The value of subjective global assessment in assessing the nutritional status and predicting the prognosis of the patients with digestive system malignant tumor

WU Bei-wen,CAO Wei-xin,YAN Min,ZHANG Jun
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To elucidate the value of subjective global assessment(SGA) in nutritional status evaluation and prognosis prediction in the patients with digestive system malignant tumor. Methods The preoperative nutritional status of the 626 patients with digestive system malignant tumor were appraised by SGA, anthropometric parameters and laboratory parameters, the complications of these patients after operation and the length of hospital stay (LOS) were recorded and followed up. Results ①The incidence of malnutrition among the 626 patients were 48.40%(303/626); ②The incidence of malnutrition was obviously related to the site of tumor. The highest incidence of malnutrition was found in pancreatic cancer(74.19%), the lowest in intestinal cancer(44.94%), and esophageal cancer(55.56%)and gastric cancer(46.12%)came between. There were 67.25% of patients experiencing weight loss and 31.47% of patients with intake decrease. ③Classified by SGA, the patients were devided into SGA-A, SGA-B and SGA-C groups with normal nutritional status, mild to moderate malnutrition and severe malnutrition. The difference of the serum protein level, body mass index(BMI) and triceps skinfold thickness(TSF) among the 3 groups was significant(P<0.05). But the results of SGA did not correlated satisfactorily with the other parameters(serum protein level, BMI and TSF; r=0.251~0.371). ④The incidence of complication was 23.96%(150/626) in this study, the highest being in the SGA-C group(35.0 %). ⑤ The average LOS of the 626 patients was (22.05±10.27)days. There existed a significant difference of LOS among the three SGA groups(P<0.05), and the longest LOS was in the SGA-C group. Conclusions Compared with the serum protein level and anthropometric parameters, SGA is a better tool to assess the nutritional status and predict the complications rate and LOS in patients with digestive system malignant tumor.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?