genetically Modified Food

Consumer intention to purchase GM soybean oil in China: effects of information consistency and source credibility

Consumers' Perceptions on GM Food Safety in Urban China

Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops

A Consumer Segmentation Study with Regards to Genetically Modified Food in Urban China

Consumer Attitudes Toward Biotech Foods in China

The Effects of Epistemic Trust and Social Trust on Public Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food: An Empirical Study from China

Genetically Modified Rice: Do Chinese Consumers Support or Go Against It? Based on the Perspectives of Perceived Risk and Trust

Prospects for the Development of Genetically Modified Foods in China

Understanding the Factors Driving Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Gene-Edited Foods in China

Angel or Devil:Social and cultural perspective to GM soybean in China

Social Acceptance for Commercialization of Genetically Modified Food Animals