AThree-dimensional Finite Element Analysis Characteristics for the Biomechanical of Orthodontic Anchorage Micro-implant
' YltngZhang,Dail Zhangi,Cuijuan Fengi,Tohru Takagi,Peng,Pengi,Hailong Hu,Noriyuki NagaiS,Toshiyuki,Kawakamii
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To establish a three-dimension finite lement model for orthodontic anchorage microimplant and analyze the infiuence ofdifferent titled angle en the biornechanical characteristics of onhodontic anchorage implant-bone interface. Methods: Use ANSYS (Analysis System) finite lemermt analysis software to perform the finite element modeling ofthe micro-implant with 7 ditferent tilted angle, including 300, 400, 500, 600, 7001 800and 90", Asimulated orthodontic foree, which was 200 grams, was loaded mesiodistally to the mathematical mode[s, the stress and displacement distribution on the implant-bone interface was analyzed. Results: As the titled angle increased , the Vbn-Mlses stress at the cervix ofthe imptants were 1.0792Mpa, 1,O104Mpa, O.8848Mpa, O.818IMpa, O.7583Mpa, O.6339Mpa and O.5608Mpa whi[e the dispLaeement were 5.5513pm, 4.9900um, 3.7419pm, 3.1264pm, 2.5874pm, 1.3624gem and O.8027pm, Conclusion: The microimplant can be safely loaded with 200 grams mesiodista1 orthodentic fo rce. Ihe increase f the titted angle can efficaciously enhance the implant's abitity ofbearing mesiodistal orthodontic force. Thus we should choose the vertical angle when the micre-imp[ant is embedded. Kye words: Micro-impLant, Finite element method, Stress anaLysis, Biomechanlcs Introduction Anchorage is one ofthe most important ftu]tors Ln a successfu1 orthodontic treatment. Compared with other methods used as anchorage, micro-implants have the advantages ofeasy insertion and removal minimal anatomic limitation instant loading goed patients compLianee and low expenses. To understand micreimplant better, it is lmperative to de biemechanlcs analysis, and Three-Dimensional Flnite Element Method (3D FEM) is by far the most reliable method. In this study, 3D FEM was used to analyze the influence of different titled angles on the biemechanical characteristics of impLant-bone interfacei'i). Materials and Methods There are four primary considerations in the development of thethree-dimensionagfiniteelementmodel:micro-implantdesign, geometry ofthe micro-implant and bone structures, estabtishment of three-dimensional finite lement rnodel of the micro-implant and material properties. Correspondence to Yalig Zhang, Department of Cinhodontics, School of Stomatology,ChinaMedicalUniversityl17NarijingNonhstreet,Heping District, Shenyang 11OO02, P.R. China, Ile1/+86-24-22891418, E-mail: mhangyahgcmu@yahoo.com,cn 69 Mcre-implantdesign The geemetry merphology ofour micro-implant used in this study had been experimentally determined. We designed the micreimplant as a knife-shaped sharp threaded colurrmar pure titanium screw (externaL diameter=2mm, interior diametert:1.6mm, length=9mm, threaded deepness flight depth=O.2mm, threaded angLe =600, threaded distance thread interyal=O.3mm). There would be 3mm teft when the micro-implant was embedded in the bone. The cortical bone around the micro-implant was postulated as lmm in thickness and considered as continueus sequentiat, well-distributed, homogeneous isotropic and linear and elastic body. Mbdel Geontetr), ANSYS (Analysis System) 6.1 finite element software was used to establish the finite element medel ofthe miero-impiant. The geometry ofour three-dimensional finite element rnodel efa micro-implant, was developed manually according to what had designedbefore.Establishnentofthree-dimensionalfiniteelement model of the micro-implant. The 9387 nodes and 5038 elements got from this mode] were manually input into the finite lement software that was used for The Society of Hard Tissue Biology NII-Electronic Library Service heSociety fHard is ue iology Yang Zhang et al.: this study. After the model was completed, boundary eonditions were defined at all periphera] nodes of the bone with O ef movement in all directions. Each element was then assigned a specitic material property. BiomechanicalCharacteristicseforthodonticanchoragemicro-implant Material properties Ihe material referred in this study was postulated as sequentiaL, isotropic and linear elastic. The Ybung's modulus and the Polsson 's ratio ofthe material derived from related research. Biomechanicsanalysis ANSYS finite lement analysis software was used to perform the finite eiement modeLing of the micro-implant with 7 different angle, including 30e, 40e, 50e, 600, 700, 80"and 90erespectively. A simulated orthodontic force 200 grams was loaded horizontal to the mathematic model, the stress and displacement disnibution on the implant-bone interface were analyzed. Results Thedistributionsofstressanddisplaeementwereobtainedfrom the micro-implant 3D FEM model. The stress distributions on the implant-bone interface with different tilted angles were displayed in figure 1-7, while the corresponding displaeement distributions were displayed in figure8-14. The Nbn-Mises stress on the implant-bone interface mainly focused on the cervix and decreased rapidLy in the cortical bone, while that in the spongy bone was very smali, The Ven-Mlses stress on the cervix ofthe implant were 1 .0792Mpa, 1.0104MPa, O.8848MPa, O.8181MP4 0,7583Mpa, O.6339Mpa and O.5608MPa respectively according to different ilted angles. The maximum Vbn-Mises stress decreased significantly with the increasing ef titled angle. The displacements of the implant-bone interface were very small under whatever conditions when the micre-implant was loaded with 200 gram horizontat orthedontie force. The maximum displacement was only 6.S253um at the loadlng point. The displacements ofmicre-implant were also regularly distributed with relative larger displacement on cervix ancl apex. The displacement on the implant cervix is largerthan that on the apix and in opposite directions. The maximum displacements on the implant-bone interface w re 5.5513pm, 4.9900pm, 3,7419pm, 3.1264pm,2.5874pm,1.3624pmandO.8027pmrespectivelywith the increasing of tilted angle. The maximum displacement on the Fig.1.Thestressdisnibutionon the implant-bone interface when the titl ed angle is 300, Fig. 3, The stress disuibution on theimplant-boneinterfacewhen the titled angle is 500. L'ig.5. The stress distribution on the irnplant-bone interface when the titted angleis 700. Fig. 2. The stress distribution on theimplant-boneinterfacewhen the titled angle is 40e. Fig. 4. The stress distribution o theimplant-boneinterfacewhen thc titled angle is 60a. Fig. 6. Ihe stress di st[ibution on theimplant-boneinterilacewhen the titled angle is 800 Fig. 7. The stress di stribution on theimp]ant-boneinterfacewhen thc titled angle is 900 Fig.9.lhedispSacementdistribution ontheimplant-boneinterfacewhen the titled angle is 40" Figll.Thedisp]acamentdismibuticm on the imptant-bone interface wh n the titled angle is 600 Fig.8.Thedisplacementdisnibution ontheimplant-borieinterfacewhen the tit]ed angle is 300 Fig,10,lhedisplaccmentdistribution on the irnptant-bone interface when the tit]ed ang]e is SOO Fig, 12. The displacement distribution on the implant-bone interface when the titled angle is 700 70 The Society of Hard Tissue Biology NII-Electronic Library Service heSociety fHard is ue iology J. Hant Zssue Bioiogy. i5(2].' 6972,2006 Fig.13.Thedisplacementdistribution Fig.14.The displacemcnt on the implant-bone interface when distribution on the implant-bone thetit]edangteisSOO interface-・hcnthetjtledangleis90" Y i,g i・ t anySelO'mp4(Te"ptse'angleSor gtieVe re' dyev-agtegtys vaft'Ml$essttess tt'