Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the performance implications of two major mechanisms for organizational learning (i.e. exploration and exploitation). Exploration refers to firm activities that explore new and novel knowledge, whereas exploitation reflects the extent to which a firm reuses its existing knowledge. The authors predict curvilinear (i.e. an inverted U-shape) relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance, respectively. That is, firm performance first increases with exploration/exploitation at a decreasing rate; then, firm performance decreases at an increasing rate after firm performance reaches a maximum point. Furthermore, the authors examine whether the curvilinear relationships are moderated by two types of firm–stakeholder relationships (i.e. firm–employee and firm–customer relationships). Design/methodology/approach Using the data from National Bureau of Economic Research, US Patent Citations Data File, KLD Research and Analytics Inc. and Compustat series, the authors construct an unbalanced panel data set of 3,070 observations in 554 firms from 1991 to 2006. To test the hypotheses, feasible generalized least squares regression is used. Findings In consistent with the prediction, the authors find inverted U-shape relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance. The authors also find that the curvilinear relationships are moderated by firm–employee relationships. The relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance become stronger when firms have better relationships with employees. Research limitations/implications The study provides empirical evidence that better firm–employee relationships can strengthen the curvilinear relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance. The authors argue that future studies should extend to other stakeholder relationships, using more refined measures, and incorporating the concept of ambidexterity. Practical implications The findings suggest that managers should design innovation strategy based on performance implications of exploration/exploitation and that managers should also realize that stakeholder relationships can influence the relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance. First, the study shows that although exploration and exploitation can improve firm performance, too much exploration or exploitation is not good for firm performance. Therefore, managers should consider seriously the maximum point of performance that exploration and exploitation can reach and avoid too much exploration or exploitation. Second, firms can invest in firm–employee relationships to gain better performance implications from exploration/exploitation. The study shows that, as firms develop better firm–employee relationship, the relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance are stronger and firm performance is likely to reach a higher apex. Originality/value The authors find the inverted U-shape relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance, moreover, the authors add two contingent factors associated with stakeholders that can help exploration and exploitation contribute more to firm performance.

Relationship among Stakeholders, Green Management, and Performance

The Role of Stakeholder Participation and Sustainability Integration in Maritime Transport: A Structure-Conduct-performance Analysis

Contingent View on the Relationship Between Proactive Environmental Strategy and Corporate Performance: Toward Stakeholder Engagement

Promoting sustainable development: Multiple mediation effects of green value co‐creation and green dynamic capability between green market pressure and firm performance

Effects of Green Innovation on Environmental and Corporate Performance: A Stakeholder Perspective

Unabsorbed Slack, Green Management Practices, and Firm Performance

Green Innovation Strategy and Corporate Performance:An Empirical Research with Employee Participation as a Mediating Variable

Stakeholder Engagement and Competitive Advantage of the Firms——The Case of Corporate Environmental Management in China

The Driving Force of Improving Coroparate Environmental Performance Based on the Stakeholder Theory

Green supply chain management for operational performance: anteceding impact of corporate social responsibility and moderating effects of relational capital

Does green investment improve company performance

Advancing eco-excellence: Integrating stakeholders’ pressures, environmental awareness, and ethics for green innovation and performance

Green initiatives and stakeholder engagement: Unveiling the impact of green strategies and CSR on financial performance from descriptive‐normative perspectives of stakeholder theory

Environmental orientation and corporate performance: The mediation mechanism of green supply chain management and moderating effect of competitive intensity

The Influence of Green Transformation on ESG Management and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Comparison of Companies in the Pearl River Delta and Yangtze River Delta

Corporate Social Responsibility, Green Supply Chain Management and Firm Performance: the Moderating Role of Big-Data Analytics Capability

Quality and Green Management for Operational and Environmental Performance: Relational Capital in Supply Chain Management

The effects of green innovation and environmental management on the environmental performance and value of a firm: an empirical study of energy-intensive listed companies in China

Do stakeholder relationships matter? An empirical study of exploration, exploitation and firm performance

Improving Corporate Performance through Stakeholder-Based ESG Practices

Understanding Firm Performance on Green Sustainable Practices through Managers’ Ascribed Responsibility and Waste Management: Green Self-Efficacy as Moderator