Common carotid artery versus femoral artery small-caliber vessels transplantation model in pigs

Shu-yang LU,Peng ZHANG,Xiao-ning SUN,Shou-guo YANG,Fei-rong GONG,Chun-sheng WANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-8467.2014.04.006

2014-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the advantage of common carotid artery versus femoral artery small-caliber vessel transplantation model in pigs. Methods Ten healthy pigs were used in the present study.Common carotid artery small-caliber vessel transplantation model was established in 10 pigs,while femoral artery small-caliber vessel transplantation model was established in 6 pigs.Two vessel transplantation models were compared on aspects of vascular anatomy,surgical operation and post-operation observation. Results Common carotid artery was deeper which made anastomosis difficult,but the vessel was larger(diameter 4.8 mm±0.3 mm)and had less branches.Femoral artery was more superficial and easy to be found and dissected.It was easy to be exposed for vessel anastomosis in operation,however,the vessel was thinner(diameter 3.9 mm±0.2 mm)and had more perforating branches.In both of common carotid artery and femoral artery small-caliber vessel transplantation models,no abnormal clinical manifestation was observed when thrombosis happened(6in carotid artery transplantation models and 4 in femoral artery transplantation models).Clinical observation could not help detecting whether the artificial vessels thrombosed or not. Conclusions The establishment of common carotid artery and femoral artery small-caliber vessel transplantation model was possible,both of them could be used as a model for the research of small-caliber vessel.However,both of the two models had their own advantages and disadvantages.