Association between risk of malnutrition defined by Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment and adverse outcomes in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Junfang Zhang,Wei Xu,Heng Zhang,Yu Fan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980024000788

2024-03-29

Public Health Nutrition

Abstract:Objective: To assess the association between the risk of malnutrition, as estimated by the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) numerical scores, and adverse outcomes in oncology patients. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Settings: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CKNI, VIP, Sinomed, and Wanfang database. Studies that examined the association between the risk of malnutrition, as estimated by the PG-SGA numerical scores, and overall survival or postoperative complications in oncology patients were included. Patients were classified as low risk (PG-SGA≤3), medium risk (PG-SGA 4-8), and high risk of malnutrition (PG-SGA>8). Subject: Nineteen studies reporting on 20 articles (n = 9,286 patients). Results: The prevalence of medium and high risk of malnutrition ranged from 16.0% to 71.6%. A meta-analysis showed that cancer patients with medium and high risk of malnutrition had a poorer overall survival (adjusted hazard ratios [HR] 1.98; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.77-2.21) compared to those with a low risk of malnutrition. Stratified analysis revealed that the pooled HR was 1.55 (95% CI 1.17-2.06) for medium risk of malnutrition and 2.65 (95% CI 1.90-3.70) for high risk of malnutrition. Additionally, the pooled adjusted odds ratio for postoperative complications was 4.65 (95% CI 1.61-13.44) for patients at medium and high risk of malnutrition. Conclusions: The presence of medium and high risk of malnutrition, as estimated by the PG-SGA numerical scores, is significantly linked to poorer overall survival and an increased risk of postoperative complications in oncology patients.

public, environmental & occupational health,nutrition & dietetics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to evaluate the association between the malnutrition risk estimated by the Patient - Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG - SGA) score and the adverse outcomes in cancer patients. Specifically, the study explored the effects of moderate and high malnutrition risks on the overall survival rate and postoperative complications of cancer patients through systematic review and meta - analysis methods.

The study design included a comprehensive search of multiple databases and selected studies that met specific criteria. These studies examined the relationship between the malnutrition risk estimated by the PG - SGA score and the overall survival or postoperative complications of cancer patients. According to the PG - SGA score, patients were divided into three groups: low - risk (PG - SGA ≤ 3), moderate - risk (PG - SGA 4 - 8), and high - risk (PG - SGA > 8).

The study results showed that cancer patients with moderate and high malnutrition risks had significantly poorer overall survival rates compared to low - risk patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.77 - 2.21). Stratified analysis showed that the pooled HR for moderate - risk patients was 1.55 (95% CI 1.17 - 2.06), and the pooled HR for high - risk patients was 2.65 (95% CI 1.90 - 3.70). In addition, the pooled adjusted odds ratio (OR) for postoperative complications in patients with moderate and high malnutrition risks was 4.65 (95% CI 1.61 - 13.44).

The conclusion is that the moderate and high malnutrition risks estimated by the PG - SGA numerical score are significantly associated with the poorer overall survival rate and increased risk of postoperative complications in cancer patients. This suggests that using PG - SGA to assess the nutritional status of cancer patients in clinical practice can provide important prognostic information.